Evaluation on Rice Varieties Resistance to Rice Blast and Rice False Smut in Anhui Province

Expand

Online published: 2014-09-20

Abstract

Resistance of 103 rice varieties to rice blast and rice false smut was evaluated in Anhui Province in 2013. The results of resistance to rice blast showed: 5 varieties and 9 varieties were resistance and middle-resistance respectively(13.59% of the total); 25 varieties were middle-sensibility(24.27% of the total); 33 varieties and 31 varieties were sensibility and high-sensibility, respectively(62.14% of the total). The evaluation results of rice resistance to false smut showed that: 6 varieties and 7 varieties were resistance and middle-resistance respectively(12.62% of the total); 55 varieties were middle-sensibility (53.40% of the total); 29 varieties and 6 varieties were sensibility and high-sensibility respectively(33.98% of the total). Only 3 varieties, G-you6, Y-liangyou1500 and Xieyou118, showed resistance or middle-resistance to both rice blast and false smut.

Cite this article

ZHANG Ai-Fang-1, CHEN Yu-1, YANG Xue-1, WANG Chun-Lin-2, WANG Wen-Xiang-1* . Evaluation on Rice Varieties Resistance to Rice Blast and Rice False Smut in Anhui Province[J]. China Rice, 2014 , 20(5) : 60 -61,64 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2014.05.013

References

[1]    刘伟. 水稻稻瘟病抗性的研究进展[J]. 中国稻米,2010,16(5):32-35.

[2]    李小娟,刘二明,肖启明,等. 稻曲病研究进展[J]. 农药研究与应用,2006,10(3):9-12.

[3]    姜慎,唐春生,谭志琼. 国内外稻曲病研究现状[J]. 热带农业科学,2010,30(3):62-66

[4]    张舒,张求东,罗汉刚,等. 水稻稻曲病的药效试验和防治时期的选定[J]. 华中农业大学学报2007,26(2):178-181.

[5]    贝亚维,胡恒怡,陈亨康,等. 爱苗对水稻纹枯病、稻曲病的防治效果及增产效应分析[J]. 中国稻米,2006(3):43-44.

[6]    张传清,周明国,朱国念. 稻瘟病化学防治药剂的历史沿革与研究现状[J]. 农药学学报,2009,11(1):72-80.
[7]    杨仕华,廖琴. 中国水稻品种试验与审定[M]. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2005:36.

[8]    肖满开. 皖西南近30年来稻瘟病流行规律的分析及对制定监测治理对策的意义[J]. 中国植保导刊,2006,26(6):15-17.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.