专论与研究

灌溉模式与施氮方式对北方粳稻产量及干物质积累的影响

展开
  • 1沈阳农业大学 农学院/作物生理研究所,沈阳 110866
    2中国水稻研究所,杭州 311401

收稿日期: 2023-07-10

  网络出版日期: 2023-09-15

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目“粮食丰产增效科技创新”(2016YFD0300104)

Effects of Irrigation Pattern and Nitrogen Application on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation of Northern Japonica Rice

Expand
  • 1College of Agriculture, Shenyang Agricultural University /Institute of Crop Physiology, Shenyang 110866, China
    2China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 311401, China
*zhouchan@syau.edu.cn

Received date: 2023-07-10

  Online published: 2023-09-15

摘要

为探讨灌溉模式与施氮方式对水稻产量及干物质积累的影响,以辽宁省主栽水稻品种沈稻47为试材开展田间试验。试验设淹水灌溉(W1)和干湿交替灌溉(W2)2种灌溉模式,施氮量为200 kg/hm2,根据不同时期施氮比例分为3种施氮方式:基肥∶分蘖肥∶穗肥=5∶3∶2(F1)、基肥∶分蘖肥∶穗肥=4∶5∶1(F2)、基肥∶分蘖肥∶穗肥=4∶3∶3(F3)。结果表明,W2模式比W1模式增产3.90%;2种灌溉模式下均以F3处理产量表现最佳,W2F3处理要比W1F3处理增产7.48%。增产的主要原因是增加了单位面积有效穗数、穗粒数和结实率。与W1模式相比,W2模式下的茎蘖成穗率、剑叶SPAD、LAI整体表现较高,尤其是在水稻生长后期。与W1F1(常规栽培管理)相比,W2F1和W2F3处理抽穗前干物质显著增加了14.24%和14.71%,各器官干物质量的积累也显著增加。相对于W1F1处理,W1F2和W2F1处理显著提高了叶片干物质输出率和转化率,W2F2和W2F3处理显著提高了茎鞘干物质输出率和转化率。研究结果为东北地区水稻高产合理灌溉和氮肥运筹提供了理论依据。

本文引用格式

王悦, 吴周周, 刘佳欣, 周婵婵, 王术, 贾宝艳, 黄元财, 王岩, 王韵, 冯跃 . 灌溉模式与施氮方式对北方粳稻产量及干物质积累的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023 , 29(5) : 71 -77 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.05.013

Abstract

To investigate the effects of irrigation patterns and N application methods on rice yield and dry matter accumulation, a field experiment was conducted using the main rice variety Shendao 47 in Liaoning Province as the test material. The experiment was conducted with two irrigation modes (W1, flood irrigation; W2, alternate wet and dry irrigation) and three nitrogen application methods [the N application rate is 200 kg/hm2, the proportions of basal fertilizer, tillering fertilizer and ear fertilizer are 5∶3∶2(F1), 4∶5∶1(F2) and 4∶3∶3(F3), respectively]. The results showed that the W2 mode increased yield by 3.90% compared to W1 mode. Under both W1 and W2 modes, F3 treatment had the best yield performance, W2F3 treatment increased yield by 7.48% compared to W1F3 treatment. The main reason for yield increase was the increase in effective panicles per unit area, grains per panicle and the kernel setting rate. Compared with the W1 mode, the overall performance of stem and tiller panicle rate, flag leaf SPAD and LAI was higher in the W2 mode, especially in the later stages of rice growth. Compared with W1F1 treatment, W2F1 and W2F3 treatments significantly increased pre-heading dry matter by 14.24% and 14.71%, respectively, and also significantly increased dry matter accumulation in all organs. Compared to W1F1 treatment, W1F2 and W2F1 treatments significantly increased leaf dry matter production and conversion rate, W2F2 and W2F3 treatments significantly increased culm sheath dry matter production and conversion rate. The results of the study provide a theoretical reference for rational irrigation and N fertilizer application for high yield of rice in Northeast China.

参考文献

[1] YU Q, CUI Y, HAN H, et al. Modelling water consumption and nitrogen loss in paddy fields with an improved ORYZA model[J]. Field Crops Research, 2023, 292(3): 1-12.
[2] YANG R, XU H. Water diversion and agricultural production: Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(4):1244-1 257.
[3] HOU D, WEI Y, LIU K, et al. The response of grain yield and quality of water-saving and drought-resistant rice to irrigation regimes[J]. Agriculture, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2023, 13(2): 302-314.
[4] YAO F X, HUANG J L, CUI K H, et al. Agronomic performance of high-yielding rice variety grown under alternate wetting and drying irrigation[J]. Field Crops Research, 2012, 126(2): 16-22.
[5] KATO Y, OKAMI M. Root morphology, hydraulic conductivity and plant water relations of high-yielding rice grown under aerobic conditions[J]. Annals of Botany, 2011, 108(3): 575-583.
[6] TAI Y P, Li Z A, MCBRIDE M B, et al. Dry cultivation enhances cadmium solubility in contaminated soils but minimizes cadmium accumulation in a leafy vegetable[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2017, 17(12): 2 822-2 830.
[7] STONE E C, HORNBERGER G M. Impacts of management alternatives on rice yield and nitrogen losses to the environment: A case study in rural Sri Lanka[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2016, 542(1): 271-276.
[8] CARRIJO D R, LUNDY M E, LINQUIST B A. Rice yields and water use under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: A meta-analysis[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017, 203(3):173-180.
[9] 潘晨, 杨宇, 漆栋良. 不同灌溉条件下氮肥配施模式对水稻干物质和产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(2):73-78.
[10] LIU L J, CHEN T, WANG Z, et al. Combination of site-specific nitrogen management and alternate wetting and drying irrigation increases grain yield and nitrogen and water use efficiency in super rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 154(12): 226-235.
[11] 王玉雯, 郭九信, 孔亚丽, 等. 氮肥优化管理协同实现水稻高产和氮肥高效[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(5):1157-1 166.
[12] 周婵婵, 黄元财, 贾宝艳, 等. 施氮量和灌溉方式的交互作用对东北粳稻稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(4):357-367.
[13] 曹小闯, 刘晓霞, 马超, 等. 干湿交替灌溉改善稻田根际氧环境进而促进氮素转化和水稻氮素吸收[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(1):1-14.
[14] WU W, NIE L X, LIAO Y C, et al. Toward yield improvement of early-season rice: Other options under double rice-cropping system in central China[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2013, 45(2): 75-86.
[15] PAL R, MAHAJAN G, SARDANA V, et al. Impact of sowing date on yield, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation, and nitrogen translocation in dry-seeded rice in North-West India[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017, 206(5): 138-148.
[16] WEI H Y, HU L, ZHU Y, et al. Different characteristics of nutrient absorption and utilization between inbred japonica super rice and inter-sub-specific hybrid super rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 218(4): 88-96.
[17] MAHAJAN G, CHAUHAN B S. Performance of dry direct-seeded rice in response to genotype and seeding rate[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2016, 108(1): 257-265.
[18] PENG S B, BURESH R J, HUANG J L, et al. Improving nitrogen fertilization in rice by site specific N management. A review[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2010, 30(3): 649-656.
[19] 张绍文, 何巧林, 王海月, 等. 控制灌溉条件下施氮量对杂交籼稻F优498氮素利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(1):82-94.
[20] 陈云, 刘昆, 李婷婷, 等. 结实期干湿交替灌溉对水稻根系、产量和土壤的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(3):269-277.
[21] SU Q, CANG B, ULLAH R, et al. Interaction of the coupled effects of irrigation mode and nitrogen fertilizer timing on rice yield in different regions[J]. Irrigation and Drainage, 2023, 20(3): 1-13.
[22] 吴龙龙, 虞轶俊, 田仓, 等. 干湿交替灌溉下施氮模式对水稻光合产物和氮转运的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(3):295-307.
[23] PENG S B, TANG Q Y, ZOU Y B. Current status and challenges of rice production in China[J]. Plant Production Science, 2008, 12(1): 3-8.
[24] 褚光, 徐冉, 陈松, 等. 干湿交替灌溉对籼粳杂交稻产量与水分利用效率的影响及其生理基础[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7):1499-1 511.
[25] YE Y S, LIANG X Q, CHEN Y X, et al. Alternate wetting and drying irrigation and controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer in late-season rice. Effects on dry matter accumulation, yield, water and nitrogen use[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 144(3): 212-224.
[26] ZHANG W Y, YU J X, XU Y J, et al. Alternate wetting and drying irrigation combined with the proportion of polymer-coated urea and conventional urea rates increases grain yield, water and nitrogen use efficiencies in rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2021, 268(7): 1-12.
[27] CHEN J, ZHU X C, XIE J, et al. Reducing nitrogen application with dense planting increases nitrogen use efficiency by maintaining root growth in a double-rice cropping system[J]. The Crop Journal, 2021, 9(4): 805-815.
[28] 史鸿儒, 张文忠, 解文孝, 等. 不同氮肥施用模式下北方粳型超级稻物质生产特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(11):1985-1 993.
[29] JABRAN K, RIAZ M, HUSSAIN M, et al. Water-saving technologies affect the grain characteristics and recovery of fine-grain rice cultivars in semi-arid environment[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24(8): 12 971-12 981.
[30] 马群, 杨雄, 李敏, 等. 不同氮肥群体最高生产力水稻品种的物质生产积累[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(20):4159-4 169.
[31] PAN J F, CUI K H, WEI D, et al. Relationships of non-structural carbohydrates accumulation and translocation with yield formation in rice recombinant inbred lines under two nitrogen levels[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2011, 141(4): 321-331.
[32] BAGHERIKIA S, PAHLEVANI M, YAMCHI A, et al. Transcript profiling of genes encoding fructan and sucrose metabolism in wheat under terminal drought stress[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2019, 38(6): 148-163.
[33] MORITA S, NAKANO H. Nonstructural carbohydrate content in the stem at full heading contributes to high performance of ripening in heat‐tolerant rice cultivar Nikomaru[J]. Crop Science, 2011, 51(2): 818-828.
[34] 邓飞, 王丽, 刘利, 等. 不同生态条件下栽培方式对水稻干物质生产和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(10):1930-1 942.
[35] ZHANG Z J, CHU G, LIU L J, et al. Mid-season nitrogen application strategies for rice varieties differing in panicle size[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 150(8): 9-18.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发