品种与技术

稻曲病防治药剂筛选及防控技术研究

展开
  • 1 杭州市余杭区农业生态与植物保护管理总站,杭州 311100;2 杭州市萧山区农业局,杭州 311201;3 中国水稻研究所,杭州 311401

网络出版日期: 2015-11-20

基金资助

中国农业科学院科技创新工程;转基因重大专项(2011ZX08010G005,2011ZX08001G002);农业科技支撑计划资助项目(2012BAD19B03);中央级公益性科研院所专项资金资助项目(2011RG009,2012ZL096)

The Control Technologies and Fungicides Screening for Rice False Smut Ustilaginoideavirens

Expand

Online published: 2015-11-20

摘要

针对生产上危害日益严重的稻曲病,在大田开展了防治药剂筛选试验,探讨了不同施药时期和施药方法对稻曲病的防控效果。结果表明,用量为750 g/hm2时,药剂NXF2014-12对稻曲病的防效最好,穗防效和病指防效分别为78.32%和83.30%,极显著优于对照药剂23%醚菌酯·氟环唑SC(尊保);在大多数稻株处于“叶枕平”或“叶枕距0”生育期时施第1次药,破口期或始穗期(本试验为籼粳杂交稻组合甬优12,实际为第1次施药后10 d)施第2次药,对稻曲病不论是穂防效还是病情指数防效均极显著优于主穗“叶枕平”时施第1次药的防效;在大多数稻株“叶枕平”时采用细雾喷雾打第1次药,破口期打第2次药对稻曲病的穗防效和病情指数防效均无大的差异。生产上要根据防控对象及其发生的部位,选用专化性药剂,在用足药量的前提下,采用不同的施药方法才能达到理想的防控效果。

本文引用格式

汪爱娟1,王国荣2,孙磊3,李路3,刘连盟3,黄世文3* . 稻曲病防治药剂筛选及防控技术研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2015 , 21(6) : 45 -51 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2015.06.009

Abstract

Field trial for screening fungicides of controlling rice false smut (RFS)(Ustilaginoideavirens) which seriously occurred and damaged increasingly in rice production were carried out. The effects of different stage of pesticide application and different application methods on the control efficacy were investigated. The results indicated that the best control efficacy of fungicide NXF2014-12 to RFS when the use dosage of 750 g/hm2. The control efficacy of panicle infected rate and disease index rate were 78.32% and 83.30%, respectively. The control efficacy of NXF2014-12 to RFS was significantly higher than the control of fungicide 23% kresoxim-methyl·epoxiconazolesuspension concentrate (SC). Pesticide application for the first time was implemented at the growing stage of “level phyllula”or “zero distance of phyllula”of most rice plants, and second spray of fungicide was carried out at breach stage or begin heading stage (in this experiment, the rice variety was indica / japonica hybrid combination Yongyou 12, the second spraying was actually at 10 d after first application) of the first time pesticide application. The control efficacy of first time pesticide application at “level phyllula”of most rice plants was better than that of the caulis. Fine spray and thick spray were carried out for the first time at “level phyllula” of most rice plants, and second spray was implemented 10 days after first application,the control efficacy both of panicle infected rate and disease index rate show no significantly difference. In order to achieve the ideal control efficacy in rice production, it is necessary to select the special chemicals and spray enough dosage of suspension according to the control targets and their occurred site on the rice plants’ parts and adopt different application methods.

参考文献

[1] Zhang Y, Zhang K, Fang A F, et al. Specific adaptation of Ustilaginoideavirens in occupying host florets revealed by comparative and functional genomics[J]. Article Nature Communications, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4849.
[2] Padwick G W. Manual of rice diseases[M]. Kew, UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute, 1950.
[3] Zhou Y L, Pan Y J, Xie X W, et al. Genetic diversity of rice false smut fungus, Ustilaginoideavirens and its pronounced differentiation of populations in north China[J]. J Phytopathol, 2008, 156(9): 559-564.
[4] Ahonsi M O, Adeoti A A. False Smut on upland rice in eight rice producing locations of Edo state, Nigeria[J]. J Sustain Agr, 2002, 20(3): 81-94.
[5] Atia M M M. Rice false smut (Ustilaginoideavirens) in Egypt[J]. J Plant Dis Protect, 2004, 111(1): 71-82.
[6] Bischoff J F, Sullivan R F, Kjer K M, et al. Phylogenetic placement of the anamorphic tribe Ustilaginoideae(Hypocreales, Ascomycota)[J]. Mycologia, 2004, 96(5): 1 088-1 094.
[7] Brooks S A, Anders M M, Yeater K M. Effect of cultural management practices on the severity of false smut and kernel smut of rice[J]. Plant Disease, 2009, 93(11): 1 202-1 208.(17=7).
[8] Ladhalakshmi D, Laha G S, Singh Ram, et al. Isolation and characterization of Ustilaginoideavirens and survey of false smut disease of rice in India[J]. Phytoparasitica, 2012, 40(2): 171-176.
[9] Rush M C, Shahjahan A K M, Jones J P, et al. Outbreak of false smut of rice in Louisiana[J]. Plant Disease, 2000, 84(1): 100.
[10] Tsuda M, Sasahara M, Ohara T, et al. Optimal application timing of simeconazole granules for control of rice kernel smut and false smut[J]. JGPP, 2006, 72(5): 301-304.
[11] Osada S. Effect of false smut occurrence on yield and quality of rice[J]. Ann Rep Society Plant Prot North Jpn, 1995, 46: 30-32.
[12] Parsons C E, Cartwright R D, Lee F N. Management of false smut disease of rice in Arkansas[J]. Phytopathology, 2001, 91: 70.
[13] Singh A K, Pophaly D J. An unusual rice false smut epidemic reported in Raigarh District, Chhattisgarh, India[J]. International Rice Research Notes, 2010, 35: 1-3.
[14] Yaegashi H, Fujita Sonoda R. Severe outbreak of false smut of rice in 1988[J]. Plant Protection Tokyo, 1989, 43(6): 311-314.
[15] 王大为,蔡继新. 稻曲病发病程度与水稻株型的相关性[J]. 垦殖与稻作,2004(3):24-25.
[16] Brooks S A, Anders M M, Yeater K M. Effect of furrow irrigation on the severity of false smut in susceptible rice varieties[J]. Plant Disease, 2010, 94: 570-574.
[17] Ashizawa T, Takahashi M, Moriwaki J, et al. Quantification of the rice false smut pathogen Ustilaginoideavirens from soil in Japan using real-time PCR[J]. Eur J Plant Pathol, 2010, 128(2): 221-232.
[18] Ashizawa T, Takahashi M, Moriwaki J, et al. A refined inoculation method to evaluate false smut resistance in rice[J]. J General Plant Pathol, 2011, 77: 10-16.
[19] Dodan D S, Singh S R. False smut of rice: present status[J]. Agricultural Review, 1996, 17: 227-240.
[20] Mandhare V K, Gawade S B, Game B C, et al. Prevalence and incidence of bunt tural and false smut in paddy (Oryza sativa L.) seeds in Maharastra[J]. AgriculScience Digest, 2008, 28: 292-294.
[21] Wang S, Li M, Dong H, et al. Sporulation, inoculation methods and pathogenicity of Ustilaginoideaalbicans, the cause of white rice false smut in China[J]. J Phytopathol, 2008, 156: 755-757.
[22] Zhou Y L, Izumitsu K, Sonoda R, et al. PCR-based specific detection of Ustilaginoideavirens and Ephelis japonica[J]. J Phytopathol, 2003, 151: 513-518.
[23] 陈志谊,聂亚锋,刘永锋. 江苏省水稻品种对稻曲病的抗病性鉴定及病菌致病力分化[J]. 江苏农业学报,2009,25(4):737-741.
[24] 李余生,朱镇,张亚东,等. 水稻稻曲病抗性的主基因+多基因混合遗传模型分析[J]. 作物学报,2008,34(10):1 728-1 733.
[25] 何海永,陈小均,詹金碧,等. 稻曲病发生与氮肥施用的关系初探[J]. 安徽农业科学,2008,36(20):8 665-8 666.
[26] 侯小华,李友荣,魏子生,等. 湖南稻曲病的发生与危害调查分析[J]. 湖南农业科学,2009(9):87-88.
[27] 刘希彦,王守功,金凤山,等. 稻曲病发生规律及防治研究[J]. 植物病理学报,1993,23(3):258-259.
[28] 潘勋,张淑平. 氮磷肥对稻曲病发生程度的影响[J]. 河北农业科学,1993 (1):18-20.
[29] Tang Y X, Jin J, Hu D W, et al. Elucidation of the infection process of Ustilaginoideavirens(teleomorph: Villosiclavavirens) in rice spikelets[J]. Plant Pathol, 2012, 62(1): 1-8.
[30] 唐启义. DPS数据处理系统—实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘:2版[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2010.
[31] 黄世文,刘连盟,王玲,等. 药液量及施药方法对不同株型水稻后期主要病虫害防效的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学,2012,26 (2):211-217.
[32] 傅秀林. 从品种选育利用的角度探讨解决吉林省稻曲病的危害问题[J]. 吉林农业科学,1994 (4):27-29.
[33] 黄世文,余柳青. 水稻品种(组合)与稻曲病的发生及防治[J]. 中国稻米,2003(4):32-33.
[34] Koiso Y, Li Y, Iwasaki S, et al. Ustiloxins, antimitotic cyclic peptides from false smut balls on rice panicles caused by Ustilaginoideavirens[J]. J Antibiot (Tokyo), 1994, 47: 765-773.
[35] Koiso Y, Morisaki N, YamashitaY, et al. Isolation and structure of an antimitotic cyclic peptide, ustiloxin F: chemical interrelation with a homologous peptide, ustiloxin B[J]. J Antibiot (Tokyo), 1998, 51: 418-422.
[36] Luduena R F, Roach M C, Prasad V, et al. Interaction of ustiloxin A with bovine brain tubulin[J]. Biochem Pharmacol, 1994, 47: 1 593 -1 599.
[37] Nakamura K, Izumiyama N, Ohtsubo K, et al. “Lupinosis”-like lesions in mice caused by ustiloxin, produced by Ustilaginoideavirens: amorphologicalstudy[J]. Natural Toxins, 1994, 2: 22-28.
[38] Li Y, Koiso Y, Kobayashi H, et al. Ustiloxins, new antimitotic cyclic peptides: interaction with porcine brain tubulin[J]. Biochem Pharmacol, 1995, 49: 1367-72.
[39] 董涛海,钱钧,徐国军,等.稻曲病对粳稻产量损失的测定[J]. 浙江农业科学,2003 (2):85-86.
[40] 王金辉,陈越华. 湖南省2004年中、晚稻稻曲病流行情况调查[J]. 中国植保导刊,2005,25(8):14-15.
[41] 张贤党,叶传广,易孔文,等.中稻稻曲病大流行的原因及防治对策[J]. 现代农业科技,2009(5): 123.
[42] Honkura R, Osada S. The time of chemicals application for control of kernel smut of rice plant (in Japanese)[J]. Ann Rep Plant Prot North Jpn, 1993, 44: 10.
[43] Whitney N G. Effect of fungicide applications on kernel smut of rice[J]. Plant Disease Reporter, 1977, 61: 379-381.
[44] Chen Y, Zhang Y, Yao J, et al. Frequency distribution of sensitivity of Ustilaginoideavirens to four EBI fungicides, prochloraz, difenoconazole, propiconazole and tebuconazole, and their efficacy in controlling rice false smut in Anhui Province of China[J]. Phytoparasitica, 2013, 41: 277-284.
[45] 阮宏椿,杨秀娟,石妞妞,等. 不同杀菌剂对水稻稻曲病菌的室内毒力及田间药效[J]. 福建农业学报,2013,28(6):580-583.
[46] 胡光瑞,潘财升,潘红光,等. 浙南山区稻曲病重发原因及药剂防控关键技术研究[J]. 安徽农学通报,2010,16(5):98-100.
[47] 张震,柴荣耀,陈桂华,等. 几种药剂防治水稻稻曲病效果试验[J]. 浙江农业科学,2010(6):1 328-1 329.
[48] 王新超. 12.5%氟环唑悬浮剂防治水稻稻曲病效果研究[J].现代农业科技,2013(5):144.
[49] 何海永,谭清群,陈小均,等. 不同杀菌剂对水稻稻曲病的防治效果评价[J]. 安徽农学通报,2013,19(17):76-77.
[50] 张友明,史晓利,蔡建华,等. 27.12%碱式硫酸铜悬浮剂不同用药时期对稻曲病的防效研究[J].现代农业科技,2012(11):116.
[51] 周奋启,耿跃,徐蕾,等. 不同用药时期6种常用药剂对水稻稻曲病的防治效果研究[J]. 现代农药,2013,12(5):54-56.
[52] 魏广太,周保东,周燕,等. 25%苯醚甲环唑EC对水稻纹枯病和稻曲病的防治试验[J]. 现代农药,2009,8(2):51-53.
[53] 李仲惺,周学杰. 肟菌·戊唑醇在水稻全程防病中的应用[J]. 中国植保导刊,2012,32(6):51-53.
[54] 李军,诸茂龙. 75%拿敌稳水分散粒剂对水稻穗期稻瘟病及稻曲病防效研究[J]. 现代农业科技,2013(2):138.
[55] 罗华池,王会福,符海. 75%肟菌·戊唑醇(拿敌稳)WG防治稻曲病效果及应用技术[J]. 生物灾害科学,2013,36(3):295-297.
[56] 刘郁,桑海旭,王井士,等. 75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG防治滨海稻区主要病害最佳施用时期的研究[J]. 世界农药,2013,35(3):59-61.
[57] 郭才国. 不同施药时期和次数对稻曲病防治效果的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报,2013,19 (1):80-81.
[58] 董涛海,李东,徐国军,等. 稻曲病侵染时期及防治技术探讨[J].浙江农业科学,2004 (3):153-154.
[59] 许美良,陈永兵,周有铭,等.水稻稻曲病防治适期及策略初探[J].浙江农业学报,2005,17(3):161-162.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发