Special Thesis & Basic Research

Effects of Total Straw Returning on Grain Yield and Quality under Different Soil Background

Expand
  • 1Institute of Rice Research, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Science, Shenyang 110161, China
    2Liaoning Agricultural Development Service Center, Shengyang 110034, China
    3Liaoning Vocational College, Tieling, Liaoning 112000, China

1st author: 252802294@qq.com

Received date: 2020-11-04

  Online published: 2021-03-20

Abstract

In order to clarify the effects of straw returning to the field on yield and quality of rice under different soil background, a pot experiment was conducted using japonica variety Liaogeng 2501 as material, the yield and quality performance of Liaogeng 2501 of different treatments (sandy loam, sandy loam + straw returning, saline-alkali soil, saline-alkali soil + straw returning, brown soil clay, brown soil clay + straw returning) under the condition of total applied pure nitrogen amount of 200 kg/hm2 was compared and analyzed. The results indicated that, compared with no straw returning, the yield of total straw-returning treatment increased by 4.45% in brown soil, however, the yield decreased significantly under sandy loam and saline-alkali soil with a decrease of 2.20% and 3.84%. The number of spikelets per panicle, especially the number of spikelets per secondary stalk was increased effectively with total straw returning under different soil backgrounds, but the number of effective panicles was decreased under saline-alkali soil and sandy loam. The total straw returning significantly increased the gel consistency and taste value of rice, but reduced the chalky grain rate and chalkiness degree of rice in the background of saline-alkali soil and sandy loam.

Cite this article

Wenxiao XIE, Jianguo LI, Jun LIU, Jun LU, Chuanbing LIANG, Hongru SHI, Mengshan LI . Effects of Total Straw Returning on Grain Yield and Quality under Different Soil Background[J]. China Rice, 2021 , 27(2) : 73 -76 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.02.015

References

[1] 高利伟,马林,张卫峰,等. 作物秸秆养分资源数量估算及其利用状况[J]. 农业工程学报,2009,25(7):173-179.
[2] 张明秋,王金武. 水稻秸秆还田研究现状[C]//中国农业工程学会2007年学术年会论文集. 北京:中国农业工程学会,2007.
[3] XU J, LI Z J, HAN H F, et al.Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carban, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system[J]. Field Crop Res, 2019, 23(3): 33-40.
[4] ZHAO X L, YUAN G Y, WANG G Y, et al.Effects of full straw incorporation on soil fertility and crop yield in rice-wheat rotation for silty clay loamy cropland[J]. Agronomy, 2019, 9(3): 133.
[5] JU J, CAI Y X, ZUO W G, et al.Effects of nitrogen management on soil nitrogen content and rice grain yield in double cropping rice production area with continuous full amount of straw returning[J]. Commun Soil Sci Plan, 2019, 50(20): 2 655-2 668.
[6] 胡雅杰,朱大伟,邢志鹏,等. 改进施氮运筹对水稻产量和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(1):12-22.
[7] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 第三版. 北京:中国农业出版社,2010:25-114.
[8] 朱兆良,文启孝. 中国土壤中的氮[M]. 南京:江苏科技出版社,1992:3-26.
[9] 孙华,钱国明,徐冬太,等. 水稻秸秆还田对水稻经济性状及产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米,2010,16(1):47-48.
[10] 孙扬,刘亚亮,肖薇航,等. 盐渍化水田秸秆还田对水稻生长及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志,2012(4):49-52.
[11] 邬石根,张洪良,龙光霞,等. 秸秆还田对酸性水稻土培肥增产效应分析[J]. 农业研究与应用,2016(3):20-25.
[12] 谢志煌,李彦生,于振华,等. 秸秆还田与作物氮素利用关系研究[J]. 土壤与作物,2016,5(4):261-268.
[13] 徐国伟. 种植方式、秸秆还田与实地氮肥管理对水稻产量与品质的影响及其生理的研究[D]. 扬州:扬州大学,2007.
[14] ZHANG L, WANG J, PANG H C, et al.Effects of pelletized straw on soil nutrient properties in relation to crop yield[J]. Soil Use Manage, 2018, 34(4): 479-489.
[15] 夏建国,邓良基,谭宏,等. 影响稻米品质的主要土壤生态因子研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报,2000,18(4):343-347.
[16] 戴平安,周坤炉,黎用朝,等. 土壤条件对优质食用稻品质及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学,1998,12(suppl1):51-57.
[17] 刘世平,聂新涛,张洪程,等. 稻麦两熟条件下不同土壤耕作方式与秸秆还田效用分析[J]. 农业工程学报,2006,22(7):48-51.
[18] 李欣,顾铭洪,潘学彪. 稻米品质研究Ⅱ. 灌浆期间环境条件对稻米品质的影响[J]. 江苏农学院学报,1989,10(1):7-12.
[19] 陈梦云,李晓峰,程金秋,等. 秸秆全量还田与氮肥运筹对机插优质食味水稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报,2017,43(12): 1 802-1 816.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.