专论与研究

上海软米品种品质性状分析与评价

展开
  • 1上海市种子管理总站,上海 201103
    2光明米业(集团)有限公司农业技术中心,上海202171
    3上海市农业技术推广服务中心,上海 201103

#共同第一作者

*通讯作者:605591791@qq.com

收稿日期: 2020-11-17

  网络出版日期: 2021-03-20

基金资助

上海市水稻产业技术体系建设[沪农科产字(2019)第3号]

Analysis and Evaluation of Quality Characters of Soft Rice in Shanghai

Expand
  • 1Shanghai Seed Management Station, Shanghai 201103, China
    2Agricultural Technology Center of Bright Rice(Group)Limited Company, Shanghai 202171, China
    3Shanghai Agricultural Technology Extension and Service Center, Shanghai 201103, China

#Co-first author

*Corresponding author: 605591791@qq.com

Received date: 2020-11-17

  Online published: 2021-03-20

摘要

以上海近年推广种植的8个软米品种为试验材料,对稻米品质进行了相关性分析和主成分分析。结果表明,8个软米品种均未达到部颁优质稻米标准,主要是因为透明度、胶稠度、直链淀粉含量3项指标未达到部颁优质米标准。各性状相关性分析复杂,整精米率与粒长呈极显著负相关,糙米率和碱消值呈显著负相关,胶稠度与蛋白质含量成显著负相关。主成分分析发现,前3个主成分累计贡献率达82.795%,整精米率、糙米率、垩白度、胶稠度、碱消值为最有代表性的品质指标。

本文引用格式

李茂柏, 王萃, 顾玉龙, 李刚, 王冬兰, 余飞宇 . 上海软米品种品质性状分析与评价[J]. 中国稻米, 2021 , 27(2) : 77 -79 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.02.016

Abstract

Through principle component analysis and correlation analysis, the quality characters of eight soft rice varieties popularized in Shanghai in recent years were tested and analyzed. The results showed that none of the eight soft rice varieties reaching the standards of fine quality rice issued by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, mainly because the three indicators of the improper transparency, gel consistency and amylose content failed to meet the high-quality rice standards. There were complicated correlations between grain quality traits. There was a very significant negative correlation between the head rice rate and grain length. There was significant negative correlation between brown rice rate and alkali spreading value, gel consistency and protein content. It was found that the cumulative contribution rate of the first three principal components reached 82.795%, and the whole rice rate, brown rice rate, chalkiness degree, gel consistency and alkali spreading value were the most representative quality indicators by principal component analysis.

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T593-2013食用稻品种品质[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
[2] 唐永红,张嵩,高如嵩,等. 水稻结实期米质动态变化研究[J]. 中国水稻科学,1997,11(1):8-32.
[3] 罗玉坤,施一平,闵捷,等. 中国食用优质米品质的分析研究[J]. 浙江农业学报,1991(2):55-60.
[4] 朱大伟,张洪程,郭保卫,等. 中国软米的发展及展望[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2015,36(1):47-52.
[5] 徐绍忠,毛孝强,陈升位,等. 云南软米育成品种品质分析与鉴定[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,33(3):380-383.
[6] 李铮友. 滇型软米杂交籼稻的选育进展[J]. 杂交水稻,2001,16(5):16.
[7] 张建军,李天朱,文东. 日本粳稻品种品质性状的相关分析[J]. 四川农业大学学报,2004,22(3):209-212.
[8] 牛付安,程灿,周继华,等. 上海市粳稻品种品质性状的主成分分析和聚类分析[J]. 上海农业学报,2014,30(1):26-30.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发