专论与研究

水稻叶片横向不对称性研究进展

展开
  • 1黔东南民族职业技术学院,贵州 凯里 556000
    2贵州大学 农学院,贵阳 550025
    3贵州大学 山地植物资源保护与种质创新教育部重点实验室,贵阳 550025
    4贵州省农业科学院 水稻研究所,贵阳 550006

收稿日期: 2025-04-24

  网络出版日期: 2025-09-11

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目子课题(2022YFD1901500);国家重点研发计划项目子课题(2022YFD1901505-07);国家自然科学基金(32260531);黔东南民族职业技术学院科研课题重点项目(20zyyjzd02)

Research Progress in Rice Leaf Lateral Asymmetry

Expand
  • 1Qiandongnan National Polytechnic, Kaili, Guizhou 556000, China
    2College of Agronomy, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
    3Laboratory of Plant Resource Conservation and Germplasm Innovation in Mountainous Region, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
    4Rice Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Science, Guiyang 550006, China

Received date: 2025-04-24

  Online published: 2025-09-11

摘要

水稻叶片承载着光合作用、呼吸作用和蒸腾作用等多重生理功能,是干物质积累和籽粒产量的主要贡献者。沿主脉剖分,水稻叶片可一分为二,其两侧在宽度、厚度、SPAD值(叶绿素相对含量)及氮含量等形态与生理特性上表现出显著的差异,呈现出一种独特而明显的横向不对称性。在自然界中,对称和不对称性普遍存在,而生物发育过程中的不对称性被细分为波动不对称、单向不对称和双向不对称三大类。现有研究表明,水稻叶片的横向不对称性属于单向不对称,即主脉的一侧相较于另一侧更宽、更厚、更粗糙,同时SPAD值和氮含量也相对较低。此外,由于水稻植株具有分蘖的生长特性,这使得水稻叶片的横向不对称性在位置分布上呈现出特有的规律。在水稻群体中,叶片的光滑侧(即窄侧和薄侧)无论是居左还是居右,其概率均接近50%。基于此,我们可以将水稻叶片横向不对称性的位置分布特征与这一50%的理想分布概率视为一种波动不对称的表现。从现有文献资料来看,水稻叶宽的部分调控基因也对叶片的横向不对称性程度产生着影响。其中,Leaf lateral symmetry 1LSY1)是目前已知并明确报道的与水稻叶片横向不对称性相关的调控基因。本文从形态、生理和遗传等方面综述了水稻叶片横向不对称性的研究进展,并将其分为单叶、单茎、单株和群体四个层次进行深入探讨。关于水稻叶片横向不对称性在作物学和植物生理学方面的研究文献相对匮乏,其对水稻产量和品质可能产生的显著影响尚需进一步的深入探索和研究。

本文引用格式

李杰, 许桂玲, 冯跃华, 黄佑岗 . 水稻叶片横向不对称性研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2025 , 31(5) : 33 -38 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.05.005

Abstract

Rice leaves, as the primary source of dry matter production and grain yield, exhibit a range of physiological functions, including photosynthesis, respiration, and transpiration. These leaves can be divided along the main vein, revealing distinct morphological and physiological traits on each side, such as variations in width, thickness, SPAD value, and nitrogen content, which manifest a striking and unique lateral asymmetry. Symmetry and asymmetry are widespread in nature, with biological asymmetry being categorized into three types: fluctuating asymmetry, directional asymmetry, and antisymmetry. Existing research has shown that rice leaf lateral asymmetry belongs to directional asymmetry, where one side of the main vein is wider, thicker, and rougher than the other, and also exhibits a lower SPAD value and nitrogen content. Moreover, the tillering characteristic of rice plants imparts a distinct location distribution to the lateral asymmetry of its leaves. Notably, within a rice population, the smooth side (the narrower and thinner side) of the leaf has an almost equal probability (approximately 50%) of appearing on either the left or the right. As such, the location distribution characteristics of rice leaf lateral asymmetry can be considered as exhibiting fluctuating asymmetry with an ideal distribution probability of 50%. Furthermore, certain regulatory genes that influence rice leaf width also affect the degree of rice leaf lateral asymmetry. One such gene is Leaf Lateral Symmetry 1 (LSY1), which has been clearly linked to rice leaf lateral asymmetry. In this paper, we review the progress of research on rice leaf lateral asymmetry from morphological, physiological, and genetic standpoints, and classify rice leaf transverse asymmetry into four levels: single leaf, single stem, single plant, and population. However, there is a limited amount of literature on rice leaf transverse asymmetry in the fields of crop science and plant physiology, and further exploration is needed to determine whether it significantly impacts rice yield and quality.

参考文献

[1] 蔡晶, 王晓光, 季芝娟, 等. 水稻叶片形态的遗传与分子生物学研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2008, 14(6):5-11.
[2] 周开达, 马玉清, 刘太清, 等. 杂交水稻亚种间重穗型组合选育 ——杂交水稻超高产育种的理论与实践[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 1995, 13(4):403-407.
[3] KHUSH G S. Prospects and approaches to increasing the genetic yield potential of rice[M]// EVENSON R E, HETDT R W, HOSSAIN M, eds. Rice Research in Asia,Progress and Priorities. Wallingford, UK: CAB International and IRRI, 1996:59-71.
[4] 袁隆平. 杂交水稻超高产育种[J]. 杂交水稻, 1997, 12(6):4-9.
[5] 常硕其, 粟琳, 欧阳翔. 水稻产量提高与光合作用之间相互关系[J]. 生命科学, 2024, 36(10):1 305-1 310.
[6] 许娜, 徐铨, 徐正进, 等. 水稻株型生理生态与遗传基础研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7):1 735-1 746.
[7] ISHII R. Photosynthesis and respiration in a single leaf[M]// MATSUO T, KUMAZAWA K, ISHII R, et al. Science of the Rice Plant Physiology. Tokyo, Japan: Food and Agriculture Policy Research Center,1995:491-495.
[8] CHEN Y D, ZHANG X, ZHOU X Q, et al. Preliminary studies on thickness of nondestructive rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaf blade[J]. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2007, 6(7):802-807.
[9] YUAN S, LI Y, PENG S B. Leaf lateral asymmetry in morphological and physiological traits of rice plant[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6):e129832.
[10] 李杰, 冯跃华, 麻井彪, 等. 2个超级杂交水稻剑叶主脉两侧SPAD值的差异表现[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(4):777-786.
[11] LI J, FENG Y H, PENG J F, et al. Location distribution characteristics in leaf lateral asymmetry of hybrid indica rice[J]. Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany, 2020, 89(3):657-666.
[12] YUAN S, GORON T L, HUANG L Y, et al. Rice leaf lateral asymmetry in the relationship between spad and area-based nitrogen concentration[J]. Symmetry (Basel), 2017, 9(6):83.
[13] 李杰, 冯跃华, 牟桂婷, 等. 剪叶、粘叶处理对水稻剑叶主脉两侧SPAD值及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2018, 24(6):40-46.
[14] 姚栋萍, 刘春林, 吴丹, 等. 水稻叶形遗传调控机理的研究进展[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2014(10):6-9.
[15] 饶玉春, 胡娟, 金哲伦, 等. 水稻叶形控制基因的挖掘及分析[J]. 浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 42(3):316-323.
[16] 陈达刚, 周新桥, 李丽君, 等. 水稻叶厚性状的研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2015, 5(11):22-25.
[17] 陈洪娟, 商晨阳, 黄梅艳, 等. 水稻叶片夹角调控机制的研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2023, 21(13):4 427-4 437.
[18] 李蓓, 莫凯琴, 马银花. 水稻卷叶基因研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2021, 27(6):14-18.
[19] 戴若惠, 钱心妤, 孙静蕾, 等. 水稻叶色调控机制及相关基因研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2023, 58(5):799-812.
[20] 冯慧, 吴孝波, 黄强, 等. 水稻两系窄叶突变体Fz1S的表型分析与基因定位[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(12):2 702-2 706.
[21] 徐静, 王莉, 钱前, 等. 水稻叶片形态建成分子调控机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(5):767-774.
[22] 陈代波, 程式华, 曹立勇. 水稻窄叶性状的研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2010, 16(3):1-4.
[23] 潘境涛, 谢红卫, 钱明娟, 等. 水稻窄叶突变体相关基因的研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2017, 15(12):4 879-4 887.
[24] ZHANG X, ZONG J, LIU J H, et al. Genome-wide analysis of WOX gene family in rice, sorghum, maize, Arabidopsis and poplar[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2010, 52(11):1 016-1 026.
[25] HONDA E, YEW C L, YOSHIKAWA T, et al. LEAF LATERAL SYMMETRY1, a member of the WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX3 gene family, regulates lateral organ development differentially from other paralogs, NARROW LEAF2 and NARROW LEAF3 in rice[J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2018, 59(2):376-391.
[26] OBARA M, IKEDA K, ITOH J I, et al. Characterization of leaf lateral symmetiy 1 mutant in rice[J]. Breeding Science, 2004, 54:157-163.
[27] 方云霞, 朱丽, 潘江杰, 等. 水稻窄叶突变体nal10的鉴定与基因精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(6):587-594.
[28] 严松, 严长杰, 顾铭洪. 植物叶发育的分子机理[J]. 遗传, 2008, 30(9):1 127-1 135.
[29] 柴靓, 何靖, 高志宏, 等. 植物叶片发育及形态建成的研究进展[J]. 种子, 2018, 37(3):46-48.
[30] 龙海馨, 邱海阳, MUHAMMAD U, 等. 水稻窄叶突变体nal20的表型分析与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(9):1 301-1 310.
[31] MATHER K. Genetical control of stability in development[J]. Heredity, 1953, 7:297-336.
[32] THODAY J M. Homeostasis in a selection experiment[J]. Heredity, 1958, 12:401-415.
[33] PALMER A R, STROBECK C. Fluctuating asymmetry: Measurement, analysis, patterns[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1986, 17:391-421.
[34] 张晖, 陈秋生. 鸡胚器官左右不对称性发育的研究进展[J]. 动物医学进展, 2005, 26(12):29-35.
[35] WARNER J F, MCCLAY D R. Left-right asymmetry in the sea urchin[J]. Genesis, 2014, 52(6):481-487.
[36] DJENOUNE L, MAHAMDEH M, TRUONG T V, et al. Cilia function as calcium-mediated mechanosensors that instruct left-right asymmetry[J]. Science, 2023, 379(6627):71-78.
[37] 陆宏, 党洁, 霍正浩, 等. 生物体波动性不对称与人类疾病的研究进展[J]. 宁夏医科大学学报, 2011, 33(9):899-901.
[38] GRAHAM J, ÖZENER B. Fluctuating asymmetry of human populations: a review[J]. Symmetry (Basel), 2016, 8(12):154.
[39] 周敏, 朱学农, 黄译, 等. 睾丸不对称性对宁都黄公鸡体重、第二性征的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2024, 60(9):185-187, 191.
[40] GAVRIKOV D E, ZVEREV V, RACHENKO M A, et al. Experimental evidence questions the relationship between stress and fluctuating asymmetry in plants[J]. Symmetry (Basel), 2023, 15(2):339.
[41] ZVEREV V, LAMA A D, KOZLOV M V. Fluctuating asymmetry of birch leaves did not increase with pollution and drought stress in a controlled experiment[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 84:283-289.
[42] MÁJEKOVÁ M, SPRINGER B, FERENC V, et al. Leaf fluctuating asymmetry is not a reliable indicator of stress[J]. Functional Ecology, 2024, 38(6):1 447-1 457.
[43] HAGEN S B, IMS R A, YOCCOZ N G, et al. Fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of elevation stress and distribution limits in mountain birch (Betula pubescens)[J]. Plant Ecology, 2008, 195(2):157-163.
[44] BARANOV S G, ZYKOV I E, KUZNETSOVA D D, et al. Environmental factors influencing expression of bilateral symmetrical traits[J]. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, 421(5):52 029.
[45] EROFEEVA E A, YAKIMOV B N. Change of leaf trait asymmetry type in Tilia cordata Mill. and Betula pendula Roth under air pollution[J]. Symmetry (Basel), 2020, 12(5):727.
[46] SINCLAIR C, HOFFMANN A A. Developmental stability as a potential tool in the early detection of salinity stress in wheat[J]. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 2003, 164:325-331.
[47] MAL T K, UVEGES J L, TURK K W. Fluctuating asymmetry as an ecological indicator of heavy metal stress in Lythrum salicaria[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2002, 1(3):189-195.
[48] ALVES-SILVA E, DEL-CLARO K. Effect of post-fire resprouting on leaffluctuating asymmetry, extrafloral nectarquality, and ant plant herbivore interactions[J]. Naturwissenschaften, 2013, 100(6):525-532.
[49] BLACK-SAMUELSSON S, ANDERSSON S. The effect of nutrient stress on developmental instability in leaves of Acer platanoides (Aceraceae) and Betula pen-dula (Betulaceae)[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2003, 90:1 107-1 112.
[50] BARANOV S G, ZYKOV I E, KUZNETSOVA D D, et al. Evaluation of shape and asymmetry in rye leaf[J]. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, 548(3):32 001.
[51] CHITWOOD D H, HEADLAND L R, RANJAN A, et al. Leaf asymmetry as a developmental constraint imposed by auxin-dependent phyllotactic patterning[J]. Plant Cell, 2012, 24(6):2 318-2 327.
[52] MARTINEZ C C, CHITWOOD D H, SMITH R S, et al. Left-right leaf asymmetry in decussate and distichous phyllotactic systems[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 2016, 371:20 150 412.
[53] NIKIFOROU C, MANETAS Y. Ecological stress memory: evidence in two out of seven species through the examination of the relationship between leaf fluctuating asymmetry and photosynthesis[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 74:530-534.
[54] CHITWOOD D H, NAYLOR D T, THAMMAPICHAI P, et al. Conflict between intrinsic leaf asymmetry and phyllotaxis in the resupinate leaves of alstroemeria psittacina[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2012, 3:182.
[55] 程如意, 范红军, 宋洁, 等. 太行山猕猴锁骨方向不对称研究[J]. 河南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 42(3):125-128.
[56] PELABON C, HANSEN T F, CARLSON M L, et al. Patterns of asymmetry in the twining vine Dalechampia scandens (Euphorbiaceae): Ontogenetic and hierarchical perspectives[J]. New Phytologist, 2006, 170(1):65-74.
[57] 吕川根, 宗寿余, 姚克敏, 等. 水稻叶片形态因子的遗传力分析[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2006, 22(2):95-99.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发