专论与研究

Sentinel-2遥感影像在盘锦水稻米质监测中的应用研究

展开
  • 1沈阳建筑大学 交通与测绘工程学院,沈阳 110168
    2中国气象局 沈阳大气环境研究所,沈阳 110166
    3盘锦市大洼区气象局,辽宁 盘锦 124200
    4黑龙江省农业科学院 大庆分院,黑龙江 大庆 163319

收稿日期: 2023-12-18

  网络出版日期: 2024-11-19

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(42275202);辽宁省教育厅项目(lnjc02015);中国气象局沈阳大气环境研究所结余资金项目(2022SYIAEJY5)

Application of Sentinel-2 Remote Sensing Image in Rice Quality Monitoring in Panjin City

Expand
  • 1School of Transportation and Geomatics Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China
    2Institute of Atmospheric Environment, China Meteorological Administration, Shenyang 110166, China
    3Panjin Dawa Meteorological Bureau, Panjin 124200, China
    4Daqing Branch, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163319, China

Received date: 2023-12-18

  Online published: 2024-11-19

摘要

本研究基于水稻孕穗期、抽穗期、灌浆期和成熟期4个生育期的Sentinel-2遥感数据,分析各生育期内卫星遥感光谱参数与稻米品质指标的关系,建立基于各生育期卫星光谱信息的水稻品质指标预测模型。将5种稻米品质指标分别与4个生育期内的光谱参数进行皮尔逊相关性分析,结果表明,5项品质指标在4个生育期内均与光谱参数有不同程度相关性。然后筛选出相关性效果显著的光谱参数,用于建立各品质指标的预测方程,建模结果表明,基于卫星遥感光谱信息解释率由大到小的稻米品质指标依次是精米率>长宽比>蛋白质含量>直链淀粉含量>糙米率;卫星遥感光谱反演稻米各品质指标所在的最佳生育期不同,糙米率和精米率的最佳生育期为抽穗期,其建模决定系数(Coefficient of Determination,R2)分别为0.461和0.893;长宽比的最佳生育期为成熟期,R2为0.878;直链淀粉含量和蛋白质含量的最佳生育期为灌浆期,R2分别为0.646和0.647;基于卫星遥感光谱信息的稻米品质模型验证效果较好,解释率为51%~74%。可见,利用卫星遥感技术能够实现大范围水稻品质指标定量监测与评估。

本文引用格式

王岩, 高美琦, 李荣平, 赵先丽, 张美玲, 卞景阳 . Sentinel-2遥感影像在盘锦水稻米质监测中的应用研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2024 , 30(6) : 74 -81 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2024.06.012

Abstract

Based on Sentinel-2 remote sensing data of rice at booting stage, heading stage, filling stage and mature stage, this study analyzed the relationship between satellite remote sensing spectral parameters and rice quality indicators in each growth period, and established a prediction model of rice quality indicators based on satellite spectral information in each growth period, carried out pearson correlation between five different quality indexes of rice grains and spectral parameters in four growth stages. The results showed that, the five quality indicators had significant correlation with spectral parameters in different degrees during the four growth stages. Then, the spectral parameters with significant correlation effect were selected to establish the prediction equation of rice quality indicator, the modeling results showed that: (1) Based on the interpretation rate of satellite remote sensing spectral information, the rice quality indicators from large to small are: milled rice rate>length-width ratio>protein content>amylose content>brown rice rate. (2) The best growth period of rice quality indicator inverted by satellite remote sensing spectrum was different. The best growth period of brown rice rate and milled rice rate was heading stage, and the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.461 and 0.893, respectively. The best growth period of length-width ratio was mature period, and R2 was 0.878. The best growth period of amylose content and protein content was filling stage, and R2 was 0.646 and 0.647, respectively. (3) The rice quality model based on satellite remote sensing spectral information had a good verification effect, and the interpretation rate was 51%-74%. Therefore, the use of satellite remote sensing technology can realize the quantitative monitoring and evaluation of rice quality indicators in a wide range.

参考文献

[1] 徐春春, 纪龙, 陈中督, 等. 2022年我国水稻产业发展分析及2023年展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(2):1-4.
[2] 张强, 张戈丽, 朱道林, 等. 1980—2018年中国水稻生产变化的时空格局[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(4):687-700.
[3] 朱德峰, 张玉屏, 陈惠哲, 等. 中国水稻栽培技术发展与展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(4):45-49.
[4] 解文欢. 基于Sentinel-2影像的水稻种植面积提取研究[J]. 现代化农业, 2023(6):37-39.
[5] 刘剑, 王冬至. 基于SAR影像的广东省垦造水田监测应用研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2021(12):79-82.
[6] BADRI B B, APAN A A, KELLY R M, et al. Relating satellite imagery with grain protein content[J]. Proceedings of the Spatial Science Conference, 2003, 9: 22-27.
[7] PETTERSON C G, ECKERSTEN H. Prediction of grain protein in spring malting barley growth in Northern Europe[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2007, 27(2): 205-214.
[8] WRIGHT D L, RASMUSSEN V P, RAMSEY R D, et al. Canopy reflectance estimation of wheat nitrogen content for grain protein management[J]. GIScience and Remote Sensing, 2004, 41(4): 287-300.
[9] WAKAMORI K, ICHIKAWA D, OGURI N. Estimation of rice growth status,protein content and yield prediction using multi-satellite data[C]// Japan: International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2017.
[10] CHANSEOK R, MASAHIKO S, MICHIHISA I, et al. Integrating remote sensing and GIS for prediction of rice protein contents[J]. Precision Agriculture, 2011, 12(3): 378-394.
[11] ZHANG J, SONG X, JING X, et al. Remote sensing monitoring of rice grain potein content based on a multidimensional euclidean distance method[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14: 3 989.
[12] 王大成, 张东彦, 李宇飞, 等. 结合HJ1A/B卫星数据和生态因子的籽粒品质监测[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2013, 42(3):780-786.
[13] 谭昌伟, 王纪华, 黄文江, 等. 基于TM和PLS的冬小麦籽粒蛋白质含量预测[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(3):388-392.
[14] 李卫国, 王纪华, 赵春江, 等. 基于NDVI和氮素积累的冬小麦籽粒蛋白质含量预测模型[J]. 遥感学报, 2008, 12(3):506-511.
[15] 丁锦峰, 朱新开, 王君婵, 等. 基于开花期卫星影像的春性中、弱筋小麦籽粒蛋白质含量遥感预测[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2015, 30(6):932-940.
[16] YAN Y, ZHANG X, LI D, et al. Laboratory shortwave infrared reflectance spectroscopy for estimating grain protein content in rice and wheat[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2021, 42(12): 4 463-4 488.
[17] 张骁, 闫岩, 王文辉, 等. 基于小波分析的水稻籽粒直链淀粉含量高光谱预测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8):1563-1 580.
[18] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. GB 5009.3—2016,食品安全国家标准·食品中水分的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
[19] 易俐娜, 张桂峰, 魏征, 等. 利用无人机高光谱影像的红树林群落物种分类[J]. 测绘通报, 2022(11):26-31.
[20] 颜士博. 基于高分数据的水稻品质监测方法的研究[D]. 杭州: 杭州师范大学, 2017.
[21] 傅兆鹏. 基于无人机多光谱影像的小麦产量与蛋白质含量预测模型研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2020.
[22] 田荣才, 高志强, 卢俊玮. 基于冠层光谱的早籼稻籽粒蛋白质含量估测[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(4):188-194.
[23] 谢莉莉. 水稻品质多平台高光谱遥感估测方法研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2021.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发