品种与技术

不同栽培方式下缓释肥施用对水稻生长特性及产量的影响

展开
  • 1三峡大学 水利与环境学院,湖北 宜昌 443002
    2三峡大学/三峡库区生态环境教育部工程研究中心,湖北 宜昌 443002
    3湖北省漳河工程管理局,湖北 荆门 448156

收稿日期: 2021-10-10

  网络出版日期: 2022-05-24

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1508302);湖北省水利重点科研项目(HBSLKY201801)

Effects of Slow-release Fertilizer Application on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Rice under Different Cultivation Methods

Expand
  • 1College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
    2Engineering Research Center of Ecoenvironment in Three Gorges Reservoir Region, Ministry of Education/China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
    3Hubei Zhanghe Hydraulic Project Administration Bureau, Jingmen, Hubei 448156, China;
ZHOU Jieyu, zhoujieyu1324@163.com

Received date: 2021-10-10

  Online published: 2022-05-24

摘要

为探明不同栽培方式下施用缓释肥对水稻生长及产量的影响,选取湖北省漳河灌区为研究区域,设置“移栽+常规肥”(F1N1)、“移栽+缓释肥”(F1N2)、“直播+常规肥”(F2N1)和“直播+缓释肥”(F2N2)4个处理,以水稻品种钻两优超占为试验材料开展小区试验。结果表明,F1N2处理对水稻株高促进作用最强,黄熟期可达127.6 cm,比F2N1处理高15.6 cm,且差异达极显著水平;F1N2处理对水稻分蘖促进作用极显著,每丛最多可达28.6个,而F2N2仅为11.7个;F1N2处理水稻产量为7 536 kg/hm2,比F2N2处理高13.3%,比F1N1、F2N1处理产量分别高出21.2%和28.2%。

本文引用格式

周洁宇, 何军, 李杜白, 赵树君, 钟韵, 杨鹏, 张宇航, 钟盛建, 赵帆, 马煜, 任志文 . 不同栽培方式下缓释肥施用对水稻生长特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2022 , 28(3) : 92 -95 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2022.03.018

Abstract

In order to explore the effects of slow-release fertilizers on rice growth and yield under different cultivation methods, the Zhanghe Irrigation District in Hubei Province was selected as the research area, and four treatments including “transplanting + conventional fertilizer” (F1N1), “transplanting + slow-release fertilizer”(F1N2), “direct seeding + conventional fertilizer” (F2N1)and “direct seeding + slow-release fertilizer”(F2N2) were set up, and the plot experiment was carried out with rice variety Zhuanliangyou Chaozhan as the experimental material. The results showed that F1N2 treatment had the best effect on rice plant height, reaching 127.6 cm at the yellow maturity stage, which was 15.6 cm higher than the F2N1 treatment, and the difference reached a very significant level. F1N2 treatment had a very significant effect on rice tiller promotion, up to 28.6 per clumps, while F2N2 only 11.7. The rice yield of F1N2 treatment was 7 536 kg/hm2, which was 13.3% higher than that of F2N2 treatment, and 21.2% and 28.2% higher than that of F1N1 and F2N1 treatments, respectively.

参考文献

[1] 何军, 崔远来, 吕露, 等. 不同水肥调控模式对稻田土壤氮磷肥力的影响试验[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2011, 30(4):1-4.
[2] 傅丽青, 薛占奎, 房玉伟, 等. 不同缓/控释肥对单、双季晚稻生产特性及经济效益的影响[J]. 福建农业学报, 2017, 32(6):577-582.
[3] 陈蕾, 高山雪, ZHOU George. 施加炭基缓释肥对土壤氮素流失的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(6):53-57.
[4] 何军, 钟盛建, 张宇航, 等. 缓释肥条件节水灌溉对水稻生态特性及产量的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2020(4):17-20.
[5] 李世发, 刘元英, 范立春, 等. 缓释肥对水稻生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2008, 39(7):38-43.
[6] HE H B, MA F Y, YANG R, et al. Rice performance and water use efficiency under plastic mulching with drip irrigation.[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e83103.
[7] HE H B, YANG R, WU L Q, et al. The growth characteristics and yield potential of rice (Oryza sativa) under non-flooded irrigation in arid region[J]. Annals of Applied Biology, 2016, 168(3): 337-356.
[8] 黄珊. 水稻直播生产效益分析及栽培技术[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2017, 23(suppl1):18-19.
[9] 罗锡文, 谢方平, 区颖刚, 等. 水稻生产不同栽植方式的比较试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2004, 20(1):136-139.
[10] 何瑞银, 罗汉亚, 李玉同, 等. 水稻不同种植方式的比较试验与评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(1):167-171.
[11] 马殿荣, 陈温福, 王庆祥, 等. 水稻乳苗抛栽与其他栽培方式的比较研究[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2003, 34(5):336-339.
[12] 程建平, 罗锡文, 樊启洲, 等. 不同种植方式对水稻生育特性和产量的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2010, 29(1):1-5.
[13] 凌启鸿. 关于水稻轻简栽培问题的探讨[J]. 中国稻米, 1997, 3(5):3-9.
[14] 李杰, 张洪程, 董洋阳, 等. 不同生态区栽培方式对水稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(13): 2661-2672.
[15] 许轲, 孙圳, 霍中洋, 等. 播期、品种类型对水稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(20): 4222-4233.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发