专论与研究

我国水稻三大优势产区稻米品质现状及区域差异

展开
  • 1中国水稻研究所/农业农村部稻米及制品质量监督检验测试中心,杭州 310006
    2浙江省农业科学院 农产品质量安全与营养研究所,杭州 310021

第一作者:zhangwxcnrri@163.com

*通讯作者:zwzhu80@126.com

收稿日期: 2021-07-24

  网络出版日期: 2021-09-20

基金资助

中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(CPSIBRF-CNRRI-202125);国家粮食产品质量安全专项监测项目(2016—2020);浙江省部共建国家重点实验室开放基金项目(2010DS700124-KF1817)

Current Situation and Regional Difference of Rice Grain Quality in Three Rice-Production Superiority Areas of China

Expand
  • 1China National Rice Research Institute/Rice Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou 310006, China
    2Institute of Quality Safety and Nutrition of Agricultural Products, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

1st author: zhangwxcnrri@163.com

*Corresponding author: zwzhu80@126.com

Received date: 2021-07-24

  Online published: 2021-09-20

摘要

为全面科学了解我国水稻三大优势产区稻米品质现状及区域差异,采取网格化布局和分层随机抽样方法,于2016—2020年在全国17个水稻主产省的455个重点县抽取5 879份稻谷样品,研究分析了12项品质性状和优质率。结果显示,近5年我国稻米总体优质率为35.96%,粳稻优质率(54.02%)明显高于籼稻(27.30%),中晚稻优质率(41.43%)显著高于早稻(10.13%),年度间优质率有变化,2016年为26.86%,2017年为38.30%,2018年为38.61%,2019年为38.79%,2020年为33.33%;区域间优质率差异明显,东北平原为71.38%,显著高于东南沿海的30.83%和长江流域的25.78%。东北三省优质率最高(黑龙江、吉林、辽宁分别为69.65%、75.13%、76.87%),其次是华南两广(广东37.20%、广西31.92%)、江淮地区(江苏31.88%、安徽34.88%、河南33.57%)和云贵高原(贵州31.16%、云南24.76%),川渝盆地和湘赣平原优质率有待提升。总体而言,东北平原稻米品质各项指标表现较为适宜,长江流域和东南沿海整精米率低、垩白多,是限制稻米优质率提高的主要因素。整精米率优质达标率总体仅为54.82%,东北平原、长江流域和东南沿海三大优势产区分别为84.59%、47.74%、46.17%,因此,整精米率不仅是我国稻米品质地区差异的关键因子之一,也是今后南方水稻优质育种和栽培的重要攻关目标。

本文引用格式

张卫星, 马晨怡, 袁玉伟, 张伟贵, 胡贤巧, 陈铭学, 朱智伟 . 我国水稻三大优势产区稻米品质现状及区域差异[J]. 中国稻米, 2021 , 27(5) : 12 -18 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.05.003

Abstract

To comprehensively and scientifically understand the current situation of rice quality and regional difference of three rice-production superiority areas in China, we collected a total of 5 879 rice samples by grid geographical layout and stratified random sampling from 455 key counties in 17 major rice production provinces of China during 2016—2020, and analyzed 12 quality traits and the ratio of good quality of those samples. The results showed that the ratio of good quality of Chinese rice samples in the past 5 years was 35.96%, the good quality rate of japonica rice(54.02%) was much higher than that of indica rice(27.30%), and the good quality rate of middle-late rice (41.43%) was significantly higher than that of early rice (10.13%). There were variations in the ratio of good quality of rice among different years (26.86% in 2016, 38.30% in 2017, 38.61% in 2018, 38.79% in 2019 and 33.33% in 2020), and the difference of good quality rate among regions was obvious (71.38% in the Northeast Plain, which was significantly higher than 30.83% of the Southeast Coast and 25.78% of the Yangtze River Basin). Northeast China had the highest ratio of good quality (69.65%, 75.13%, 76.87% in Heilongjiang, Jilin and Liaoning, respectively), followed by South China (37.20% in Guangdong and 31.92% in Guangxi), Jianghuai region (31.88% in Jiangsu, 34.88% in Anhui and 33.57% in Henan) and the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau(31.16% in Guizhou, and 24.76% in Yunnan), and the ratio of good quality in the Sichuan-Chongqing Basin and the Hunan-Jiangsi Plain still need to be improved. In general, various indicators of rice quality in the Northeast Plain were relatively proper, however, the low head rice rate and high chalkiness degree, which are the dominant factors, limited the ratio of good quality of rice in the Yangtze River Basin and the coast of Southeast China. Only 54.82% of the samples' head rice rate reached the good quality standard, the percentages of big three production superiority areas are 84.59%, 47.74%, and 46.17% respectively. Therefore, head rice rate is one of the key factors of regional difference of rice quality in China, and high head rice rate is considered as an important objective to achieve for good quality rice breeding and cultivation in southern China.

参考文献

[1] 胡培松,翟虎渠,万建民. 中国水稻生产新特点与稻米品质改良[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2002,4(4):33-39.
[2] 张卫星,金连登,朱智伟,等. 我国稻米产销现状与供应形势[J]. 粮油食品科技,2009,17(4):1-5.
[3] 徐春春,纪龙,陈中督,等. 中国水稻生产、市场与进出口贸易的回顾与展望[J]. 中国稻米,2021,27(4):17-21.
[4] 朱智伟,陈能,王丹英,等. 不同类型水稻品种品质性状变异特性及差异性分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2004,18(4):315-320.
[5] 朱德峰,张玉屏,陈惠哲,等. 中国水稻栽培技术发展与展望[J]. 中国稻米,2021,27(4):45-49.
[6] 罗玉坤,朱智伟,金连登,等. 从普查结果看我国水稻品种品质的现状[J]. 中国稻米,2002,8(1):5-9.
[7] 罗玉坤,朱智伟,陈能,等. 中国主要稻米的粒型及其品质特性[J]. 中国水稻科学,2004,18(2): 135-139.
[8] 朱智伟. 当前我国稻米品质状况分析[J]. 中国稻米,2006,12(1):1-4.
[9] 闵捷,朱智伟,许立,等. 中国杂交粳稻的米质及优质达标率研究[J]. 杂交水稻,2007,22(1):67-70.
[10] 闵捷,朱智伟,许立,等. 我国20世纪80年代以来育成粳稻品种的米质及优质达标率分析[J]. 中国稻米,2008,14(5):1-4.
[11] 闵捷,汤圣祥,施建华,等. 中国20世纪80年代以来育成糯稻品种的品质及其优质达标率分析[J]. 中国农业科学,2010,43(1):12-19.
[12] 闵捷,朱智伟,金连登,等. 中国近25年来育成杂交籼稻组合的米质分析[J]. 中国水稻科学,2011,25(2):201-205.
[13] 闵捷,朱智伟,陈能,等. 中国常规籼稻品种的米质及其优质达标率的研究[J]. 中国稻米,2012,18(5):4-7.
[14] 闵捷,朱智伟,章林平,等. 中国超级杂交稻组合的稻米品质分析[J]. 中国水稻科学,2014,28(2): 206-210.
[15] 闵捷,朱智伟,孙成效,等. 中国主栽杂交籼稻的米质状况分析[J]. 杂交水稻,2015,30(6):71-74.
[16] 胡贤巧,张卫星,邵雅芳,等. 我国近20年稻米品质优质率状况分析[J]. 中国稻米,2021,27(4):84-87.
[17] 卢林,朱智伟,段彬伍. 利用AMMI模型分析我国杂交籼稻整精米率[J]. 中国水稻科学,2012,26(5): 624-628.
[18] 卢林,朱智伟,段彬伍,等. 我国稻米整精米率特点及环境影响因素分析[J]. 核农学报,2012,26(5): 770-774.
[19] 农业部. GB/T 5491-1985. 粮食、油料检验扦样、分样法[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,1985.
[20] 农业部. NY/T 83-2017. 米质测定方法[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
[21] 农业部. NY/T 593-2013. 食用稻品种品质[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发