
我国近20年稻米品质优质率状况分析
收稿日期: 2021-05-12
网络出版日期: 2021-07-20
基金资助
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(CPSIBRF-CNRRI-202125;CPSIBRF-CNRRI-202126);国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金(CARS-01-47)
Analysis on High Quality Rate of Rice in China during Recent 20 Years
Received date: 2021-05-12
Online published: 2021-07-20
分析了2001—2020年来自我国各地的62 217份稻米样品的优质率。结果表明,“十三五”期间,我国水稻品种稻米优质率提升迅速,从2015年的27.3%快速增加到2020年的49.2%;21世纪初期,粳稻品种稻米优质率明显高于籼稻品种稻米,但两者品质差距不断缩小;垩白度是21世纪初期限制稻米优质率的主要品质指标,但“十三五”期间有明显的提升,其优质率超过了整精米率、直链淀粉含量等指标的优质率,已经不是限制稻米优质率的最重要因素;整精米率整体表现不佳,优质率较低,“十三五”期间已经成为7项定级指标中优质率最低的指标,是限制稻米优质率的重要指标。因此,提高我国稻米的整精米率,是今后我国水稻品质育种的重要目标之一。
胡贤巧, 张卫星, 邵雅芳, 于永红, 卢林, 陈铭学 . 我国近20年稻米品质优质率状况分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2021 , 27(4) : 84 -87 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.04.017
62 217 rice variety samples from all parts of China during recent 20 years were analyzed with respect to high quality rate. The results showed, during the“13th Five-Year Plan” period, high quality rate of rice in China rose rapidly from 27.3% in 2015 to 49.2% in 2020. In the early 21st century, high quality rate of japonica rice was much higher than that of indica rice. However, the gap of high quality rate between indica rice and japonica rice has been narrowing. Chalkiness was the most important quality indicator that limited the high quality rate in the early 21st century. During the“13th Five-Year Plan” period, it had been obviously improved and had higher high quality rate than head rice rate and amylose content, no longer the most important factor to limit high quality rate. Relatively poor performance was observed for head rice rate. Among seven grade indicators, head rice rate possessed lowest high quality rate, becoming the most important quality indicator that limited high quality rate during the “13th Five-Year Plan” period. Therefore, in order to improve the quality of rice in China, it is important to improve head rice rate in the future
Key words: rice; quality; high quality rate; China
| [1] | 吴浩宁,胡胜德. 消费者对优质稻米购买意愿的影响因素分析[J]. 中国商论,2016(2):107-110. |
| [2] | 金连登,许立. 当前我国优质稻米生产现状及发展对策[J]. 中国稻米,2000,6(3):7-10. |
| [3] | 闵捷,朱智伟,陈能,等. 中国常规籼稻品种的米质及其优质达标率的研究[J]. 中国稻米,2012,18(5):4-7. |
| [4] | 闵捷,朱智伟,许立,等. 中国杂交粳稻的米质及优质达标率研究[J]. 杂交水稻, 2007,22(1): 67-70. |
| [5] | 闵捷,汤圣祥,施建华,等. 中国20世纪80年代以来育成糯稻品种的品质及其优质达标率分析[J]. 中国农业科学,2010,43(1):12-19. |
| [6] | 闵捷,朱智伟,孙成效,等. 中国主栽杂交籼稻的米质状况分析[J]. 杂交水稻,2015,30(6):71-74. |
| [7] | 闵捷,朱智伟,金连登,等. 中国近25年来育成杂交籼稻组合的米质分析[J]. 中国水稻科学,2011,25(2):201-205. |
| [8] | 朱智伟,陈能,王丹英,等. 不同类型水稻品质性状变异特性及差异性分析[J]. 中国水稻科学,2004,18(4):37-42. |
| [9] | NY/T 83-2017《米质测定方法》[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2017. |
| [10] | NY/T 593-2013《食用稻品种品质》[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2013. |
| [11] | 张家秀. 浅谈我国优质稻米产业的现状及其发展[J]. 粮食加工,2008,33(3):49-50. |
| [12] | 李茂柏,王萃,顾玉龙,等. 上海软米品种品质性状分析与评价[J]. 中国稻米,2021,27(2):77-79. |
| [13] | 徐绍忠,毛孝强,陈升位,等. 云南软米育成品种品质的分析与鉴定[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,33(3):380-383. |
| [14] | 曾亚文,申时全,徐绍忠,等. 云南软米低直链淀粉含量及其相关性状遗传分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2004,5(1):12-16. |
| [15] | 陈庭木,王宝祥,胡明珠,等. 水稻低直链淀粉资源筛选[J]. 中国农学通报,2021,37(5):21-25. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |