
中国考古改变稻作起源和中华文明认知
Consensus Change of Rice Cultivation Origination and Chinese Civilization by Archaeology in China
Author: zhengzira@qq.com
Received date: 2021-05-17
Online published: 2021-07-20
郑云飞 . 中国考古改变稻作起源和中华文明认知[J]. 中国稻米, 2021 , 27(4) : 12 -16 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.04.004
Rice cultivation is the major basis for developing civilization in East Asia. A large number of archaeological remains of rice unearthed at Hemudu site in the 1970s proved that rice cultivation originats in China, which is different from the origin in India in common cognition past. It also suggested that the Yangtze regions, like the Yellow River regions, is one of the birthplaces of Chinese civilization. Recent discoveries of the archaeological Ruins of Liangzhu City, the rice remains over 10 000 years old, and huge paddy fields have filled many gaps in the history of Chinese civilization, and constantly updated the understanding of the origin of rice cultivation, being traced back to 10 000 years ago in the middle and lower regions of the Yangtze in international consensus. Multi-disciplinary archaeologies such as archaeobotany and archaeological paddy fields play an increasingly important role in explaining the process of Chinese civilization and the establishing civilized society.
| [1] | 任本命. 尼古拉·伊万诺维奇·瓦维洛夫[J]. 遗传,2003(6):3-4. |
| [2] | 瓦维洛夫H. N. 主要栽培植物的世界起源中[M]. 董玉琛译. 北京:农业出版社,1982. |
| [3] | MITTRE V, Palaeobotanieal evidence in India[M]. HUTCHINSON S J, ed. Evolutionary Studies in World Crops: Diversity and Change in the Indian Sub-continent. England: Cambridge University Press, 1974. |
| [4] | 加藤茂苞,丸山吉雄. 稻之不同种类间类缘之血清学研究[J]. 九州帝国大学农学部学艺杂志,1928,3:1 |
| [5] | 加藤茂苞,小坂博. 由杂种植物之结实度所见之稻品种之类缘[J]. 九州帝国大学农学部学艺杂志,1928,3:2. |
| [6] | 渡部忠世著. 稻米之路[M]. 尹绍亭译. 云南:云南人民出版社,1982. |
| [7] | 中川原捷洋,稲と稲作のふるさと[M]. 古今書店,1985. |
| [8] | 丁颖. 中国稻之起源[J]. 中山大学农学院农艺专刊,1949,7. |
| [9] | 丁颖. 中国栽培稻种的起源及其演变[J]. 农业学报,1957,8(3):243-260. |
| [10] | 丁颖. 中国古来粳籼稻种栽培及分布之探讨与栽培稻种分类法预报[J]. 中山大学农学院农艺专刊,1949,6. |
| [11] | ANDERSSON J G. Children of the Yellow Earth: Studies in Prehistoric China[M]. Landon: Broadway House, 1934. |
| [12] | 丁颖. 江汉平原新石器时代红烧土中的稻谷壳考查[J]. 考古学报,1959(4):31-34. |
| [13] | 浙江省文物管理委员会,浙江博物馆. 河姆渡遗址第一期发掘报告[J]. 考古学报,1978(1):39-110. |
| [14] | 游修龄. 对河姆渡遗址第四文化层出土稻谷和骨耜的几点看法[J]. 文物,1976(4):20-23. |
| [15] | 游修龄. 从河姆渡遗址出土稻谷试论我国栽培稻的起源、分化与传播[J]. 作物学报,1979,5(3):1-10. |
| [16] | 湖南省考古研究所.湖南澧县彭头山新石器时代早期遗址发掘简报[J]. 文物,1990(8):17-29. |
| [17] | 张文绪,裴安平. 澧县梦溪八十垱出土稻谷的研究[J]. 文物,1996(8):36-41. |
| [18] | 顾海滨. 湖南澄县城头山遗址出土的新石器时代水稻及其类型[J]. 考古,1996(8):81-89. |
| [19] | 张文绪,袁家荣. 湖南道县玉蟾岩古栽培稻的初步研究[J]. 作物学报,1998,24(4):416-420. |
| [20] | ZHAO Z J. The Middle Yangtze region in China is one place where rice was domesticated: Phytolith evidence from the Diaotonghuan Cave, Northern Jiangxi[J]. Antiquity, 1998, 72(278): 885-897. |
| [21] | 郑云飞,蒋乐平,郑建明. 浙江跨湖桥遗址的古稻遗存研究[J]. 中国水稻科学,2004,18(2):119-124. |
| [22] | 郑云飞,蒋乐平. 上山遗址出土的古稻遗存及其意义[J]. 考古,2007(9):19-25. |
| [23] | 浙江省文物考古研究所.上山文化:发现与记述[M]. 北京:文物出版社,2016. |
| [24] | ZHENG Y, CRAWFORD G W, JIANG L, et al. Rice domestication revealed by reduced shattering of archaeological rice from the lower yangtze valley[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 28136. |
| [25] | 严文明. 再论中国稻作农业的起源[J]. 农业考古,1989(2):72-83. |
| [26] | HUANG X H, KURATA, N, WEI X H. A map of rice genome variation revealsthe origin of cultivated rice[J]. Nature, 2012, 490: 497-501. |
| [27] | 郑云飞,陈旭高. 甜瓜起源的考古学研究——从长江下游出土的甜瓜属(Cucumis)种子谈起[A] // 浙江省文物考古研究所学刊:第八辑. 北京:科学出版社,2006:578-585. |
| [28] | ZHENG Y, CRAWFORD G W, CHEN X. Archaeological evidence for peach (Prunus persica) cultivation and domestication in China[J]. PLoS One, 2014, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106595. |
| [29] | 郑云飞,.陈旭高, 丁品. 浙江余杭茅山遗址古稻田耕作遗迹研究[J]. 第四纪研究,2014,34(1):85-96. |
| [30] | 郑云飞. 良渚文化时期的社会生业形态与稻作农业[J].南方文物, 2018(1):93-101. |
| [31] | 刘斌,王宁远,郑云飞,等. 2006—2013年良渚古城考古的主要收获[J]. 东南文化,2014(4):31-38. |
| [32] | 王宁远. 杭州市良渚古城外围水利系统的考古调查[J]. 考古,2015(1):3-13. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |