专论与研究

中国水稻品种鉴定标准SSR标记的基因组特征研究

展开
  • 1浙江大学 现代种业研究所/水稻生物育种全国重点实验室,杭州 310058
    2哈尔滨市农业科学院,哈尔滨 150029
    3浙江大学 新农村发展研究院,杭州 310058
    4浙江大学 海南研究院,海南 三亚 572024
    5黑龙江大学 现代农业与生态环境学院,哈尔滨 150080
第一联系人:

第一作者:yuxinhe@zju.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2024-07-02

  网络出版日期: 2025-03-12

基金资助

哈尔滨市科技项目(GJ2021TZ002007);海南省自然科学基金高层次人才项目(322RC741)

Study on the Genomic Characteristics of SSR Markers Used for Rice Variety Differentiation in China

Expand
  • 1The Advanced Seed Institute, Zhejiang University/State Key Laboratory of Rice Breeding & Biology, Hangzhou 310058, China
    2Harbin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150029, China
    3The New Countryside Development Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    4Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya, Hainan 572024, China
    5College of Modern Agriculture and Ecological Environment, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China
First author contact:

1st author: yuxinhe@zju.edu.cn

Received date: 2024-07-02

  Online published: 2025-03-12

摘要

在我国各级水稻新品种区域试验和审定流程中,主要依据《水稻品种鉴定技术规程 SSR标记法》判别参试品种在试验周期内的一致性及其与已审定品种的差异性。鉴于SSR(简单重复序列)标记开发初期,水稻基因组学研究尚处于起步阶段,这些标记主要基于有限品种的SSR多态性分析结果来确定,因此对于采用该48个SSR作为品种区分依据的有效性和科学性,实际上缺乏足够的认识。本研究通过引物序列比对分析,精确定位了这48个SSR标记在水稻基因组中的具体位置,旨在探讨这些SSR标记在水稻基因组上的分布特征,并评估其变异可能引发的生物学效应。我们利用SSR标记引物对公共基因组组装数据进行扩增,并分析扩增序列标记,测定了这些标记在籼、粳亚种群体中的多态性。结果表明,这48个标记在水稻的12条染色体上呈不均匀分布。其中,35个标记位于基因内部或上下游2.0 kb内,3个标记位于基因的外显子区,但SSR重复单元的增减并未导致移码突变的发生。在分析的193份亚洲代表性栽培稻品种中,有3个标记在粳稻群体(58个品种)中未表现出多态性,多态性信息含量(PIC)为0,另有8个标记在粳稻群体中的多态性低(PIC<0.25);同样,在籼稻群体(135个品种)中,也有5个标记多态性低(PIC<0.25)。此外,在扩增区段内,除重复单元外,还观察到了单核苷酸变异以及插入、缺失变异。本研究不仅揭示了这48个SSR标记的基因组学特征,还明确指出,在代表性群体中,少数SSR标记仍缺乏足够的品种鉴别能力,同时,我们还发现了SSR标记内部重复序列外的核苷酸变异,这为优化现有SSR标记开发新的水稻品种鉴定SSR标记,以及科学认识现有SSR标记在品种鉴别中的局限性提供了重要方向和启示。

本文引用格式

何雨欣, 于清涛, 谭瑗瑗, 舒庆尧, 刘乃新, 刘振 . 中国水稻品种鉴定标准SSR标记的基因组特征研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2025 , 31(2) : 6 -12 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.02.002

Abstract

In the process of regional test and approval of new rice varieties at all levels in China, the consistency of the varieties over testing years and the differences between testing varieties and already approved varieties are mainly judged according to the “Protocol for identification of rice varieties-SSR marker method”. Since the study of rice genome was still in its infancy, the development of these SSR markers was mainly determined based on the results of polymorphism analysis of limited rice varieties, hence there is a lack of sufficient understanding of the 48 SSR markers in terms of their validity and scientific soundness as the basis for distinguishing varieties.This study pinpointed the specific locations of these 48 SSR markers in the rice genome through primer sequence alignment analysis, aiming to explore the distribution patterns of these SSR markers on the rice genome and assess the potential biological effects of their variations. We amplified the public genome assembly data using SSR marker primers and determined the polymorphism of these markers in the indica and japonica rice subspecies groups by analyzing the amplified sequences. The results showed that these 48 markers were unevenly distributed across the 12 chromosomes of rice. Of these, 35 markers were located within genes or within 2.0 kb upstream or downstream of genes, and 3 markers were directly located in the exon regions of genes. However, it is noteworthy that the increase or decrease in SSR repeat units did not lead to frameshift mutations. Among the 193 Asian representative cultivated rice varieties analyzed, 3 markers showed no polymorphism in the japonica group (including 58 varieties), with a polymorphism information content (PIC) of 0; another 8 markers had very low polymorphism in the japonica group (PIC<0.25). Similarly, in the indica group (including 135 varieties), 5 markers also had very low polymorphism (PIC<0.25). In addition to repeat units, single nucleotide variations, as well as insertions and deletions, were observed within the amplified segments. This study not only revealed the genomic characteristics of these 48 SSR markers but also clearly pointed out that a few SSR markers still lack sufficient variety identification capability in representative populations. At the same time, we discovered nucleotide variations beyond the internal repeat sequences of SSR markers, which provides important directions and insights for optimizing existing SSR markers, developing new SSR markers for rice variety identification, and scientifically understanding the limitations of existing SSR markers in variety differentiation.

参考文献

[1] 袁力行, 傅骏骅, WARBURTON M, 等. 利用 RFLP、SSR、AFLP和 RAPD标记分析玉米自交系遗传多样性的比较研究[J]. 遗传学报, 2000, 27(8):725-733.
[2] 匡猛, 杨伟华, 许红霞, 等. 分子标记技术在棉花品种鉴定上的研究进展[J]. 棉花学报, 2009, 21(4):330-334.
[3] 朱岩芳. 作物品种分子标记鉴定及指纹图谱构建研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2013.
[4] 朱振东, 贾继增. 小麦SSR标记的发展及应用[J]. 遗传, 2003, 25(3):355-360.
[5] 罗冉, 吴委林, 张旸. SSR分子标记在作物遗传育种中的应用[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2010, 29 (1):137-143.
[6] BESER N, MUTAFCILAR C, HASANCEBI S. Diversity analysis of the rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.) by utilizing SSRs rice diversity by SSRs[J]. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 2021, 45(2): e15232.
[7] 中国水稻研究所, 农业部科技发展中心, 农业部稻米及制品质量监督检验测试中心. NY/T 1433-2007. 水稻品种鉴定DNA指纹法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[8] 中国水稻研究所, 农业部科技发展中心. NY/T 1433-2014. 水稻品种鉴定技术规程SSR标记法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.
[9] 马菊, 赵锦祥, 林郑希, 等. 利用SSR标记对水稻7组衍生品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 49(3):289-294.
[10] 左示敏, 周娜娜, 陈宗祥, 等. SSR标记在江苏粳稻品种鉴定中的应用研究[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2014, 35(4):46-51.
[11] 林亦霞, 王梓辛, 刘欢, 等. 基于NYT 1433—2014中48对SSR引物的94份杂交稻亲本DNA分子数字指纹库研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(6):593-602.
[12] PANAUD O, CHEN X L, MCCOUCH S R. Frequency of microsatelite sequences in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Genome, 1996, 38(6): 1 170-1 176.
[13] MIYAO A, ZHONG H S, MONNA L, et al. Characterization and genetic mapping of simple sequence repeats in the rice genome[J]. DNA Research, 1996, 3(4): 233-238.
[14] MCCOUCH S R, TEYTELMAN L, XU Y B, et al. Development and mapping of 2240 new SSR markers for rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. DNA Research, 2002, 9(6): 199-207.
[15] 程本义, 施勇峰, 沈伟峰, 等. 水稻品种DNA指纹检测技术体系及其应用[J]. 杂交水稻, 2008, 23(1):45-49.
[16] GOFF S A. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica)[J]. Science, 2002, 309(5736): 879-879.
[17] YU J, HU S, WANG J, et al. A draft sequence of the rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica) genome[J]. Science, 2002, 296(5565): 79-92.
[18] 黄学辉. 中国科学家绘制籼稻高质量参考基因组序列图谱[J]. 植物学报, 2017, 52(1):1-3.
[19] WANG W, MAULEON R, HU Z, et al. Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice[J]. Nature, 2018, 557(7706): 43-49.
[20] SHANG L G, LI X X, HE H Y, et al. A super pan-genomic landscape of rice[J]. Cell Research, 2022, 32(10): 878-896.
[21] ZHANG F, XUE H Z, DONG X R, et al. Long-read sequencing of 111 rice genomes reveals significantly larger pan-genomes[J]. Genome Research, 2022, 32(5): 853-863.
[22] ALTSCHUL S F, MADDEN T L, SCH A FFER A A, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 1997, 25(17): 3 389-3 402.
[23] HU B, JIN J P, GUO A Y, et al. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server[J]. Bioinformatics, 2015, 31(8): 1 296-1 297.
[24] 刘坤艳. 水稻全基因组结构变异的鉴定和全基因组重组率的分析[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2014.
[25] 王明湖, 张孝天, 吴国林, 等. SSR标记在宁波地区水稻品种DNA指纹图谱构建及纯度鉴定中的应用[J]. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(6):50-54.
[26] 华蕾, 袁筱萍, 余汉勇, 等. 我国水稻主栽品种SSR多样性的比较分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(2):150-154.
[27] 中国水稻研究所, 中国科学院分子植物科学卓越创新中心, 全国农业技术推广服务中心. NY/T 2745-2021. 水稻品种真实性鉴定 SNP标记法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.
[28] 江汉大学, 武汉明了生物科技有限公司, 中国标准化研究院, 等. GB/T 38551-2020. 植物品种鉴定MNP标记法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发