
不同稻田种养模式对水稻生长、二化螟及杂草的影响
收稿日期: 2022-09-21
网络出版日期: 2023-03-14
基金资助
国家重点研发计划项目“湘北优质水稻生态技术整合与示范”(2018YFD0301003)
Effects of Different Planting and Breeding Models on Rice Growth, Chilo suppressalis and Weeds
Received date: 2022-09-21
Online published: 2023-03-14
为探究不同稻田种养模式对水稻生长特性、二化螟及杂草防控效果的影响,设置稻田养牛蛙(DNW)、稻田养黑斑蛙(DW)、稻田养鱼(DY)和水稻单作(CK)4个处理,调查各处理水稻叶面积指数、干物质积累量、水稻产量及产量构成、二化螟虫口密度和杂草密度。结果表明,在齐穗期,DW处理的叶面积指数较CK显著增加15.23%;在水稻生长期DW处理对二化螟的防治效果为49.60%,杂草密度防治效果为73.78%,杂草干物质防治效果为76.44%,DW处理的杂草干物质量较CK显著下降。DW、DNW处理成熟期的穗干物质量较CK分别高3.21%和12.10%,但差异不显著。DW处理的有效穗数、穗粒数较CK显著增加19.45%和18.50%。水稻实际产量各处理间差异不显著,DW与CK一致,DNW比CK增产9.89%,稻蛙共作具有较好的稳产效果。综上所述,“稻-黑斑蛙”共生能提高水稻光合作用,减少二化螟危害和稻田杂草发生,达到稳定水稻产量、减少农药使用的目的。
罗雨聪, 王忍, 张印, 廖欣, 汤伟, 钟康裕, 黄璜, 陈灿 . 不同稻田种养模式对水稻生长、二化螟及杂草的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023 , 29(2) : 93 -97 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.02.019
In order to explore the effects of different planting and breeding models on rice growth characteristics, chilo suppressalis and weeds, four treatments were set: bullfrog rearing in paddy field (DNW), black-spotted frog in paddy field (DW), fish rearing in paddy field(DY) and rice monoculture (CK). The rice leaf area index, dry matter accumulation, rice yield and yield composition, chilo suppressalis population density and weed density were investigated. The results showed that the leaf area index of DW treatment increased significantly by 15.23% compared with CK at full heading stage. DW treatment had 49.60% control effect on chilo suppressalis, 73.78% control effect of weed density, and 76.44% control effect of weed dry matter in rice growth period. The weed dry matter weight of DW treatment was significantly lower than that of CK. The ear dry matter weight in mature stage of DW and DNW treatments were 3.21% and 12.10% higher than CK, but the difference was not significant. Compared with CK, the effective panicle and grain number per panicle increased by 19.45% and 18.50% in DW treatment, and the difference was significant. There was no significant difference in the rice yield among the different treatments, DW treatment was consistent with CK, and DNW treatment increased yield by 9.89% compared with CK, the rice-frog symbiosis had a good effect of stabilizing yield. To sum up, rice-black spotted frog symbiosis could improve rice photosynthesis, reduce the damage of rice borer and the occurrence of weeds in rice fields, and achieve the purpose of stabilizing rice yield and reducing the use of pesticides.
| [1] | 唐海明, 肖小平, 汤文光, 等. 湖南稻田现代农作制特征及发展对策[J]. 农业现代化研究 2016, 37(4):627-634. |
| [2] | 黄国勤, 周泉, 陈阜, 等. 长江中游地区水稻生产可持续发展战略研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2018, 39(1): 28-36. |
| [3] | 李文华, 成升魁, 梅旭荣, 等. 中国农业资源与环境可持续发展战略研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2016, 18(1):56-64. |
| [4] | 周兴兵, 刘茂, 张力, 等. 稻田养鱼模式下减量施氮对杂交中稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(1):80-83. |
| [5] | DWIYANA E, MENDOZA T C. Determinants of productivity and profitability of rice-fish farming systems[J]. Asia Life Sciences, 2008, 17(1): 21-42. |
| [6] | 吕广动, 黄璜, 王忍, 等. 紫云英还田耦合稻鱼共生对双季水稻群体生长特性及产量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(12):4057-4 067. |
| [7] | 梁玉刚, 李静怡, 王丹, 等. 垄作稻鱼鸡共生对水稻群体生长特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(11):165-175. |
| [8] | 张左生. 粮油作物病虫鼠害预测预报[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1994:8-268. |
| [9] | 陈洪俊, 黄国勤, 杨滨娟, 等. 冬种绿肥对早稻产量及稻田杂草群落的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(10):1976-1 984. |
| [10] | 孙永健, 郑洪帧, 徐徽, 等. 机械旱直播方式促进水稻生长发育提高产量[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(20):10-18. |
| [11] | 杨文治, 赵耀鹏, 徐小燕, 等. 水稻干物质生产特性及对高产的贡献[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2014(10):153-155. |
| [12] | 兰国俊, 胡雪峰, 程畅, 等. 稻鸭共生对土壤养分和水稻病虫害防控的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(5):1299-1 310. |
| [13] | 陈松, 谈孝凤, 宋宝静, 等. 贵州省稻蛙复合种养实践与农药减施增效路径探讨[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2018, 38(12):78-82. |
| [14] | 曹凑贵, 江洋, 汪金平, 等. 稻虾共作模式的“双刃性”及可持续发展策略[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(9):1245-1 253. |
| [15] | 刘全科, 周普国, 朱文达, 等. 稻虾共作模式对稻田杂草的控制效果及其经济效益[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(10):1859-1 862. |
| [16] | 吕东锋, 王武, 马旭洲, 等. 稻蟹共生对稻田杂草的生态防控试验研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2011, 50(8):1574-1 578. |
| [17] | 杨治平, 刘小燕, 黄璜, 等. 稻田养鸭对稻鸭复合系统中病、虫、草害及蜘蛛的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(12):2756-2 760. |
| [18] | XIE J, HU L, TANG J, et al. Ecological mechanisms underlying the sustainability of the agricultural heritage rice-fish coculture system[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(50): 1 381-1 387. |
| [19] | HU L, ZHANG J, REN W, et al. Can the co-cultivation of rice and fish help sustain rice production?[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 1-7. |
| [20] | 谢洪科, 邹朝晖, 刘功朋, 等. 不同蛙类及其密度对水稻性状和主要害虫的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2014, 26(6):21-25. |
| [21] | 秦钟, 章家恩, 骆世明, 等. 稻鸭共作系统生态服务功能价值的评估研究[J]. 资源科学, 2010, 32(5):864-872. |
| [22] | 李丽娜, 闫淋淋, 曹凑贵, 等. 稻虾共作系统中水稻生长及养分吸收对秸秆还田与投食的响应[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2020, 39(2):8-16. |
| [23] | 周江伟. 稻鳖鱼共生系统环境经济效应及其作用机制研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2018. |
| [24] | 滕青. 上海环淀山湖地区基于化肥、农药减量化的生态稻作模式研究[D]. 上海: 上海大学, 2016. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |