品种与技术

不同制剂处理对水稻秧苗素质的影响

展开
  • 1 杭州市萧山区农业局,杭州 311201;2 中国水稻研究所,杭州 311401;3 杭州市余杭区农业教育培训中心,杭州 311121

网络出版日期: 2017-11-20

Effects of Different Treatments of Preparation on Seedling Quality of Rice

Expand

Online published: 2017-11-20

摘要

盆栽试验结果显示,用漯效王1 000、1 200、1 500、2 000倍液浸种甬优12(籼粳杂交稻)和中浙优1号(籼型杂交稻)种子,2个水稻品种的种子发芽率、根长、胚芽长均与清水对照无明显差异。在不施化肥的情况下用漯效王喷施叶面,2个品种的株高、根长、地上部鲜质量、地下部鲜质量、叶绿素相对含量与清水对照也无明显差异。在对处理组施尿素后用漯效王喷施叶面,而对清水、普绿通、可杀得叁仟处理组只施尿素的情况下,漯效王处理的水稻株高、地上部鲜质量、地下部鲜质量、叶绿素相对含量明显优于清水对照、普绿通、可杀得叁仟处理。叶面喷施后14 d,漯效王处理组各指标依旧优于对照组。综合试验结果表明,漯效王在与尿素配合施用的情况下能够达到促进肥效、抗虫、促进根部和植株生长、促进分蘖的作用,并且药效持久性好。

本文引用格式

王国荣1,梁梦琦2, 孙磊2,许张杰3,黄世文2* . 不同制剂处理对水稻秧苗素质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2017 , 23(6) : 111 -113 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2017.06.027

Abstract

The results of pot experiments showed that there were no significant difference of the seed germination rate, root length and plumule length of hybrid combination Yongyou 12 and Zhongzheyou 1 when the seeds were treated with Luoxiaowang dilution suspension. There were also no evident difference of the seedling height, root length, fresh weight of overground part and underground part when the seedlings were sprayed with Luoxiaowang but without combined using of nitrogen fertilizer. However, when Luoxiaowang was sprayed after application of urea fertilizer, the plant height, fresh weight of overground part and underground part, and chlorophyll content were significantly higher than the treatments with Pulvtong, Keshade-3000 and the blank control (fresh water) after 10 day application. In conclusion, the experimental results indicated that the conbination of Luoxiaowang and urea could improve the fertilizer efficiency, rice resistance to pests, promote the growth of roots and plants, improve tillers of rice, and has long durability of efficiency.

参考文献

[1] 喻元秀,任景明,刘磊,等. 我国化肥污染的演变趋势及防治对策[A]. 2009中国可持续发展论坛暨中国可持续发展研究会学术年会论文集(上册)[C].中国可持续发展研究会,2009. [2] 胡社祝. 浅谈农业化肥污染与环境保护[J]. 广东农业科学,2008(9):138-139. [3] 刘延刚,刘德友,马宗国,等. 漯效王生态液肥对水稻生长发育和产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯,2011(2):34-35. [4] 郭琦. 漯效王液肥[J]. 农业知识,2012(28):40. [5] Kropff M J, Cassman K G, Van Laar H H, et al. Nitrogen and yield potential of irrigated rice[J]. Plant Soil, 1993, 155(1): 391-394. [6] 刘立军, 王志琴, 桑大志,等. 氮肥运筹对水稻产量及稻米品质的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报:农业与生命科学版,2002, 23(3) : 46-50. [7] 李刚华,丁艳锋,薛利红,等. 利用叶绿素计(SPAD-502)诊断水稻氮素营养和推荐追肥的研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(3):412-416.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发