
不同栽培技术与品种对华南籼稻产量、肥料利用率和间接碳足迹的影响
第一作者:nx121261020@163.com
收稿日期: 2024-03-05
网络出版日期: 2025-01-13
基金资助
广州市科技计划项目(202201011834);广州市科技计划项目(202206010069);广东省科技计划项目(2021B1212050020)
Effects of Different Cultivation Techniques and Varieties on Grain Yield, Fertilizer Utilization and Indirect Carbon Footprint of Indica Rice in South China
1st author: nx121261020@163.com
Received date: 2024-03-05
Online published: 2025-01-13
黄南巡, 张敏强, 叶清生, 张琮焜, 李健雄, 王昕钰, 傅友强, 梁开明 . 不同栽培技术与品种对华南籼稻产量、肥料利用率和间接碳足迹的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2025 , 31(1) : 18 -26 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.01.003
Collaboration towards achieving high yields and carbon reduction in rice production is crucial for ensuring national food self-sufficiency and attaining the goals of carbon peak and carbon neutrality. To quantitatively analyze the carbon footprint (CF) and composition characteristics of rice production in South China, multiple site field experiments were conducted in four representative rice-producing areas in Guangdong Province. The life cycle assessment method was employed to examine variations in rice yield, fertilizer utilization rate, indirect CF (CFindirect), and its composition under different planting techniques. The results revealed that CFindirect per unit area of indica rice production ranged from 1 235.3-1 487.7 kg CO2-eq/hm2, while CFindirect per unit yield varied between 0.12-0.31 kg CO2-eq/kg yield. The cultivation technique significantly influenced yield, fertilizer utilization efficiency, irrigation frequency, and CFindirect per unit yield in rice production. Compared with the farmers conventional cultivation techniques (FP), the low-carbon and high-yielding cultivation technique (LC) significantly reduced the N fertilizer input and increased the grain yields. No significant interaction was found between the factors of cultivation techniques and rice varieties. The CFindirect per unit yield was found to be significantly and negatively correlated with the yield under the same cultivation techniques, suggesting that adopting high-yielding varieties effectively mitigated CFindirect per unit yield under the same cultivation technique. Multi-site demonstration experiments showed that LC technique increased rice grain yield by 3.67%-21.62% and improved the partial productivity of N fertilizer by 21.68%-60.81%, compared with FP. The implementation of LC technique led to an average reduction of irrigation frequency by 4 times during each cropping season. The CFindirect per unit area and CFindirect per unit yield in LC was decreased by 6.11% and 16.19%, respectively, compared with FP. N fertilizer and diesel were the primary factors influencing CFindirect in rice production. Carbon emissions from diesel accounted for 49.65%-52.88% of the total CFindirect, while emissions from N fertilizer contributed to 30.62%-34.70%. On average, reducing N fertilizer by 1 kg led to a reduction of CFindirect by 2.49 kg CO2-eq/hm2. The indirect carbon footprint per unit yield was significantly and negatively correlated with fertilizer N partial productivity, indicating that the CFindirect per unit yield could be effectively reduced by increasing yield and fertilizer N efficiency. In conclusion, the adoption of high-yield rice varieties in conjunction with optimized cultivation techniques effectively enhanced grain yield and fertilizer N efficiency, while simultaneously reduced both the CFindirect per unit area and CFindirect per unit yield. This ultimately achieved a synergistic balance between high yielding and low carbon emissions in rice production at South China.
| [1] | 秦晓波, 王金明, 王斌, 等. 稻田甲烷排放现状、减排技术和低碳生产战略路径[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2023, 19(5):541-558. |
| [2] | 中华人民共和国气候变化第二次两年更新报告[R/OL]. [2022-10-10]. |
| [3] | 任孝俭, 彭雨瑄, 韩凯艳, 等. 水稻植株对稻田甲烷排放的影响及其生物学机理研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(36):80-87. |
| [4] | 闫晓君, 王丽丽, 江瑜, 等. 长江三角洲主要超级稻CH4排放特征及其与植株生长特性的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(9):2 518-2 524. |
| [5] | 江瑜, 管大海, 张卫建. 水稻植株特性对稻田甲烷排放的影响及其机制的研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(2):175-181. |
| [6] | DAS K, BARUAH K K. Methane emission associated with anatomical and morphophysiological characteristics of rice (Oryza sativa) plant[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2008, 134(2): 303-312. |
| [7] | GAO B, JU X T, ZHANG Q, et al. New estimates of direct N2O emissions from Chinese croplands from 1980 to 2007 using localized emission factors[J]. Biogeosciences, 2011, 8(10): 3 011-3 024. |
| [8] | 国家统计局. 2023中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2024. |
| [9] | 钟旭华, 梁开明, 潘俊峰, 等. 华南双季稻低碳高产栽培技术研究进展[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2023, 44(6):867-874. |
| [10] | 童庆蒙, 沈雪, 张露, 等. 基于生命周期评价法的碳足迹核算体系:国际标准与实践[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(1):46-57. |
| [11] | 耿涌, 董会娟, 郗凤明, 等. 应对气候变化的碳足迹研究综述[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(10):6-12. |
| [12] | International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO/TS14067: 2013 Greenhouse gases-carbon footprint of products-requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication[S]. Switzerland, Geneva:2013. |
| [13] | 张志伟, 秦晓波, 樊建凌, 等. 干湿交替灌溉模式在湖南稻区适用性及其甲烷减排潜力评估[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(suppl1):232-239. |
| [14] | 王金明, 秦晓波, 万运帆, 等. 中国水稻食物系统碳足迹结构组成和地区差异[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(8):1 405-1 418. |
| [15] | SHABIR I, DASH K K, DAR A H, et al. Carbon footprints evaluation for sustainable food processing system development: A comprehensive review[J]. Future Foods, 2023, 7: 100 215. |
| [16] | CHENG K, PAN G, SMITH P, et al. Carbon footprint of China's crop production—An estimation using agro-statistics data over 1993—2007[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2011, 142(3-4): 231-237. |
| [17] | 黄晓敏, 陈长青, 陈铭洲, 等. 2004—2013年东北三省主要粮食作物生产碳足迹[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(10): 3 307-3 315. |
| [18] | 王兴来, 苗淑杰, 乔云发. 基于江苏省本地化参数评价稻麦周年轮作系统碳足迹[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(9):1 682-1 691. |
| [19] | 张卫建, 陈长青, 江瑜, 等. 气候变暖对我国水稻生产的综合影响及其应对策略[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(4):805-811. |
| [20] | 陈松文, 刘天奇, 曹凑贵, 等. 水稻生产碳中和现状及低碳稻作技术策略[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2021, 40(3):3-12. |
| [21] | 唐志伟, 张俊, 邓艾兴, 等. 我国稻田甲烷排放的时空特征与减排途径[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(4):582-591. |
| [22] | LIANG K M, ZHONG X H, FU Y Q, et al. Mitigation of environmental N pollution and greenhouse gas emission from double rice cropping system with a new alternate wetting and drying irrigation regime coupled with optimized N fertilization in South China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2023, 282: 108 282. |
| [23] | 王兴, 赵鑫, 王钰乔, 等. 中国水稻生产的碳足迹分析[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(4):713-722. |
| [24] | CHENG H M, SHU K X, ZHU T Y, et al. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on yield, water and nitrogen use, and greenhouse gas emissions in rice paddy fields[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 349: 131 487. |
| [25] | SRIPHIROM P, ROSSOPA B. Assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation from rice cultivation using alternate wetting and drying and rice straw biochar in Thailand[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2023, 290: 108 586. |
| [26] | YANG S, XIAO Y N, SUN X, et al. Biochar improved rice yield and mitigated CH4 and N2O emissions from paddy field under controlled irrigation in the Taihu Lake Region of China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2019, 200: 69-77. |
| [27] | 朱士江. 寒地稻作不同灌溉模式的节水及温室气体排放效应试验研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2012. |
| [28] | 张忠明, 王忠波, 张忠学, 等. 不同灌溉模式对寒地水稻田碳排放、耗水量及产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(11):1-7. |
| [29] | LIANG K M, ZHONG X H, HUANG N N, et al. Nitrogen losses and greenhouse gas emissions under different N and water management in a subtropical double-season rice cropping system[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2017, 609: 46-57. |
| [30] | LI J L, LI Y E, WAN Y F, et al. Annual greenhouse gas emissions from a rice paddy with different water-nitrogen management strategies in Central China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2024, 235: 105 906. |
| [31] | LIANG K M, ZHONG X H, HUANG N N, et al. Grain yield, water productivity and CH4 emission of irrigated rice in response to water management in South China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, 163: 319-331. |
| [32] | 张丹, 张卫峰. 低碳农业与农作物碳足迹核算研究述评[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(7):1 395-1 405. |
| [33] | 陈中督, 徐春春, 纪龙, 等. 基于农户调查的长江流域双季稻生产碳、氮足迹分析——以江西和湖南为例[J]. 作物杂志, 2023(2):229-237. |
| [34] | 张惠云, 秦丽杰, 贾利. 吉林省水稻生产的碳足迹与水足迹时空变化特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(6):974-983. |
| [35] | 谢婷, 张慧, 苗洁, 等. 湖北省农田生态系统温室气体排放特征与源/汇分析[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(5):839-848. |
| [36] | 曹黎明, 李茂柏, 王新其, 等. 基于生命周期评价的上海市水稻生产的碳足迹[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(2):491-499. |
| [37] | 张传红, 韩露, 谢佳男, 等. 江苏省主要农作物碳足迹动态及其构成研究[J]. 南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 14(1):110-119. |
| [38] | 王毅勇, 于冰, 田有, 等. 三江平原水稻生产的碳足迹评价[J]. 土壤与作物, 2023, 12(1):10-17. |
| [39] | YAN M, CHENG K, LUO T, et al. Carbon footprint of grain crop production in China-based on farm survey data[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 104: 130-138. |
| [40] | 颜晓元, 夏龙龙, 遆超普. 面向作物产量和环境双赢的氮肥施用策略[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(2):177-183. |
| [41] | HUANG Y, TANG Y H. An estimate of greenhouse gas (N2O and CO2) mitigation potential under various scenarios of nitrogen use efficiency in Chinese croplands[J]. Global Change Biology, 2010, 16(11): 2 958-2 970. |
| [42] | LIANG K M, ZHONG X H, PAN J F, et al. Reducing nitrogen surplus and environmental losses by optimized nitrogen and water management in double rice cropping system of South China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2019, 286: 106 680. |
| [43] | 陈中督, 徐春春, 纪龙, 等. 2004—2014年南方稻区双季稻生产碳足迹动态及其构成[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(11):3 669-3 676. |
| [44] | 张卫建, 张艺, 邓艾兴, 等. 我国水稻品种更新与稻作技术改进对碳排放的综合影响及趋势分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(4):53-57. |
| [45] | 肖志祥, 傅志强, 徐华勤, 等. 双季稻品种根际特征与甲烷排放差异及其关系[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(2):904-914. |
| [46] | 周文涛, 戈家敏, 王勃然, 等. 不同水稻品种甲烷排放与土壤酶的关系[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(11):2 675-2 682. |
| [47] | 刘莉, 傅志强, 王义, 等. 早晚稻不同品种甲烷排放的差异与根系特性的相关分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(3):469-477. |
| [48] | 李思宇. 稻田温室气体排放水稻品种间差异及其机理研究[D], 扬州: 扬州大学, 2020. |
| [49] | 江瑜, 朱相成, 钱浩宇, 等. 水稻丰产与稻田甲烷减排协同的研究展望[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2022, 45(5):839-847. |
| [50] | 黄农荣, 梁开明, 钟旭华, 等. 南方低甲烷排放的高产水稻品种筛选与评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(12):2 854-2 863. |
| [51] | 曹凑贵, 李成芳, 展茗, 等. 稻田管理措施对土壤碳排放的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(1):93-98. |
| [52] | 杭晓宁. 稻作方式和秸秆还田对稻麦产量和温室气体排放的影响研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2015. |
| [53] | 郝小雨, 王晓军, 高洪生, 等. 松嫩平原不同秸秆还田方式下农田温室气体排放及碳足迹估算[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(2):318-325. |
| [54] | 逯非, 王效科, 韩冰, 等. 稻田秸秆还田:土壤固碳与甲烷增排[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(1):99-108. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |