
我国主要产区水稻主导品种稻米品质比较分析
收稿日期: 2025-06-07
网络出版日期: 2025-11-07
基金资助
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(CPSIBRF-CNRRI-202407);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(Y2024JC07);国家水稻产业技术体系项目(CARS-01);浙江省“尖兵”“领雁”研发攻关计划项目(2023C02014)
Quality Analysis of Leading Rice Varieties in Major Production Areas of China
Received date: 2025-06-07
Online published: 2025-11-07
为全面、科学地了解我国水稻主导品种的品质状况,本研究收集了2023年在14个省份主导种植的72份水稻样品,分析并比较了东北粳稻、南方粳稻、长江流域籼稻、东南沿海籼稻以及东南沿海早籼稻在加工品质、外观品质、蒸煮食用品质、糊化特性和营养品质方面的差异。在粒型方面,东北粳稻以短粒型和中粒型品种为主,南方粳稻以短粒型品种居多,长江流域籼稻和东南沿海籼稻则以长粒型品种为主,而东南沿海早籼稻均为中粒型品种。在加工品质方面,粳稻明显优于籼稻。东北粳稻、东南沿海籼稻和长江流域籼稻的外观品质较好,而东南沿海早籼稻和南方粳稻垩白度较高、透明度较差,外观品质相对逊色。除东南沿海早籼稻外,其他类型主导品种均展现出良好的蒸煮食用品质,优质率达到90.0%以上。东南沿海早籼稻直链淀粉含量较高,符合米粉专用稻的要求,具有良好的加工用途。糊化特性分析结果显示,与籼稻相比,粳稻的冷胶黏度、崩解值和回冷值较低,米饭质地柔软且弹性较好,更具嚼劲,米饭冷却后更为柔软;与东北粳稻相比,南方粳稻的冷胶黏度、消减值和回冷值更低,崩解值更高,米饭更为柔软且黏性更强,但弹性略逊于北方粳稻,冷却后米饭依然柔软。东南沿海早籼稻的峰值黏度、热浆黏度、冷胶黏度、消减值和回冷值最高,崩解值最低,米饭口感硬而糙,冷却后较硬,但淀粉不易降解,适合加工米线等产品;长江流域籼稻和东南沿海籼稻的糊化特性无显著差异。总体而言,我国水稻主导品种具有优良的蒸煮食用品质或加工用途。
胡贤巧, 卢林, 符渊淼, 姜慧萍, 闪月, 陈铭学, 丁利群 . 我国主要产区水稻主导品种稻米品质比较分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2025 , 31(6) : 12 -19 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.06.004
To comprehensively and scientifically understand the quality status of the leading rice varieties in China, this study collected 72 rice samples that were predominantly cultivated in 14 provinces in 2023. It analyzed and compared the differences in processing quality, appearance quality, cooking and eating quality, pasting characteristics, and nutritional quality among Northeastern japonica, Southern japonica, Yangtze River Basin indica, Southeastern Coastal indica, and Southeastern Coastal early indica rice. Northeastern japonica rice were dominated by short-grain and medium-grain varieties, Southern japonica rice were dominated by short-grain varieties, Yangtze River Basin indica rice and Southeast Coastal indica rice were dominated by long-grain varieties, and Southeast Coastal early indica rice were all medium-grain varieties. The processing quality of japonica rice was significantly better than that of indica rice, and better than that of early indica rice. Northeastern japonica rice, Southeast Coastal indica rice and Yangtze River Basin indica rice had good appearance quality, while Southeast Coastal Early indica rice and Southern japonica rice had high chalkiness, poor transparency, and relatively poor appearance quality. Except for Southeast Coastal early indica rice, other types of leading varieties had good cooking and eating quality, with a high quality rate of more than 90.0%. Southeast Coastal early indica rice had high amylose content, met the requirements of special rice for rice noodles, and had good processing use. Compared with indica rice, japonica rice had lower cool gel viscosity, breakdown viscosity, and consistency viscosity, indicating that the cooked rice would be softer, more elastic and chewy, and the texture of cold rice was softer. Compared with the Northeastern japonica rice, the Southern japonica rice had lower cool gel viscosity, setback value viscosity and consistency viscosity, and higher breakdown viscosity, indicating that the cooked rice would be softer and more viscous, but less elastic than that of Northeastern japonica rice, and the texture of cold rice would be softer; the Southeastern Coastal early indica rice possessed the highest peak viscosity, hot viscosity, cool viscosity, setback viscosity and consistency viscosity, and lowest breakdown viscosity, indicating that it had a firm and coarse texture of cooked rice and hard texture of cold rice, but contained starch resistant to degradation, making it highly suitable for processing into products such as rice noodles; no significant difference was observed in the pasting characteristics between Yangtze River Basin indica rice and the Southeast Coastal indica rice. Overall, all the leading rice varieties showed excellent cooking edible quality or processing quality.
| [1] | 罗玉坤, 朱智伟, 金连登, 等. 从普查结果看我国水稻品种品质的现状[J]. 中国稻米, 2002, 8(1):5-9. |
| [2] | 朱智伟. 当前我国稻米品质状况分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2006, 12(1):1-4. |
| [3] | 胡贤巧, 张卫星, 邵雅芳, 等. 我国近20年稻米品质优质率状况分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(4):84-87. |
| [4] | 张卫星, 马晨怡, 袁玉伟, 等. 我国水稻三大优势产区稻米品质现状及区域差异[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(5):12-18. |
| [5] | 邵雅芳, 郑欣, 朱大伟, 等. 2002—2022年中国籼稻品质的时空分布和发展状况[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2024, 50(3):418-430. |
| [6] | 张家秀. 浅谈我国优质稻米产业的现状及其发展[J]. 粮食加工, 2008(3):49-50. |
| [7] | 林赵淼, 郑德益, 张新城, 等. 稻米垩白形成的生理与分子机制研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2015, 21(4):14-19. |
| [8] | 冯向前, 殷敏, 王孟佳, 等. 南方稻区“早籼晚粳”栽培模式晚季灌浆期气象因子对晚粳稻品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1):46-63. |
| [9] | 廖斌, 张桂莲. 水稻垩白的研究进展[J]. 作物研究, 2015, 29(1):77-83. |
| [10] | 朱大伟, 章林平, 陈铭学, 等. 中国优质稻品种品质及食味感官评分值的特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7):1271-1 283. |
| [11] | 张恒栋, 黄敏, 邹应斌, 等. 米粉稻籽粒直链淀粉积累特性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7):1354-1 364. |
| [12] | 李茂柏, 王萃, 顾玉龙, 等. 上海软米品种品质性状分析与评价[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(2):77-79. |
| [13] | 陈庭木, 王宝祥, 胡明珠, 等. 水稻低直链淀粉资源筛选[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(5):21-25. |
| [14] | 朱满山, 汤述翥, 顾铭洪. RVA谱在稻米蒸煮食用品质评价及遗传育种方面的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(8):59-64. |
| [15] | 李刚, 邓其明, 李双成, 等. 稻米淀粉RVA谱特征与品质性状的相关性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(1):99-102. |
| [16] | HU X Q, ZHANG W X, LU L, et al. Comparison of quality of appearance, cooking quality, and protein content of green-labeled rice and conventional rice[J]. Cereal Chemistry, 2022, 99(4): 873-883. |
| [17] | 翁雪莲, 姜丽秋, 唐树鹏, 等. 稻米淀粉、蛋白质和脂质与蒸煮食味品质关系研究进展[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2024, 43(3):121-131. |
| [18] | 石吕. 水稻精米蛋白质含量与稻米品质变化的关系[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2017. |
| [19] | 路凯, 赵庆勇, 周丽慧, 等. 稻米蛋白质含量与食味品质的关系及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2020, 36(5):1305-1 311. |
| [20] | 赵一童. 蛋白质含量对水稻稻米品质及其米粉糊化回生特性影响[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2022. |
| [21] | 周诚, 曾鑫, 章岩, 等. 稻米脂质与稻米品质间关系及其影响因素[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2024, 39(4):180-188. |
| [22] | 陈庭木, 邢运高, 孙志广, 等. 水稻高脂肪含量资源筛选[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(8):74-77. |
| [23] | 顾丹丹, 刘正辉, 刘杨, 等. 粳稻精米脂肪含量和组分对蒸煮品质的影响及其对氮素的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(11):2001-2 010. |
| [24] | 于永红, 周鹏, 段彬伍, 等. 水稻脂肪含量分布及与食味品质的相关性分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2007(6):669-671. |
| [25] | 周诚. 基于染色体单片段代换系水稻稻米脂肪含量与品质关系研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2024. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |