专论与研究

盐胁迫对粳稻品种生长和生理特性的影响

展开
  • 中国水稻研究所/水稻生物学国家重点实验室,杭州 310006
*通讯作者:zhangjunhua@caas.cn

收稿日期: 2020-12-24

  网络出版日期: 2021-05-20

Effects of Salt Stress on Elements Absorption and Stress Resistance of Japonica Rice Varieties

Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology/China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China
*Corresponding author: zhangjunhua@caas.cn

Received date: 2020-12-24

  Online published: 2021-05-20

摘要

以津原85、金穗26、隆粳27、辽粳763为试验材料,研究了不同盐胁迫浓度对这4个品种生长和抗逆性的影响,以期为盐碱地适宜水稻品种的筛选提供理论参考。结果表明,盐胁迫显著抑制水稻幼苗的生长,金穗26受到的影响最小。在盐胁迫下,津原85离子选择吸收性较强,有利于提高耐盐性。盐胁迫对水稻的主要伤害是破坏膜质结构,进而影响细胞正常功能。盐胁迫浓度较高时,细胞丙二醛含量表现为辽粳763>隆粳27>津原85>金穗26。耐盐性水稻品种和盐敏感水稻品种的过氧化氢酶活性也有差别。综合来看,耐盐性高低依次表现为金穗26>津原85>隆粳27>辽粳763。

本文引用格式

黄洁, 黄晶, 梁青铎, 金千瑜, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 朱春权, 孔亚丽, 张均华 . 盐胁迫对粳稻品种生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2021 , 27(3) : 37 -40 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.03.007

Abstract

The effects of different salt stress concentrations on the growth and stress resistance of four japonica rice varieties Jinyuan 85, Jinsui 26, Longgeng 27, Liaogeng 763 were studied, in order to provide a theoretical reference for the screening of suitable rice varieties in saline-alkali land. The results showed that salt stress significantly inhibited the growth of rice seedlings, and the growth of Jinsui 26 seedlings was the least affected by salt. Under salt stress, Jinyuan 85 ion had strong selective absorption, which is beneficial to improve its salt tolerance. The main damage of salt stress to rice was that salt stress destroys the membrane structure and further affects the normal function of cells. When the salt stress concentration was higher, the MDA content of the cells was Liaogeng 763>Longgeng 27>Jinyuan 85>Jinsui 26. There were also differences in catalase activity between salt tolerant rice and salt sensitive rice. Taken together, the order of salt tolerance was Jinsui 26> Jinyuan 85> Longgeng 27> Liaogeng 763.

参考文献

[1] METTERNICHT G I, ZINCK J A.Remote sensing of soil salinity: potentials and constraints[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 85(1): 1-20.
[2] FAO Statistical Pocket Book [DB/OL]. Rome 2015, .
[3] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴2017[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社,2017.
[4] 李小兵,黎华寿,张泽民,等. 水稻盐分胁迫研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学,2014,41(12):6-11.
[5] MUNNS R, TESTER M.Mechanisms of salinity tolerance[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2008, 59(1): 651-681.
[6] 张强,赵文娟,陈卫峰,等. 盐碱地修复与保育研究进展[J]. 天津农业科学,2018,24(4):65-70.
[7] 孙明法,严国红,王爱民,等. 水稻耐盐育种研究进展[J]. 大麦与谷类科学,2017,34(4):1-9.
[8] 李金军,刘明放,陆金根,等. 粳稻穗期耐高温鉴定技术的研究[J]. 上海农业学报,2003,19(4):25-27.
[9] FORMENTIN E, SUDIRO C, RONCI M B, et al. H2O2 signature and innate antioxidative profile make the difference between sensitivity and tolerance to salt in rice cells[J]. Front Plant Science, 2018, 9: 1 485-1 549.
[10] 叶喜文,马德全. 测土配方施肥技术手册[M]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨地图出版社,2008.
[11] 刘祖祺,张石城. 植物抗性生理学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,1994:371.
[12] 王旭明,麦绮君,周洪凯,等. 盐胁迫对4个水稻种质抗逆性生理的影响[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报,2019,27(2):149-156.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发