专论与研究

连续翻耕秸秆粉碎还田土壤物理性状及水稻产量

展开
  • 1 江苏省农业科学院循环农业研究中心,南京 210014;2 江苏省现代作物生产协同创新中心,南京 210095

网络出版日期: 2017-07-20

基金资助

农业部公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201503118-07)

Effects of Consecutive Moldboard Plowing with Straw Chopping and Returning to Field on Soil Physical Properties and Yield of Rice

Expand

Online published: 2017-07-20

摘要

通过连续5年田间定位试验,研究了翻耕秸秆粉碎还田对稻麦两熟农田土壤物理性状、水稻产量及其构成因素的影响。结果表明,水稻收获时,翻耕秸秆粉碎还田处理能够有效降低耕层土壤容重、紧实度和土壤中固相部分所占比例,增加耕层土壤毛管孔隙度和土壤中气相部分所占比例。就水稻产量而言,翻耕秸秆粉碎还田处理较秸秆不还田处理有不同程度的提高,5年平均增产428 kg/hm2,增幅为4.50%,主要是通过增加有效穗数和穗粒数来提高水稻产量。总之,本试验条件下,翻耕秸秆粉碎还田措施有利于改善耕层土壤物理结构,提高水稻产量。

本文引用格式

孙国峰1,陈留根1,2*,刘红江1,张岳芳1,盛婧1,郑建初1 . 连续翻耕秸秆粉碎还田土壤物理性状及水稻产量[J]. 中国稻米, 2017 , 23(4) : 99 -101 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2017.04.019

Abstract

Field experiments for five consecutive years were conducted to investigate the effects of moldboard plowing with straw chopping and returning to field on soil physical properties, grain yield and its component factors in the rice-wheat rotation system. The results showed that moldboard plowing with straw returning (MPS) could reduce the soil bulk density, compactness and the proportion of solid phase, and which could increase soil capillary porosity and the proportion of liquid phase in the arable soil layer compared with moldboard plowing without straw(MP) at rice harvest. Moreover,the average rice yield of five years test of MPS treatment was increased by 428 kg/hm2 compared with MP treatment. The increase of yield was due to the increase of effective spike number per plant and grain number per spike. In all, under this experimental condition, the moldboard plowing with straw returning improved soil physical structure of arable layer, and increased rice yield.

参考文献

[1] 毕于运,高春雨,王亚静,等. 中国秸秆资源数量估算[J]. 农业工程学报,2009,25(12):211-217. [2] 李成芳,寇志奎,张枝盛,等. 秸秆还田对免耕稻田温室气体排放及土壤有机碳固定的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2011,30(11):2 362-2 367. [3] 刘世平,陈后庆,聂新涛,等. 稻麦两熟制不同耕作方式与秸秆还田土壤肥力的综合评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008,24(5):51-56. [4] 何七勇,吕卫光,郑宪清,等. 不同机械耕作方式对稻田秸秆还田土壤理化性状及产量的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 201531(5):66-69. [5] 孙国峰,郑建初,陈留根,等. 猪粪沼液使用后土壤理化性状及水稻产量初步研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2013,19(4):74-76,79. [6] 胡乃娟,韩新忠,杨敏芳,等. 秸秆还田对稻麦轮作农田活性有机碳组分含量、酶活性及产量的短期效应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(2):371-377. [7] 杨敏芳,朱利群,韩新忠,等. 不同土壤耕作措施与秸秆还田对稻麦两熟制农田土壤活性有机碳组分的短期影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2013,24(5):1 387-1 393. [8] 张翰林,郑宪清,何七勇,等. 不同秸秆还田年限对稻麦轮作土壤团聚体和有机碳的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016,30(4):216-220. [9] 张岳芳,郑建初,陈留根,等. 麦秸还田与土壤耕作对稻季CH4和N2O 排放的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2009,18(6):2 334-2 338. [10] 王海候,沈明星,陆长婴,等. 不同秸秆还田模式对稻麦两熟农田稻季甲烷和氧化亚氮排放的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2014,30(4):758-763. [11] Zhang Y F, Sheng J, Wang Z C, et al. Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from a Chinese wheat–rice cropping system under different tillage practices during the wheat-growing season[J]. Soil Tillage Res, 2015, 146: 261-269.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发