品种与技术

不同缓(控)释肥料及运筹对双季稻生产特性及经济效益的影响

展开
  • 1宁波市农业技术推广总站,浙江 宁波 315012
    2宁波市甬丰农资有限公司,浙江 宁波 315012
    3万里神农有限公司,杭州 310021

第一作者:jiangqiww512@aliyun.com

*通讯作者:supersjc2@aliyun.com

收稿日期: 2020-09-15

  网络出版日期: 2021-01-20

Effects of Slow(Controlled) Release Fertilizers on Production and Economic Efficiency of Double Cropping Rice

Expand
  • 1Ningbo City Agricultural Technology Extension Station, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315012, China
    2Ningbo Yongfeng Nongzhi Co. Ltd, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315012, China
    3Wanli Shennong Co. Ltd, Hangzhou 310021, China
*Corresponding author: supersjc2@aliyun.com

Received date: 2020-09-15

  Online published: 2021-01-20

摘要

为减少化肥用量,提高种粮经济效益,以双季稻为材料,评价了不同类型缓(控)释肥对水稻产量、氮肥利用率及经济效益的影响。结果表明,在早稻上,施控释肥的处理产量较常规施肥处理增加4.49%,施木质素肥及缓释配方肥的处理较常规施肥处理减产0.60%~6.05%;在连作晚稻上,各缓(控)释肥处理比常规施肥处理增产1.01%~3.59%。从全年氮肥农学利用率及化肥减量增效情况看,除施缓释配方肥处理外,施木质素肥和施控释肥处理的氮肥农学效率均高于常规施肥处理。施控释肥的处理在减氮9.82%情况下,还增产增收2.01%;施木质素肥的处理在减氮19.44%和21.44%情况下,效益仅下降0.67%和1.07%。综合产量、肥料利用效率及经济效益等表现,控释肥和木质素肥在减少氮肥用量的情况下仍能够实现稳产增产,在经济效益不下降的情况下取得较好的生态效益,具有较高的推广应用前景。

本文引用格式

蒋琪, 陈少杰, 王飞, 秦方锦, 俞国君, 汪东东 . 不同缓(控)释肥料及运筹对双季稻生产特性及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2021 , 27(1) : 85 -88 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.01.016

Abstract

In order to reduce the use of chemical fertilizers and improve the economic benefits of rice, the slow(controlled) release fertilizers were applied on rice production to evaluate the effects on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and economic efficiency of double cropping rice. The results showed that, in early season rice, compared with the conventional fertilization treatment(C1), the yield of controlled release fertilizer treatment(C5) increased by 4.49%, while the yield of lignin slow release fertilizer treatments (C3, C4) and slow release formulated fertilization treatment(C2) decreased by 0.60%~6.05%. In late season rice, compared with C1, the yields of C2, C3, C4 and C5 increased by 1.01%~3.59%. The nitrogen agronomic efficiency(NAE) of C3﹑C4 and C5 treatment were higher than that of C1 treatment. Compared with C1 treatment, the economic benefit of C5 treatment increased by 2.01% under the nitrogen fertilizer application reduced by 9.82%, while the economic benefits of C3 and C4 treatment were merely decreased by 0.67% and 1.07% under the nitrogen fertilizer application reduced by 19.44% and 21.44%, respectively. Comprehensive consideration of grain yield, fertilizer utilization efficiency and economic benefits, controlled release fertilizer and lignin fertilizer could still obtain higher grain yields and NAE while reducing the amount of nitrogen fertilizer, and achieve better ecological benefits without reducing economic benefits, which has good prospect of promotion and application.

参考文献

[1] 凌启鸿,张洪程,丁艳锋,等. 水稻精确定量栽培与技术[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2007:1-4.
[2] 黄铁平,吴远帆,何宝生,等. 湖南省农作物化肥使用量零增长行动策略——基于矿质营养与有机营养并重使用的分析[J]. 农业现代化研究,2016,37(5):885-891.
[3] 樊小林,刘芳,廖照源,等. 我国控释肥料研究的现状和展望[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2009,15(2):463-473.
[4] 傅丽青,薛占奎,房玉伟,等. 不同缓/控释肥对单、双季晚稻生产特性及经济效益的影响[J]. 福建农业学报,2017,32(6):577-582.
[5] 李鹏,张敬智,魏亚,等. 配方施肥及磷肥后移对单季稻磷素利用效率、产量和经济效益的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学,2016,30(1):85-92.
[6] 张鸿燕,陈燕,刘宇新,等. 缓控释氮肥种类和用量对南方粳稻产量和收益的影响[J]. 中国稻米,2016,22(5):35-37.
[7] 方文英,姚荣建,陈佳麒,等. 单季稻不同施肥方式的减肥及增产效应[J]. 中国稻米,2019,25(6):86-88.
[8] 陆惠斌. 宁波市水稻双季机插高产关键技术的探讨[J]. 浙江农业科学,2015,56(10):1 542-1 545.
[9] 俞卫星,胡新春,王新溪,等. 缓控释肥对籼粳杂交稻产量、品质和经济效益的影响[J].中国农学通报,2016,32(21):1-5.
[10] 侯红乾,黄永兰,冀建华,等. 缓/控释肥对双季稻产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学,2016,30(4):389-396.
[11] 侯红乾,冀建华,刘益仁,等. 缓/控释肥对双季稻产量、氮素吸收和平衡的影响[J]. 土壤,2018,50(1):43-50.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发