稻瘟病是最主要的世界性水稻病害,化学防治是目前最为有效的防控措施。通过室内生测和田间试验相结合的方法,测试了多个特效药剂和广谱药剂对稻瘟病的防治效果,探讨了稻瘟病的最优防治适期和穗颈瘟、稻曲病兼防的可能性。结果表明,三环唑仍然是预防穗颈瘟的特效杀菌剂,而嘧菌酯、肟菌酯·戊唑醇和嘧菌酯·苯醚甲环唑等广谱杀菌剂对叶瘟表现出更好的防控效果。始穗期是防治穗颈瘟的关键时期,在发病严重的情况下在齐穗期再施1次药是必要的。如果选用合适的药剂,破口前施药对穗颈瘟也有一定的防控作用。由于防治稻曲病的最佳施药时期是破口前,因此,一次施药兼防穗颈瘟和稻曲病是可行的。
梁梦琦1,刘连盟1,2,孙磊1,3,徐以华1,3,高健1,黄世文1*
. 生产上主要杀菌剂对稻瘟病的防效及施药时期研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2017
, 23(6)
: 93
-96
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2017.06.022
Rice blast is the main rice disease, and chemical control is the most effective measures at present. This study tested the control effects of some rice blast control specific fungicides and broad-spectrum fungicides, discussed the optimal control period of rice blast, the possibility of combination control rice false smut and rice neck blast through the method of field control experiment combination with indor test. The results showed that tricyclazole was still the best fungicide to control rice neck blast. The broad-spectrum fungicides, such as azoxystrobin, trifloxystrobin·tebuconazole and azoxystrobin·difenoconazole, showed better performance in controlling leaf blast; initial heading stage was the best stage for controlling rice neck blast, it was necessary to give another chemical spray in full heading stage when neck blast very serious. 5~7 days before heading stage was the best stage to control false smut of rice, there was also some effects for controlling rice neck blast. Therefore, it is feasible to control rice neck blast and rice false smut at one time.
[1] 沈瑛,朱培良,袁筱萍. 中国稻瘟病菌的遗传多样性[J]. 云南农业大学学报,1993,8(3):309-313.
[2] 孙国昌,杜新法,陶荣祥,等. 水稻稻瘟病防治策略和21世纪研究展望[J]. 植物病理学报,1998,28(4):289-292.
[3] 王静,李彦泉. 水稻稻瘟病综合防治技术[J]. 吉林农业:学术版,2012(6):69-69.
[4] 康晓霞,耿跃,王少华,等. 不同杀菌剂防治水稻穗稻瘟病田间药效评价[J]. 安徽农业科学,2015,43(8):87-88.
[5] 慕立义. 植物化学保护研究方法[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,1994:80-81.
[6] 李波涛,吴隆起,倪笑霞,等. 水稻稻瘟病菌对烯肟菌胺的抗性风险评估及抗性机制初探[J]. 植物病理学报,2014,44(1):80-87.
[7] 唐启义. 实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2002:418-449.
[8] 杨荣明,周明国,叶钟音. 三环唑防治稻瘟病的作用机制[J]. 南京农业大学学报,1998,21(2):34-37.