
再生稻头季施用促芽肥对不同节位腋芽生长发育和碳氮含量的影响
收稿日期: 2023-11-22
网络出版日期: 2024-05-20
基金资助
国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0301602);福建省科技计划对外合作项目(2018I0002)
Effects of the Application of Bud-promoting Fertilizers in the First Season of Ratooning Rice on the Growth and Development of Axillary Buds at Different Nodes and the Carbon and Nitrogen Content
Received date: 2023-11-22
Online published: 2024-05-20
为探究再生稻生产中促芽肥施用量对头季稻不同节位腋芽萌发及生长发育的影响,以杂交水稻品种泸优1831和甬优1540为供试材料,设置4个不同促芽肥施用量处理(N0,不施氮;N1,纯N 75.00 kg/hm2;N2,纯N 84.40 kg/hm2;N3,纯N 93.75 kg/hm2),测定了不同促芽肥施用量处理下再生稻头季不同节位腋芽存活率、芽长、茎节非结构碳水化合物含量和全氮含量。结果表明,腋芽存活率和芽长与促芽肥施用量成正比,施用促芽肥可以显著提高再生稻的腋芽存活率,N3处理较N0处理腋芽存活率提高27.34%(甬优1540)~36.51%(泸优1831)。不同节位腋芽对于促芽肥响应不同,N3处理下泸优1831第2、第3、第4节位的腋芽存活率较N0处理分别提高74.36%、29.35%和22.33%,甬优1540则分别提高24.25%、22.33%和40.49%;相同促芽肥施用量下高节位腋芽存活率均高于低节位腋芽;腋芽存活率与腋芽可溶性糖含量呈极显著正相关关系,第3、第4节位的腋芽存活率与腋芽中淀粉含量呈负相关关系。综上所述,不同节位腋芽存活率与腋芽中的可溶性糖含量有关,其中维持第4节位腋芽存活所需促芽肥最多,当选择低留桩机械化收割时可以适当减少促芽肥的施用量。
杨运城, 曾春丽, 姚飞飞, 孙彦波, 杨子鹏, 陈鸿飞 . 再生稻头季施用促芽肥对不同节位腋芽生长发育和碳氮含量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2024 , 30(3) : 32 -38 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2024.03.005
Hybrid rice varieties Luyou 1831 and Yongyou 1540 were used as test materials, and four different treatments of bud promoting fertilizer were set up (N0, no nitrogen application; N1, pure N 75.00 kg/hm2; N2, pure N 84.40 kg/hm2; N3, pure N 93.75 kg/hm2), in order to explore the effects of bud-promoting fertilizer application on the germination and growth of axillary buds at different nodes in the first season of ratooning rice. The survival rate of axillary buds at different node locations, bud length, non-structural carbohydrate content in stem nodes and total nitrogen content of stem nodes in the first season of ratooning rice were measured under different application rates of bud-promoting fertilizers. The results showed that the survival rate of axillary buds and bud length were positively correlated with the application rate of bud-promoting fertilizers. The application of bud-promoting fertilizers significantly increased the survival rate of axillary buds in regenerable rice, the N3 treatment increased the axillary bud survival rate by 27.34%(Yongyou 1540) and 36.51%(Luyou 1831) compared to the N0 treatment. Axillary buds at different nodes responded differently to germination-promoting fertilizers. In the N3 treatment, the survival rates of Luyou 1831 axillary buds at the second, third, and fourth nodes increased by 74.36%, 29.35% and 22.33% compared to the N0 treatment, respectively. The survival rates of Yongyou 1540 axillary buds at the second, third, and fourth nodes increased by 24.25%, 22.33% and 40.49% compared to the N0 treatment, respectively. The survival rate of axillary buds at higher nodes was higher than that at lower nodes under the same application rate of bud-promoting fertilizers. The survival rate of axillary buds was positively correlated with the soluble sugar content in the buds, and negatively correlated with the starch content in the axillary buds at the third and fourth nodes. In conclusion, the survival rate of axillary buds at different nodes is related to the soluble sugar content in the buds, with the highest requirement for bud-promoting fertilizers needed to maintain the survival of axillary buds at the fourth node. When choosing to harvest with low stubble, the application rate of bud-promoting fertilizers can be reduced appropriately.
| [1] | 林强, 蔡秋华, 崔丽丽, 等. 强再生力水稻品种筛选与选育研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(5):1-6. |
| [2] | 陈鸿飞, 梁义元, 林瑞余, 等. 不同栽培模式早稻-再生稻头季稻分蘖动态及生理生化特性研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(2):373-379. |
| [3] | YU X, YUAN S, TAO X, et al. Comparisons between main and ratoon crops in resource use efficiencies, environmental impacts, and economic profits of rice ratooning system in central China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 799: 149 246. |
| [4] | 杨德生, 黄见良, 彭少兵. 机收再生稻高产优质栽培技术研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(5):1-8. |
| [5] | 蔡秋华, 林强, 朱永生, 等. 再生稻高产高效生产技术研究进展[J]. 科技促进发展, 2021, 17(10):1 843-1 850. |
| [6] | YU X, TAO X, LIAO J, et al. Predicting potential cultivation region and paddy area for ratoon rice production in China using Maxent model[J]. Field Crops Research, 2022, 275: 108 372. |
| [7] | 曹玉贤, 朱建强, 侯俊. 中国再生稻的产量差及影响因素[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(4):707-724. |
| [8] | 孙晓辉. 中国的再生稻研究(综述)[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 1995, 13(4):506-517. |
| [9] | 熊洪, 冉茂林, 徐富贤, 等. 南方稻区再生稻研究进展及发展[J]. 作物学报, 2000, 26(3):297-304. |
| [10] | 林文雄, 陈鸿飞, 张志兴, 等. 再生稻产量形成的生理生态特性与关键栽培技术的研究与展望[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(4):392-401. |
| [11] | 徐富贤, 熊洪, 张林, 等. 再生稻产量形成特点与关键调控技术研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(9):1 702-1 717. |
| [12] | 陈鸿飞, 张志兴, 林文雄. 促芽肥对水稻再生芽萌发生长过程蛋白质表达的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2014(12):1 405-1 413. |
| [13] | 吴龙龙, 虞轶俊, 田仓, 等. 干湿交替灌溉下施氮模式对水稻光合产物和氮转运的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(3):295-307. |
| [14] | 王勃然, 梁利琴, 向金彪, 等. 双季稻区再生稻种植模式对氮磷吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022. |
| [15] | 丁卫东, 罗瑾. 隆回县再生稻品种筛选及分析[J]. 作物研究, 2009, 23(2):89-91. |
| [16] | 段门俊, 吴芸紫, 田玉聪, 等. 不同品种再生稻产量及品质比较研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018(2):61-67. |
| [17] | 汪浩, 张强, 张文地, 等. 腋芽萌发能力对再生稻产量影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(3):205-216. |
| [18] | 刘杨, 王强盛, 丁艳锋, 等. 氮素和6-BA对水稻分蘖芽发育的影响及其生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(10):1 893-1 899. |
| [19] | 张国, 崔克辉. 水稻茎鞘非结构性碳水化合物积累与转运研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(6):1 127-1 136. |
| [20] | 程建峰, 潘晓云, 曾晓春, 等. 水稻再生特性的生理基础研究Ⅱ. 头季收获时可溶性糖含量的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2001, 23(2):167-170. |
| [21] | HE A B, WANG W Q, JIANG G L, et al. Source-sink regulation and its effects on the regeneration ability of ratoon rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2019, 236: 155-164. |
| [22] | 王敏羽, 戴志刚, 余德芳, 等. “水稻-再生稻”种植模式专用肥轻简施用对产量、肥料利用率及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(5):531-542. |
| [23] | 李姗, 傅向东. 调控植物生长代谢平衡实现可持续发展农业[J]. 生命的化学, 2019, 39(5):943-949. |
| [24] | 凌启鸿, 苏祖芳, 侯康平, 等. 水稻潜伏芽生长和穗分化形成规律及其应用的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 1989, 22(1):35-43. |
| [25] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 等. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4):405-414. |
| [26] | 习敏, 凃德宝, 周永进, 等. 早熟籼稻低留桩机收再生丰产优质增效栽培技术[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(5):93-95. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |