采用大田试验，以旱优8号为试验材料，比较评价了节水灌溉条件下不同氮肥类型和施用方式对节水抗旱稻产量、经济效益、氮素吸收和田面水不同形态氮素动态变化的影响。结果表明，相同氮肥用量条件下，不同氮肥类型和施用方式的氮素吸收与产量高低无明显相关关系。在等氮量投入下，缓释肥配施无机化肥处理（SCU1）总吸氮量最高，氮收获指数（NHI）最低，造成了水稻对氮素的奢侈吸收，不利于高产群体的构建，产量相对较低；缓释肥一次性基施处理（SCU2）的NHI最高，且灌浆结实期作物生长率和比叶重较高，利于光合产物的积累，产量最高，显著高于纯化肥处理（增产18.28%）；有机肥无机肥配施处理（OCN）的作物群体质量、产量和氮素吸收利用与单施无机化肥处理相比无明显差异。SCU1处理降低了基肥和分蘖肥期田面水总氮和铵态氮浓度，但增加了穗肥期的田面水氮浓度，而SCU2处理和OCN处理在3个施肥期内田面水总氮和氨态氮浓度均明显低于纯化肥处理，SCU2处理氮素浓度最低。综合成本效益分析，缓释肥一次性基施技术能够满足节水抗旱稻生长对氮素的需求，提高作物产量、经济效益和氮素利用效率，降低径流损失风险，是值得在太湖流域推广的一种施肥技术。
侯朋福1,薛利祥1,范立慧1，2,赵江宁1,薛利红1*,杨林章1,俞映倞1,冯彦房1,何世颖1
. 氮肥类型及施用方式对节水抗旱稻田面水氮动态及产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2016
, 22(3)
: 43
-48
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2016.03.011
Field experiment was carried out to study the influence of different nitrogen（N） fertilizer type and application method on rice yield, N uptake, profit and the surface water N dynamics with Hanyou 8 （water-saving and drought-resistance rice） as material. The results showed that there was no significant correlation between N uptake and yield under different N type and application method with the same N application rate （200 kg/hm2）. Compared with pure chemical N treatment （CN）, SCU1 treatment （70% of N was sulfur coated urea applied at basal, and 30% as common urea applied as panicle fertilizer） had the highest plant N uptake but the lowest N harvest index （NHI）, which caused a relative low yield due to the N luxuary uptake. SCU2 treatment （all N was sulfur coated urea applied at basal） had the highest NHI, maximum specific leaf weight and crop growth rate at grain filling stage, therefore the yield was highest and significantly higher than pure chemical N treatment（CN）. Additionally，no significant difference in crop population indices，yield and nitrogen uptake was found between OCN（20% N as organic fertilizer applied at basal） and CN treatments. Compared with CN treatment, SCU1 decreased the surface water N concentration at basal and tillering fertilizer stage, but increased that at panicle fertilizer stage. While SCU2 and OCN decreased the surface water N concentration at all three fertilizer stages with the lowest value for SCU2. Based on cost-benefit analysis, SCU2 could increase N use efficiency, yield and economic income, reduce the N runoff loss risk. Thus, it could be an economic, high-yielding and environment-friendly measure for water-saving and drought-resistance rice in Taihu Lake region.
[1] Carpenter S R, Caraco N F, Correll D L, et al. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen[J]. Ecol Appl, 1998, 8（3）: 559-568.
[2] Xu J, Peng S, Yang S, et al. Ammonia volatilization losses from a rice paddy with different irrigation and nitrogen managements[J]. Agr Water Manage, 2012, 104: 184-192.
[3] 俞映倞，薛利红，杨林章. 太湖地区稻田不同氮肥管理模式下氨挥发特征研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报，2013，32（8）：1 682-1 689.
[4] Sun H, Zhang H, Wu J, et al. Laboratory lysimeter analysis of NH3 and N2O emissions and leaching losses of nitrogen in a rice-wheat rotation system irrigated with nitrogen-rich wastewater[J]. Soil Sci, 2013, 178（6）: 316-323.
[5] 赵冬，颜廷梅，乔俊，等. 稻季田面水不同形态氮素变化及氮肥减量研究[J]. 生态环境学报，2011，20（4）：743-749.
[6] 张丽娟，马中文，马友华，等. 优化施肥和缓释肥对水稻田面水氮磷动态变化的影响[J]. 水土保持学报，2012，26（1）：90-94.
[7] 薛利红，俞映倞，杨林章. 太湖流域稻田不同氮肥管理模式下的氮素平衡特征及环境效应评价[J]. 环境科学，2011，32（4）： 1 133-1 138.
[8] Shang Q, Gao C, Yang X, et al. Ammonia volatilization in Chinese double rice-cropping systems: a 3-year field measurement in long-term fertilizer experiments[J]. Biol Fert Soils, 2014, 50（5）: 715-725.
[9] Huang P, Zhang J, Zhu A, et al. Coupled water and nitrogen （N） management as a key strategy for the mitigation of gaseous N losses in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain[J]. Biol Fert Soils, 2014: 1-10.
[10] 薛利红，杨林章，施卫明，等. 农村面源污染治理的“4R”理论与工程实践——源头减量技术[J]. 农业环境科学学报，2013，32（5）：881-888.
[11] 罗利军，梅捍卫，余新桥，等. 节水抗旱稻及其发展策略 [J]. 科学通报，2011，56（11）：804-811.
[12] Shrestha S, Asch F, Dusserre J, et al. Climate effects on yield components as affected by genotypic responses to variable environmental conditions in upland rice systems at different altitudes[J]. Field Crop Res, 2012, 134: 216-228.
[13] 李勇，周毅，尹晓明，等. 不同形态氮素对水稻和旱稻响应水分胁迫的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报：自然科学版，2006，34（5）：97-102.
[14] Steele K A, Price A H, Witcombe J R, et al. QTLs associated with root traits increase yield in upland rice when transferred through marker-assisted selection[J]. Theor Appl Genet, 2013, 126（1）: 101-108.
[15] Trijatmiko K R, Prasetiyono J, Thomson M J, et al. Meta-analysis of quantitative trait loci for grain yield and component traits under reproductive-stage drought stress in an upland rice population[J]. Mol Breeding, 2014, 34（2）: 283-295.
[16] Asai H, Samson B K, Stephan H M, et al. Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos: 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield [J]. Field Crop Res, 2009, 111（1）: 81-84.
[17] 邹桂花，梅捍卫，余新桥，等. 不同灌水量对水、旱稻营养生长和光合特性及其产量的影响[J]. 作物学报，2006，32（8）：1 179 - 1 183.
[18] 侯朋福，李刚华，张国发，等. 养分管理方式对江苏常规粳稻产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 土壤，2012，44（2）：218-224.
[19] 凌启鸿. 水稻精确定量栽培理论与技术[M]. 北京：中国农业出版社，2007.
[20] 李刚华，薛利红，尤娟，等. 水稻氮素和叶绿素 SPAD 叶位分布特点及氮素诊断的叶位选择[J]. 中国农业科学，2007，40（6）： 1 127-1 134.
[21] Sui B, Feng X, Tian G, et al. Optimizing nitrogen supply increases rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency by regulating yield formation factors[J]. Field Crop Res, 2013, 150: 99-107.
[22] Mae T. Physiological nitrogen efficiency in rice: nitrogen utilization, photosynthesis, and yield potential[M]//Plant nutrition for sustainable food production and environment. Springer Netherlands, 1997: 51-60.
[23] 顾佳，李勇，杨林章，等. 直播水稻田田面水氮素动态变化及径流损失研究[J]. 安徽农业科学，2009，37（8）：3 626-3 628.
[24] 马立珊，汪祖强，张水铭，等. 苏南太湖水系农业面源污染及其控制对策研究[J]. 环境科学学报，1997，17（1）：39-47.
[25] 宋勇生，范晓晖，林德喜，等. 太湖地区稻田氨挥发及影响因素的研究[J]. 土壤学报，2004，41（2）：265-269.
