品种与技术

早籼稻机插秧同步侧深施肥模式研究

展开
  • 1庐江县农业技术推广中心,安徽 庐江 231500
    2庐江县金牛镇农机管理站,安徽 庐江 231521
    3安徽省农业科学院 水稻研究所,合肥 230031

收稿日期: 2021-10-22

  网络出版日期: 2022-03-17

基金资助

国家重点研发计划“粮食丰产增效科技创新重点专项”(2018YFD0300904);国家重点研发计划“粮食丰产增效科技创新重点专项”(2018YFD0300900);国家重点研发计划“粮食丰产增效科技创新重点专项”(2017 YFD0301304);农业农村部2019年绿色高质高效创建项目

Study of Pattern on Synchronous Side Deep Fertilization of Mechanical Transplanting in Early Indica Rice

Expand
  • 1Lujiang Agricultural Technology Promotion Center, Lujiang, Anhui 231500, China
    2Jinniu Town Agricultural Machinery Management Station, Lujiang, Anhui 231521, China
    3Rice Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

Received date: 2021-10-22

  Online published: 2022-03-17

摘要

以常规早籼稻品种浙辐203为试验材料,研究了不同施肥模式和施肥量水平对早籼稻产量和产量构成、大田茎蘖发育动态、肥料利用效率、生产成本和收益等指标的影响,以期筛选和优化早籼稻机插秧同步侧深施肥的高产高效施肥模式。结果表明,常规肥料同步侧深施肥模式(A1)在产量水平、产值、经济收益和肥料农学效率等指标上均优于专用控释肥料同步侧深施肥模式(A2),高于或接近机插秧常规高产栽培模式(CK1),显著高于省工栽培模式(CK2);生产成本显著低于A2和CK1;化肥全部减量15%的处理(B2)在产量、产值和经济收益方面高于化肥全量处理(B1),显著高于减量30%的处理(B3),产量和效益高于CK1。经综合比较,适宜早籼稻采用的毯苗机插侧深施肥模式为:普通肥料减量15%(纯N 166.5 kg/hm2,P2O5 70.5 kg/hm2,K2O 141.0 kg/hm2),机插同步侧深施用77% N、100% P和65% K,人工撒施23% N和35% K作穗肥。

本文引用格式

吕和平, 吴晨阳, 潘志军, 周兵, 吴小文, 张小红, 余绪来, 许有尊, 吴文革 . 早籼稻机插秧同步侧深施肥模式研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2022 , 28(2) : 82 -87 . DOI: 10.3969/j.ssn.1006-8082.2022.02.017

Abstract

In order to screen and optimize the high-yield and high-efficiency fertilization model of synchronous side-deep fertilization for mechanical transplanting of early indica rice, taking conventional early indica rice variety Zhefu 203 as test material, the effects of different fertilization patterns and fertilization rates on the yield and yield components, the dynamics of stem and tiller development, fertilizer efficiency and production cost of early indica rice were studied. The results showed that model of synchronous side-deep fertilization with conventional fertilizers (A1) was superior to the model of synchronous side deep fertilization with special controlled-release fertilizers (A2) in terms of yield level, output value, economic benefits and fertilizer agronomic efficiency, and was higher than or close to the conventional high-yield cultivation model (CK1), significantly higher than the labor-saving cultivation model (CK2); the production cost is significantly lower than A2 and CK1. Among the three fertilization levels, the yield, output value and economic benefits of the 15% fertilizer reduction treatment (B2) was higher than full fertilizer treatment (B1), and significantly higher than 30% fertilizer reduction treatment (B3), and the yield and efficiency are higher than CK1. Through comprehensive comparison, the high-yield and high-efficiency fertilization model with synchronous side-deep fertilization for mechanical transplanting of early indica rice was as follows: 15% reduction of common fertilizer (pure N 166.5 kg/hm 2, P2O5 70.5 kg/ hm2, K2O 141.0 kg/hm2), 77% N, 100% P and 65% K applied simultaneously at the side of machine, and artificial spreaded 23% N and 35% K in heading stage.

参考文献

[1] 吴晨阳, 潘志军, 吕和平, 等. 不同肥料运筹模式对江淮地区机插双季早稻产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(6):6-10.
[2] 位国建, 荐世春, 崔荣江, 等. 水稻机插秧同步侧深施肥技术分析及试验[J]. 农机化研究, 2017, 39(9):190-194.
[3] 吴红星, 王宏斌, 吴文革, 等. 江淮地区水稻机插秧同步侧深施肥技术研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(8):3-4.
[4] 彭少兵, 黄见良, 钟旭华, 等. 提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(9):1 095-1 103.
[5] 吕亚敏, 吴玉红, 李洪达, 等. 减肥措施对稻田田面水氮、磷动态变化特征的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(4):349-355.
[6] 张颖. 水稻机械化插秧同步侧深施肥内容及技术要点[J]. 农技服务, 2019, 36(5):69.
[7] 赵红玉, 徐寿军, 杨成林, 等. 侧深施肥技术对寒地水稻生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 32(4):347.
[8] 马昕, 杨艳明, 刘智蕾, 等. 机械侧深施控释掺混肥提高寒地水稻的产量和效益[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(4):1 095-1 103.
[9] 杨成林, 王丽妍, 赵红玉. 侧深施肥对寒地水稻产量及肥料利用率的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2017, 44(8):61-65.
[10] 朱从桦, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 等. 机械侧深施肥对机插早稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(1):40-43.
[11] 毛伟, 李文西, 唐宝国, 等. 县级测土配方施肥指标体系建立研究-以江苏省江都市水稻为例[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(2):396-406.
[12] NOVOA R, LOOMS R S. Nitrogen and plant production[J]. Plant and Soil, 1981, 58:177-204.
[13] 李韵珠, 王凤仙, 黄元仿. 土壤水分和养分利用效率几种定义的比较[J]. 土壤通报, 2000, 31(4):150-155.
[14] 李子建, 马德仲. 应用侧深施肥技术实现水稻绿色安全生产的调查分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(11):48-51.
[15] XU J Z, LIAO L X, TAN J Y, et al. Ammonia volatilization in gemmiparous and early seedling stages from direct seeding rice fields with different nitrogen management strategies: A pots experiment[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2013, 126:169-176.
[16] 朱兆良, 张绍林, 尹斌, 等. 太湖地区单季晚稻产量-氮肥施用量反应曲线的历史比较[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(1):1-5.
[17] 薛利红, 杨林章, 施卫明, 等. 农村面源污染治理的“4R”理论与工程实践——源头减量技术[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2013, 32(5):881-888.
[18] 赵秉强, 许秀成. 加快建设中国特色缓释肥料技术体系,推动缓释肥料产业健康发展[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2010, 25(4):12-14.
[19] 唐拴虎, 徐培智, 张发宝, 等. 一次性施用控释肥对水稻植株生长及产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12(2):177-182.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发