专论与研究

早晚稻品种米饭淀粉消化特性比较

展开
  • 1作物生理与分子生物学教育部重点实验室/国家水稻工程技术研究中心/湖南农业大学,长沙 410128
    2湖南省作物研究所,长沙 410125
    3湖南省浏阳市永安镇农业农村综合服务中心,湖南 浏阳 410323
第一联系人:

第一作者:lli_rpe@163.com

收稿日期: 2025-05-19

  网络出版日期: 2025-11-07

基金资助

国家水稻产业技术体系项目(CARS-01)

Comparison on Digestion Properties of Cooked Rice of Early- and Late-season Rice Varieties

Expand
  • 1Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Crop Physiology and Molecular Biology/National Rice Engineering Technology Research Center/Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
    2Hunan Crop Research Institute, Changsha 410125, China
    3Yong’an Town Agricultural and Rural Comprehensive Service Center, Liuyang, Hunan 410323, China
First author contact:

1st author: lli_rpe@163.com

Received date: 2025-05-19

  Online published: 2025-11-07

摘要

In order to reveal the differences in starch digestibility characteristics of cooked rice between early- and late-season rice cultivars, three early-season rice varieties, namely Zhongjiazao 17, Zhongzao 39, and Xiangzaoxian 24, and three late-season rice varieties, namely Yuzhenxiang, Xiangwanxian 17, and Meixiangzhan 2, were used as experimental materials to compare the physicochemical properties (rice starch composition, protein content, and starch RVA characteristics) and digestion properties of cooked rice between early- and late-season rice varieties. The results showed that, compared with late-season rice, the active digestion duration of early-season rice increased by 52.34%, and the glucose production rate decreased by 38.20%. There was no significant difference in total glucose production between early- and late-season rice. The amylose content, the ratio of amylose content to amylopectin content, and protein content of early-season rice were 44.77%, 69.23%, and 23.27% higher than those of late-season rice, respectively, while the total starch content and amylopectin content were 3.72% and 16.14% lower than those of late-season rice, respectively. Compared with late-season rice, the through viscosity, final viscosity, setback viscosity, consistency viscosity and peaking time of early-season rice increased by 33.66%, 33.43%, 420.00%, 32.96%和 5.26%, respectively. Meanwhile, the peak viscosity, breakdown viscosity, and pasting temperature of early-season rice decreased by 6.34%, 50.12%, and 1.82%, respectively. Correlation analysis showed that the glucose production rate of cooked rice was significantly negatively correlated with amylose content, the ratio of amylose content to amylopectin content, through viscosity, final viscosity, setback viscosity, and consistency viscosity, and was significantly positively correlated with total starch content, amylopectin content, peak viscosity, and breakdown viscosity. In summary, compared with late-season rice varieties, early-season rice varieties have higher amylose content, ratio of amylose content to amylopectin content, through viscosity, final viscosity, consistency viscosity and setback viscosity, but lower total starch content, amylopectin content, peak viscosity, and breakdown viscosity. These differences result in a reduced glucose production rate and prolonged active digestion duration for early-season rice.

本文引用格式

李莉, 胡丽琴, 邓启长, 曹威, 曹放波, 陈佳娜, 黄敏 . 早晚稻品种米饭淀粉消化特性比较[J]. 中国稻米, 2025 , 31(6) : 20 -24 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.06.005

参考文献

[1] HUANG M, HU L, CHEN J N, et al. In vitro testing indicates an accelerated rate of digestion of starch into glucose of cooked rice with the development of low amylose rice in China[J]. Food Chemistry: X, 2022, 14: 100 278.
[2] 张超. 基于淀粉结构解析南方半糯性粳稻蒸煮食味品质与消化特性[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2021.
[3] HUANG M, HU L Q. Low glycemic index: The next target for rice production in China?[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(6): 1 727-1 729.
[4] 李志航. 典型大米制品的质构与消化性能的物质基础研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2018.
[5] HU E A, PAN A, MALIK V, et al. White rice consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: Meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. British Medical Journal, 2012, 344: e1454.
[6] 李部, 潘立旭, 杨勇, 等. 高直链淀粉含量水稻品种间淀粉消化特性的差异分析[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2021, 42(2):18-25.
[7] 张崇华, 王尚明, 段里成, 等. 播期对江西省双季稻营养物质含量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(14):5-10.
[8] 李清华, 郑长林. 福建省水稻新品种米质鉴定与评价[J]. 福建稻麦科技, 2024, 42(1):33-37.
[9] 胡溶, 胡田, 陈光辉, 等. 生物炭与氮肥配施对米粉稻产量与稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2023, 37(6):551-555.
[10] 王晶, 戴常军, 王翠玲, 等. 稻米淀粉影响食味品质机理的研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(1):35-43.
[11] 王丰, 程方民, 钟连进, 等. 早籼稻米RVA谱特性的品种间差异及其温度效应特征[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(4):328-332.
[12] 朱旭东, 熊振民, 罗玉坤, 等. 异季栽培对稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 1993, 7(3):172-174.
[13] CHANG U J, HONG Y H, JUNG E Y, et al. Rice and the glycemic index[M]//Wheat and Rice in Disease Prevention and Health. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press, 2014: 357-363.
[14] KAUR B, RANAWANA V, HENRY J. The glycemic index of rice and rice products: A review, and table of GI values[J]. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2016, 56(2): 215-236.
[15] 胡丽琴, 肖正午, 方升亮, 等. 种植季节对高直链淀粉水稻品种淀粉消化特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9):2347-2 357.
[16] HUANG M. The association between the risk of diabetes and white rice consumption in China: Existing knowledge and new research directions from the crop perspective[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(10): 3 234-3 236.
[17] LOPEZ-BARON N, GU Y, VASANTHAN T, et al. Plant proteins mitigate in vitro wheat starch digestibility[J]. Food Hydrocolloids, 2017, 69: 19-27.
[18] PANLASIGUI L N, THOMPSON L U, JULIANO B O, et al. Rice varieties with similar amylose content differ in starch digestibility and glycemic response in humans[J]. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1991, 54(5): 871-877.
[19] BENMOUSSA M, MOLDENHAUER K A K, HAMAKER B R. et al. Rice amylopectin fine structure variability affects starch digestion properties[J]. Agricultural Food Chemistry, 2007, 55(4): 1 475-1 479.
[20] HUANG M, HU L, CAO J, et al. Texture and digestion properties of hybrid rice: A comparison between two cultivars released 18 years apart[J]. Food Chemistry: X, 2022, 13: 100 215.
[21] 肖正午, 胡丽琴, 黎星, 等. 米粉稻早季与晚季种植品质差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2):451-463.
[22] FITZGERALD M A, RAHMAN S, RESURRECCION A P, et al. Identification of a major genetic determinant of glycaemic index in rice[J]. Rice, 2011, 4: 66-74.
[23] OHTSUBO K, NAKAMURA S, MAEDA S, et al. Possibility of diabetes prevention by high-amylose rice super hard rice[J]. Journal of Diabetes and Obesity, 2016, 3(1): 1-7.
[24] 李林, 沙国栋, 陆景淮. 水稻灌浆期温光因子对稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 1989, 10(3):33-38.
[25] YIN X, ZHANG H, CHEN J, et al. Performance of soft rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in early season in China[J]. Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany, 2020, 89(1): 97-102.
[26] 李颖颖, 李霞, 杨杰. 稻米淀粉消化率的研究进展及其内外影响因素[J]. 现代食品科技, 2024, 40(10):1-13.
[27] SINGH J, DARTOIS A, KAUR L. Starch digestibility in food matrix: a review[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2010, 21(4): 168-180.
[28] BELLO-PEREZ L A, FLORES-SILVA P C, AGAMA-ACEMA E, et al. Starch digestibility: past, present, and future[J]. Journal of the Science of Food Agriculture, 2020, 100: 5 009-5 016.
[29] 李部. 水稻淀粉慢消化特性的结构基础和遗传研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2021.
[30] YI X, LI E, YU S, et al. Combined effects of starch fine molecular structures and water content on starch digestibility of cooked white rice[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules: Structure, Function and Interactions, 2022, 215: 192-202.
[31] 旷娜. 再生季稻米品质与淀粉特性的关系及其对温度的响应[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2021.
[32] HUR S J, LIM B O, DECKER E A, et al. In vitro human digestion models for food applications[J]. Food Chemistry, 2011, 125(1): 1-12.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发