品种与技术

不同生物农药对杂交中稻齐穗期螟虫的防治效果及产量的影响

展开
  • 1 四川省农业科学院水稻高粱研究所/农业部西南水稻生物学与遗传育种重点实验室,四川 德阳 618000;2 四川省作物生理生态及栽培重点实验室,四川 温江 611130

网络出版日期: 2019-11-20

基金资助

国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0301705);国家水稻产业技术体系(CARS-01-25)

Control Effects of Different Bio-pesticides on the Chilo suppressalis at Full Heading Stage and Yield of Middle Hybrid Rice

Expand

Online published: 2019-11-20

摘要

2018年在四川省德阳市进行大田试验,比较了5种生物农药对杂交中稻齐穗期螟虫的防治效果和产量的影响。结果表明,绿僵菌对杂交中稻齐穗期螟虫的防治效果最好,其白穗率最低,较化学农药康宽降低了27.5%;白僵菌、苏云金杆菌、苦参碱、藜芦碱处理齐穗期的白穗率均高于康宽处理,但差异不显著。与康宽处理相比,绿僵菌处理的杂交中稻产量增加了3.0%,增产不显著;白僵菌、苏云金杆菌、藜芦碱处理的杂交中稻产量与康宽处理相当。综合产量和白穗率来考虑,用绿僵菌对杂交中稻齐穗期螟虫(二代螟虫)进行防治较为适宜。

本文引用格式

蒋鹏1, 徐富贤1,2*,刘茂1,熊洪1,张林1,朱永川1,周兴兵1,郭晓艺1 . 不同生物农药对杂交中稻齐穗期螟虫的防治效果及产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2019 , 25(6) : 95 -97 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2019.06.023

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the control effects of five bio-pesticides on Chilo suppressalis and grain yield of mid-season hybrid rice in Deyang city of Sichuan province in 2018. The results showed that, the control effects of Metarhizium anisopliae against Chilo suppressalis at full heading stage were the best among the five bio-pesticides. The white panicle rate of Metarhizium anisopliae treatment was the lowest, which was 27.2% lower than chemical pesticide treatment(Coragen). There was no significant difference in white panicle rate between the other four bio-pesticides and chemical pesticide. Compared with the chemical pesticide treatment, the yield of Metarhizium anisopliae treatment was increased by 3.0%. The yields of Beauveria bassiana treatment, Bacillus thuringiensis treatment and Veratridine treatment were similar to chemical pesticide treatment. Considering the yield and white panicle rate of middle hybrid rice, Metarhizium anisopliae had the best control effect on the second generation of rice borer at the full panicle stage of hybrid rice.

参考文献

[1]    周喜应. 浅谈我国的农药与粮食安全[J]. 农药科学与管理,2014,35(8):5-8.
[2]    GRUNG M, LIN Y, ZHANG H, et al. Pesticide levels and environmental risk in aquatic environments in China: A review[J]. Environment International, 2015, 81: 87-97.
[3]    MALAKOF D, STOKSTAD E. Infographic: Pesticide planet[J]. Science, 2013, 341: 730-731.
[4]    贾兴娜,钟春燕,聂金泉,等. 生物农药在水稻病虫害防治上的应用现状和研究进展[J]. 现代农业科技,2016(14): 129-131.
[5]    薛进,陈秋芳,胡立冬,等. 不同生物农药对水稻二化螟及稻纵卷叶螟的防治效果[J]. 现代农业科技,2017(22):89-90.
[6]    张舒,张求东,罗汉钢,等. 金龟子绿僵菌CQMa421对水稻重要病虫的防治效果[J]. 湖北农业科学,2018,57(17):53-55.
[7]     胡娟,花日茂,李世广,等. 5种生物农药对水稻褐飞虱的防治效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(5):239-241.
[8]    陈瑞,王彦欣,洪奎贤,等. 2种生物杀虫剂对稻纵卷叶螟的防效[J]. 浙江农业科学,2013(6):701-702.
[9]    谌江华,柴伟纲,孙梅梅. 5种生物农药对稻飞虱混合种群的田间防治效果[J]. 中国稻米,2013,19(1):74-75.

文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发