
施用不同石灰类物质对双季优质稻产量和品质的影响
收稿日期: 2022-11-14
网络出版日期: 2023-05-23
基金资助
井冈山农高区省级科技专项(20222-051246);国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0300903);国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD030 1102);江西省水稻产业技术体系专项(JXARS-02-03);中青年科技创新领军人才专项(赣科计字[2018]175号)
Effects of Different Lime Substances on Yield and Quality of Double Cropping Rice
Received date: 2022-11-14
Online published: 2023-05-23
南方双季稻区土壤酸化日益严重,已经成为制约水稻产量提升的主要因素之一。大量研究表明,施用石灰可以改良土壤酸化和提高水稻产量,但目前关于石灰施用对当地稻米品质的影响研究较少,且不同石灰类物质的施用效果是否存在差异还不是很清楚。于2021年在江西省典型酸性双季稻田上开展田间试验,旨在明确施用不同石灰类物质(氧化钙、氢氧化钙、碳酸钙)对优质稻(早稻为柒两优2012、晚稻为美香占2号)产量和米质的影响。结果表明,不同石灰类物质间的施用效果无显著差异,且施用石灰类物质对早稻产量、品质和氮素吸收亦无显著影响。但与不施石灰对照相比,施用氧化钙、氢氧化钙和碳酸钙处理的晚稻显著增产11.3%、17.3%和17.6%,氮素吸收显著增加16.6%、17.1%和13.5%,精米率和整精米率分别显著提高1.3%~2.1%和6.1%~6.3%,直链淀粉含量显著下降4.7%~4.8%。与不施石灰对照相比,施用氧化钙、氢氧化钙和碳酸钙处理的早季稻田土壤pH值分别显著提升0.52、0.42和0.50个单位,晚季稻田土壤pH分别显著提升0.41、0.57和0.48个单位。可见,在酸性双季稻田上施用石灰类物质,在改良土壤酸化的同时改善了晚稻的加工和食味品质。
陈雅慧, 杨星莲, 刘磊, 邵华, 曾勇军, 黄山, 潘晓华 . 施用不同石灰类物质对双季优质稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023 , 29(3) : 62 -66 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.03.011
Soil acidification is becoming more and more serious in the southern double cropping rice region, which has become one of the main factors restricting the increase of rice yield. A large number of studies have shown that the application of limes could significantly alleviate soil acidification and increase rice yield. However, there are few studies on the impact of lime application on rice quality, and it is not clear whether there are differences in the application effects of different lime substances. In 2021, a field experiment was conducted on a typical acidic double-cropping rice field in Jiangxi Province to clarify the effects of different lime substances (calcium oxide, calcium hydroxide, calcium carbonate) on the yield and quality of high-quality rice (Qiliangyou 2012 for early rice and Meixiangzhan 2 for late rice). The results showed that there was no significant difference in the application effects of different lime substances, and the application of limes had no significant effect on the yield, quality and nitrogen absorption uptake of early rice. However, compared with the control without lime application, the treatment with calcium oxide, calcium hydroxide and calcium carbonate significantly increased the yield of late rice by 11.3%, 17.3% and 17.6%, significantly increased the nitrogen absorption uptake by 16.6%, 17.1% and 13.5%, significantly increased the rate of milled rice and head rice by 1.3%-2.1% and 6.1%-6.3%, respectively, and significantly decreased the amylose content by 4.7%-4.8%. Compared with the control without lime application, the pH value of early rice paddy soil was significantly increased by 0.52, 0.42 and 0.50 units respectively, and 0.41, 0.57 and 0.48 units respectively in the treatment of late rice paddy soil in the treatment of calcium oxide, calcium hydroxide and calcium carbonate. It can be seen that the application of lime in acid rice fields can improve the processing and eating quality of late rice while improving soil acidification
Key words: double cropping rice; lime; grain yield; rice quality
| [1] | SHEN J B, CUI Z L, MIAO Y X, et al. Transforming agriculture in China: From solely high yield to both high yield and high resource use efficiency[J]. Global Food Security, 2013, 2(1):1-8. |
| [2] | 徐仁扣, 李九玉, 周世伟, 等. 我国农田土壤酸化调控的科学问题与技术措施[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(2):160-167. |
| [3] | HOLLAND J E, BENNETT A E, NEWTON A C, et al. Liming impacts on soils, crops and biodiversity in the UK: A review[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 610: 316-332. |
| [4] | AI C, LIANG G Q, SUN J W, et al. The alleviation of acid soil stress in rice by inorganic or organic ameliorants is associated with changes in soil enzyme activity and microbial community composition[J]. Biology and Fertility Soils, 2015, 51: 465-477. |
| [5] | 潘香玉. 施用石灰对稻田土壤pH值、水稻产量和重金属积累的影响[J]. 农业工程技术, 2020, 40(35):15-18. |
| [6] | 方爱莲, 钟国民, 方克明, 等, 施用石灰对重酸性稻田水稻生产的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2016, 6(10):27-30. |
| [7] | 廖萍, 唐军, 曾永军, 等. 生物炭和石灰对酸性稻田水稻产量、土壤性状和经济效益的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(1):44-48. |
| [8] | BOLAN N S, ADRIANO D C, CURTIN D. Soil acidification and liming interactions with nutrient and heavy metal transformation and bioavailability[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2003, 78: 215-272. |
| [9] | 鲍土旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008. |
| [10] | 李爱平, 文吉辉. 石灰用量对早稻产量及酸化土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2015(11):44-46. |
| [11] | 廖萍. 施石灰对双季稻系统氮素循环的影响及其作用机制[D]. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2020. |
| [12] | 李昊昱, 孟兆良, 庞党伟, 等. 周年秸秆还田对农田土壤固碳及冬小麦-夏玉米产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6):893-903. |
| [13] | LIAO P, HUANG S, VAN GESTEL N, et al. Liming and straw retention interact to increase nitrogen uptake and grain yield in a double rice-cropping system[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 216: 217-224. |
| [14] | PAGE K L, ALLEN D E, DALAL R C, et al. Processes and magnitude of CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes from liming of Australian acidic soils: A review[J]. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 2009, 47: 747-762. |
| [15] | 唐海明, 肖小平, 李超, 等. 不同土壤耕作模式对双季水稻生理特性与产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(5):740-754. |
| [16] | 廖萍, 刘磊, 何宇轩, 等. 施石灰和秸秆还田对双季稻产量和氮素吸收的互作效应[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(1):84-92. |
| [17] | 吕伟生, 肖富良, 韩德鹏, 等. 石灰对红壤稻田油菜秸秆腐解、养分释放及早稻产量的短期效应[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(6):69-73. |
| [18] | PAGANI A, MALLARINO A P. Soil pH and crop grain yield as affected by the source and rate of lime[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2012, 76(5): 1 877-1 886. |
| [19] | 武际, 郭熙盛, 鲁剑巍, 等. 不同水稻栽培模式下小麦秸秆腐解特征及对土壤生物学特性和养分状况的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(2):565-575. |
| [20] | 朱安, 高捷, 黄健, 等. 水稻根系形态生理及其与稻米品质关系的研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2020, 36(2):1-8. |
| [21] | FITZGERALD M A, MCCOUCH S R, HALL R D. Not just a grain of rice: the quest for quality[J]. Trends In Plant Science, 2009, 14(3): 133-139. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |