专论与研究

土壤肥力和施氮量对双季稻田氧化亚氮排放的互作效应

展开
  • 1教育部作物生理生态与遗传育种重点实验室/江西农业大学,南昌 330045
    2南昌市新建区农业技术推广中心,南昌 330038

收稿日期: 2025-04-25

  网络出版日期: 2025-09-11

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(31960397)

Interactive Effects of Soil Fertility and Nitrogen Application Rate on N2O Emissions from Double-Cropping Rice Paddies

Expand
  • 1Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education/Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
    2Agricultural Technology Extension Center of Xinjian District, Nanchang 330038, China

Received date: 2025-04-25

  Online published: 2025-09-11

摘要

土壤肥力和施氮量是影响稻田氧化亚氮(N2O)排放的重要因素,但二者的互作效应尚不清晰。本研究依据土壤有机质含量,选取低肥力土壤(FL)、中肥力土壤(FM)和高肥力土壤(FH)3种类型田块,并设置4组氮肥施用水平(即0、90、150、210 kg/hm2,分别用N0、N90、N150、N210表示),旨在阐明土壤肥力和施氮量对红壤性双季稻田N2O排放的互作效应。结果表明,提升土壤肥力能够显著降低双季稻田的N2O排放量;增加施氮量能够提高早稻季的N2O排放量。对早稻季N2O排放而言, FH和FM相较于FL分别降低34.3%和16.7%,N150和N210处理比N0处理分别显著增加11.3%和21.8%, N90处理与N0处理差异不显著;对于晚稻季N2O排放而言,FH和FM相较于FL分别降低30.0%和13.7%,而不同氮肥处理之间则无显著差异。施氮量和土壤肥力在早稻季稻田N2O排放上存在显著的互作效应,在FL田块中,与N0相比,N210处理使早稻季N2O排放量显著提高50.7%,而N90和N150处理则无显著影响;在FM和FH田块中,各施氮处理对N2O排放均无显著影响。因此,提升土壤肥力的同时配施适宜的氮肥用量有利于稻田N2O减排。

本文引用格式

祝建民, 付文涛, 孙文霞, 张宇祥, 黄山, 孙艳妮 . 土壤肥力和施氮量对双季稻田氧化亚氮排放的互作效应[J]. 中国稻米, 2025 , 31(5) : 71 -75 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.05.011

Abstract

Soil fertility and nitrogen application rate are important factors influencing nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from paddy fields, but the interaction effects between these two remain unclear. In this study, three types of field plots (FL, low-fertility soil; FM, medium-fertility soil; FH, high-fertility soil) were selected based on the soil organic matter content, and four levels of nitrogen application rates were set (i.e., 0, 90, 150, and 210 kg/hm2, represented by N0, N90, N150, and N210, respectively), aiming to elucidate the interaction effects of soil fertility and nitrogen application rate on N2O emissions from double-cropping rice paddies. The results showed that improving soil fertility significantly reduced N2O emissions from double-cropping rice paddies, whereas increasing nitrogen application rate increased N2O emissions during the early rice season. For N2O emissions during the early rice season, FH and FM decreased emissions by 34.3% and 16.7%, respectively, compared to FL. Compared with N0 treatment, N150 and N210 treatments during the early rice season increased N2O emissions by 11.3% and 21.8%, respectively, while there was no significant difference between N90 and N0 treatment. For N2O emissions during the late rice season, FH and FM decreased emissions by 30.0% and 13.7%, respectively, compared to FL, while no significant differences among different nitrogen fertilizer treatments. There was a significant interaction effect between nitrogen application rate and soil fertility on N2O emissions during the early rice season. In the FL plot, compared to N0 treatment, the N210 treatment significantly increased N2O emissions by 50.7%, while the N90 and N150 treatments showed no significant difference. In the FM and FH plots, none of the nitrogen fertilizer treatments had significant effects on N2O emissions. Therefore, improving soil fertility combined with appropriate nitrogen application rate is beneficial for mitigating N2O emission in paddy fields.

参考文献

[1] AL-GHUSSAIN L. Global warming: Review on driving forces and mitigation[J]. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 2018, 38:13-21.
[2] GORH D, BARUAH K K. Estimation of methane and nitrous oxide emission from wetland rice paddies with reference to global warming potential[J]. Environmetal Science and Pollution Research International, 2019, 26:16 331-16 344.
[3] TIAN Z, NIU Y, FAN D, et al. Maintaining rice production while mitigating methane and nitrous oxide emissions from paddy fields in China: Evaluating tradeoffs by using coupled agricultural systems models[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2018, 159:175-186.
[4] BRACKEN C J, LANIGAN G J, RICHARDS K G, et al. Sward composition and soil moisture conditions affect nitrous oxide emissions and soil nitrogen dynamics following urea-nitrogen application[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 722:137 780.
[5] HU Y M, WANG L, CHEN F X, et al. Soil carbon sequestration efficiency under continuous paddy rice cultivation and excessive nitrogen fertilization in South China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, 213:105 108.
[6] WANG C, LIU J, SHEN J, et al. Effects of biochar amendment on net greenhouse gas emissions and soil fertility in a double rice cropping system: A 4-year field experiment[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2018, 262:83-96.
[7] MADELINE G, NICHOLAS M, BAGGS E M, et al. Soil nitrate reducing processes-drivers, mechanisms for spatial variation, and significance for nitrous oxide production[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2012, 3:407.
[8] 石洪艾, 尤孟阳, 李禄军, 等. 长期施用有机物料下黑土氮素有效性及其与作物产量的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31:2 283-2 288.
[9] ROBERTSON G P, GROFFMAN P M. Nitrogen transformations[A]// Ecology and Biochemistry(Fourth Edition)[M]. Burlington, Massachusetts, USA: Acadimic Press, 2015.
[10] 宫亮, 金丹丹, 牛世伟, 等. 长期定位氮肥减施对水稻产量和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(3):42-46.
[11] HUANG M, JIANG P, SHAN S, et al. Higher yields of hybrid rice do not depend on nitrogen fertilization under moderate to high soil fertility conditions[J]. Rice (NY), 2017, 10:43.
[12] 吴茜虞, 续勇波, 雷宝坤, 等. 粪肥替代对稻田土壤氮素、有机质含量及水稻产量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2023, 36(10):2 217-2 223.
[13] 严奉君, 孙永健, 马均, 等. 不同土壤肥力条件下麦秆还田与氮肥运筹对杂交稻氮素利用、产量及米质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(1):56-64.
[14] 宁川川, 王建武, 蔡昆争. 有机肥对土壤肥力和土壤环境质量的影响研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25(1):175-181.
[15] 田小明, 李俊华, 王成, 等. 连续3年施用生物有机肥对土壤养分、微生物生物量及酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤, 2014, 46(3):481-488.
[16] 高琳, 潘志华, 杨书运, 等. 碳源和巨大芽孢杆菌添加对土壤微生物环境及N2O、CH4排放的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2016, 37(6):645-653.
[17] LI J L, LI Y E, WAN Y F, et al. Combination of modified nitrogen fertilizers and water saving irrigation can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase rice yield[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 315:1-10.
[18] WANG J Y, CHEN Z Z, MA Y C, et al. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions as affected by organic-inorganic mixed fertilizer from a rice paddy in southeast China[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2013, 13:1 408-1 417.
[19] HOU W F, XUE X X, LI X K, et al. Interactive effects of nitrogen and potassium on: Grain yield, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency of rice in low potassium fertility soil in China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2019, 236:14-23.
[20] 付文涛. 土壤肥力和施氮量对双季稻稻米品质和稻田氮素损失的影响[J]. 南昌:江西农业大学, 2023.
[21] 廖萍, 眭锋, 汤军, 等. 施用生物炭对双季稻田综合温室效应和温室气体排放强度的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(9):1 821-1 830.
[22] 王森, 廖文华, 郭巨秋, 等. 石灰氮对土壤NH3、N2O排放的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2019, 38(12):2 728-2 735.
[23] JIANG Y, LIAO P, VAN GESTEL N, et al. Lime application lowers the global warming potential of a double rice cropping system[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 325:1-8.
[24] JU C X, BURESH R J, WANG Z Q, et al. Root and shoot traits for rice varieties with higher grain yield and higher nitrogen use efficiency at lower nitrogen rates application[J]. Field Crops Research, 2015, 175:47-55.
[25] 唐刚. 土壤肥力和施氮量对双季稻产量和氮肥利用效率的影响[J]. 南昌:江西农业大学, 2021.
[26] 李红燕, 胡铁成, 曹群虎, 等. 旱地不同绿肥品种和种植方式提高土壤肥力的效果[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(5):1 310-1 318.
[27] 贾震, 付文涛, 王海媛, 等. 红壤稻田不同肥力水平和施氮量对早晚季甲烷排放的互作效应[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(6):61-66.
[28] 刘时光, 王晓玲, 王元涛, 等. 稻田土壤氧化亚氮产生潜势、反硝化功能基因丰度和群落结构的垂向分布[J]. 环境科学学报, 2020, 40(3):1 040-1 050.
[29] 孙英杰, 吴昊, 王亚楠. 硝化反硝化过程中N2O释放影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(2):384-388.
[30] SAHA D, KAYE J P, BHOWMIK A, et al. Organic fertility inputs synergistically increase denitrification-derived nitrous oxide emissions in agroecosystems[J]. Ecological Applications, 2021, 31:e02403.
[31] 秦碧蓉, 尤赛雅, 陈书融, 等. 不同施氮水平对双季稻产量、氮素利用率及稻田氮素平衡的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2024(2):89-96.
[32] 刘少文, 殷敏, 褚光, 等. 土壤氮激发效应及其微生物机理研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(4):303-312.
[33] KIM G W, KIM P J, KHAN M I, et al. Effect of rice planting on nitrous oxide (N2O) emission under different levels of nitrogen fertilization[J]. Agronomy, 2021, 11(2):217.
[34] 李熠凡, 李烙布, 李伏生. 不同灌溉施氮模式对稻田甲烷和氧化亚氮排放的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(12):44-53.
[35] LIANG K M, ZHONG X H, HUANG N R, et al. Nitrogen losses and greenhouse gas emissions under different N and water management in a subtropical double-season rice cropping system[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 609:46-57.
[36] 张冉, 赵鑫, 濮超, 等. 中国农田秸秆还田土壤N2O排放及其影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(22):1-6.
[37] 段永康, 杨海燕, 吴文龙, 等. 植物氮素吸收、转运和同化的分子机制[J]. 福建农业学报, 2022, 37(4):547-554.
[38] WU Y, LIN S, LIU T, et al. Effect of crop residue returns on N2O emissions from red soil in China[J]. Soil Use and Management, 2015, 32:80-88.
[39] 廖萍, 刘磊, 何宇轩, 等. 施石灰和秸秆还田对双季稻产量和氮素吸收的互作效应[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(1):84-92.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发