
新疆粳稻耐盐相关性状的主成分分析及综合评价
收稿日期: 2024-02-26
网络出版日期: 2025-01-13
基金资助
水稻优异资源鉴定评价与优质高产水稻品种选育创新团队(2023D14017)
Principal Component Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance Related Traits in Japonica Rice in Xinjiang
Received date: 2024-02-26
Online published: 2025-01-13
康民泰, 杜孝敬, 张燕红, 文孝荣, 唐福森, 赵志强, 袁杰, 王奉斌 . 新疆粳稻耐盐相关性状的主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 中国稻米, 2025 , 31(1) : 79 -83 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.01.011
To establish a comprehensive evaluation index system for salt tolerance of japonica rice in northwest China and screen salt tolerant rice varieties suitable for planting in the saline-alkali areas of Xinjiang, 10 phenotypic indicators of 18 japonica rice materials in Xinjiang were determined using 0.5% salt stress treatment. In the evaluation process, we used the salt tolerance coefficient of each individual indicator as the main evaluation index, and comprehensively applied various statistical methods such as correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and cluster analysis to fully assess the salt tolerance of these materials. The results showed that under the salt stress conditions, there was a significant correlation among the weight per panicle, leaf area, the number of full grains and the number of total grains. The 10 indexes under salt stress were transformed into 4 independent principal components by principal component analysis, and the cumulative contribution of 4 principal components reached 76.19%. According to the comprehensive evaluation value D of the tested materials, the 18 materials were classified into three types: non salt resistant materials, accounting for 11.11%; medium salt resistant materials, accounting for 61.11%; salt resistant materials, accounting for 27.78%, including SD-12, SD-17, SD-16, SD-13 and SD-15.
| [1] | DAGAR C J, YADAV P K, SHARMA P C. Research Developments in Saline Agriculture[M]. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. |
| [2] | YONG H Y, WANG C L, BANCROFT I, et al. Identification of a gene controlling variation in the salt tolerance of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)[J]. Planta, 2015, 242: 313-326. |
| [3] | RUAN C J, DA SILVA J A T, MOPPER S, et al. Halophyte improvement for a salinized world[J]. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 2012, 29: 329-359. |
| [4] | MUNNS R, TESTER M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance[J]. Plant Biology, 2008, 59: 651-681. |
| [5] | 孟祥浩, 林琪, 张玉梅, 等. 盐胁迫对小麦萌发的影响及耐盐指标的筛选[J]. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(4):175-180. |
| [6] | 李明, 张俊华. 不同施肥模式对盐碱化稻作土壤细菌群落的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(5):142-148 |
| [7] | 路晓筠, 项卫东, 郑光耀, 等. 盐碱地改良措施研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(12):5-8. |
| [8] | 朱建峰, 崔振荣, 吴春红, 等. 我国盐碱地绿化研究进展与展望[J]. 世界林业研究, 2018, 31(4):70-75. |
| [9] | 钟克焱, 顾骁, 马启林, 等. 盐胁迫下耐盐番茄根的蛋白质组分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 44(5):495-499. |
| [10] | 新疆维吾尔自治区农业厅. 新疆土壤[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,1996:304-336. |
| [11] | YEO A R, FLOWERS T J. Salinity resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and a pyramiding approach to breeding varieties for saline soils[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 1986, 13(1): 161-173. |
| [12] | 孙现军, 姜奇彦, 胡正, 等. 水稻资源全生育期耐盐性鉴定筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(11):1656-1 663. |
| [13] | 李红宇, 李逸, 司洋, 等. 北方粳稻耐盐碱相关性状主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(8):1862-1871. |
| [14] | 王才林, 张亚东, 赵凌, 等. 耐盐碱水稻研究现状、问题与建议[J]. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(1):1-6 |
| [15] | 刘梦霜, 郭海峰, 陈观秀. 不同水稻品种对NaCl胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2023, 44(2):326-336 |
| [16] | 郑崇珂, 张治振, 周冠华, 等. 不同水稻品种发芽期耐盐性评价[J]. 山东农业科学, 2018, 50(10):38-42. |
| [17] | 程保山, 袁彩勇, 罗伯祥, 等. 水稻耐盐性的遗传及育种研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2016, 22(17):45-48. |
| [18] | 彭江涛, 侯新坡, 兰涛, 等. 水稻苗期耐盐性基因 SST 分子标记的筛选与应用[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 46(2):166-171. |
| [19] | 潘世驹, 李红宇, 姜玉伟, 等. 寒地水稻幼苗期耐盐资源筛选[J]. 南方农业科学, 2015, 46(10):1 775-1 779. |
| [20] | 田蕾, 陈亚萍, 刘俊, 等. 粳稻种质资源芽期耐盐性综合评价与筛选[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(6): 631-642. |
| [21] | 贺奇, 王昕, 殷延勃, 等. 盐胁迫下粳稻种子发芽特性及耐盐性评价[J]. 中国稻米, 2018, 24(1):28-32. |
| [22] | 魏征, 邹燕, 屠乃美. 不同类型水稻芽期的耐盐性差异[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 47(3):254-261. |
| [23] | 周毅, 崔丰磊, 杨萍, 等. 水稻不同品种幼苗期耐盐性评价[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2015, 37(5):781-787. |
| [24] | 刘艳, 王宝祥, 邢运高, 等. 水稻品种资源苗期耐盐性评价指标分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(17):75-79. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |