Varieties & Technology

Analysis on Yield Components and Economic Efficiency of Ratoon Rice under Simplified Cultivation in Southeast Sichuan Province

Expand
  • 1Rice and Sorghum Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Southwest Rice Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Crop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Deyang, Sichuan 618000, China
    2Agricultural Technique Extension Station of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, China
#the authors contributed equally to this paper: jiangyipeng137@163.com; 402253722@qq.com
*Corresponding author: zhanglin1090@163.com

Received date: 2020-10-13

  Online published: 2021-01-20

Abstract

In order to clarify the effects of simplified cultivations (conventional tillage and transplanting, CTTP;conventional tillage and direct seeding, CTDS; no-tillage and transplanting, NTTP)on yield components and economic efficiency in rice-ratoon rice system, a field experiment with two cultivars(Huanghuazhan and Jinnongsimiao) was conducted in Luzhou in 2017. The characteristics of biomass production, yield and yield components and economic efficiency of first season rice and ratoon rice were analyzed. The results showed that there was no significant difference in grain yield of first season rice among three cultivation methods. The grain yield of first season rice under CTDS was 3.5% higher than CTTP. The grain yield of first season rice under NTTP was equivalent to CTTP. The trend of the ratoon rice yield was CTTP>NTTP>CTDS, but the difference were not significant. Compared with CTTP, the first season rice under CTDS was characterized by more panicles per unit area but less spikelets per panicle, higher dry matter weight but lower harvest index at maturity; the ratoon rice under CTDS was characterized by more panicles per unit area but less spikelets per panicle and lower seed setting rate. The difference in effective panicles, spikelets per panicle, seed setting rate, thousand grain weight, dry matter weight and harvest index were relatively small between NTTP and CTTP. There were no significantly difference in output value among different cultivation methods, but the difference of economic benefits were large. Compared with CTTP, the economic benefits of CTDS and NTTP were increased by 0.4% and 6.2%, respectively. In conclusion, increasing panicles per unit area and thousand grain weight may be the feasible approach to achieve high yield for first season rice, and improving panicles per unit area, seed setting rate and thousand grain weight may be the feasible approach to achieve high yield for ratoon rice. Simplified cultivation technique has the advantages of saving cost, saving labor and high economic benefit, and has great development prospects in southeast Sichuan.

Cite this article

Peng JIANG, Hong ZHOU, Fuxian XU, Hong XIONG, Lin ZHANG, Yongchuan ZHU, Xingbing ZHOU, Xiaoyi GUO, Mao LIU . Analysis on Yield Components and Economic Efficiency of Ratoon Rice under Simplified Cultivation in Southeast Sichuan Province[J]. China Rice, 2021 , 27(1) : 80 -84 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.01.015

References

[1] 徐富贤,熊洪,张林,等. 再生稻产量形成特点与关键调控技术研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学,2015,48(9):1 702-1 717.
[2] 谢华安. 超级稻作再生稻高产栽培特性的研究[C]. 第1届中国杂交水稻大会论文集. 2010:17-26.
[3] 熊洪,冉茂林,徐富贤,等. 南方稻区再生稻研究及发展[J]. 作物学报,2000,35(5):389-393.
[4] CAI H F, CHEN Q G.Rice production in China in the early 21st century[J]. Rice Sci, 2000, 8(2): 14-16.
[5] PENG S B, TANG Q Y, ZOU Y B.Current status and challenges of rice production in China[J]. Plant Product Sci, 2009, 12: 3-8.
[6] 乐开富. 头季稻栽培因素对Ⅱ优1259再生稻产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米,2011,17(5):60-62.
[7] 饶鸣钿,施能浦,陈健康,等. 头季稻栽培因素对再生稻产量的影响[J]. 福建稻麦科技,1997,15(3):23-26.
[8] HUANG M, ZOU Y B, JIANG P, et al.Yield component differences between direct-seeded and transplanted super hybrid rice[J]. Plant Product Sci, 2010, 14(4): 331-338.
[9] 吴建富,潘晓华,石庆华. 免耕抛栽对水稻产量及其源库特性的影响[J]. 作物学报,2009,35(1):162-172.
[10] HUANG M, ZOU Y B, JIANG P, et al.Effect of tillage on soil and crop properties of wet-seeded flooded rice[J]. Field Crop Res, 2012, 129: 28-38.
[11] 徐富贤,熊洪,赵甘霖,等. 杂交中稻收割前再生芽死亡机理及其调节[J]. 中国农业科学,2000,33(4):31-37.
[12] 林文,李义珍,姜照伟,等. 再生稻根系形态和机能的品种间差异及与产量的关联性[J]. 福建稻麦科技,2001,19(4):9-11.
[13] 杨东,陈鸿飞,卓传营,等. 头季不同施氮方式对再生稻生理生化的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2009,17(4):643-646.
[14] DONG H L, CHEN Q, WANG W Q, et al.The growth and yield of a wet-seeded rice -ratoon rice system in central China[J]. Field Crop Res, 2017, 208: 55-59.
[15] 柳开楼,秦江涛,张斌. 播种期对轻简栽培方式再生稻源库关系的影响[J]. 土壤,2012,44(4):686-695.
[16] 李仁英,李霖,黄利东,等. 不同品种水稻的产量构成因素及其对氮磷吸收的差异研究[J]. 土壤通报,2016,47(12):1 418-1 424.
[17] 林祁,郑小萍,刘锋,等. 广两优676作再生稻高产栽培的产量结构特征分析[J]. 福建稻麦科技,2016,34(3):8-11.
[18] PENG S B, CASSMAN K G, VIRMANI S S, et al.Yield potential trends of tropical rice since release of IR8 and the challenge of increasing rice yield potential[J]. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1 552-1 559.
[19] 池忠志,姜心禄,郑家国. 不同种植方式对水稻产量的影响及其经济效益比较[J]. 作物杂志,2008(2):73-75.
[20] HUANG M, IBRAHIM M, XIA B, et al.Significance, progress and prospects for research in simplified cultivation technologies for rice in China[J]. J Agricult Sci, 2011, 149: 487-496.
[21] HUANG M, ZOU Y B, FENG Y H, et al.No-tillage and direct seeding for super hybrid rice production in rice-oilseed rape cropping system[J]. Eur J Agron, 2011, 34: 278-286.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.