Varieties & Technology

Study on the Dosage of Two Kinds of Controlled- Release Fertilizers for Rice in Northern Hubei Province

Expand
  • 1Resources and Environment College, Huazhong Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation for Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River/Microelement Research Center, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
    2Food Crops Research Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China
    3Agricultural Technology Extension Center of Zaoyang City, Zaoyang, Hubei 441200, China
    4Shuangshui Shuanglv Institute, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

Received date: 2021-08-10

  Online published: 2022-01-18

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of the two types of controlled-release fertilizers with different dosages on rice yield, yield components, nutrient absorption and fertilizer utilization in northern Hubei, aiming to provide scientific basis and guidance for the reasonable application of controlled-release fertilizers. The results showed that application of controlled-release fertilizer could significantly increase rice yield. Compared with the treatment without fertilization, application of the mixed coated slow-release fertilizer (MCSF) and humic acid slow-release fertilizer (HASF) increased rice yield by 6.6%~17.3% and 0.7%~11.9%, respectively. Compared with the conventional fertilization treatment, the yield of the MCSF and the HASF treatment increased by 8.4% and 2.5%, respectively. The increase of rice yield in fertilization treatments was mainly due to the increase of effective panicle number. In addition, the MCSF achieved higher yield increase rate than the HASF. The relationship between rice yield and the two kind of controlled-release fertilizer rate was linear-platform. Under the same fertilizer rate, the N, P2O5 and K2O uptake in above ground of the MCSF was significantly higher than that of the HASF. With the increase of fertilizer amount, the apparent recovery efficiency, physiological efficiency, agronomic efficiency and fertilizer contribution rate of the two controlled-release fertilizers increased at first and then decreased, the partial factor productivity of fertilizer decreased gradually. Considering the yield and fertilizer use efficiency, we recommend that the mixed coated slow-release fertilizer should be preferred in the rice production in northern Hubei. The appropriate application amount was 450 kg/hm2, and the rice yield reached 11 420 kg/hm2.

Cite this article

HE Shuai, WANG Benfu, CHEN Bin, CHEN Chao, ZHAO Yongping, LI Xiaokun . Study on the Dosage of Two Kinds of Controlled- Release Fertilizers for Rice in Northern Hubei Province[J]. China Rice, 2022 , 28(1) : 103 -108 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2022.01.021

References

[1] 湖北省统计局. 农村统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1990—2003.
[2] 韩宝吉. 湖北省中稻最佳养分管理技术研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2011.
[3] 郭志奇. 我国水稻栽培现状、高产栽培技术及展望[J]. 南方农业, 2014, 8(21):92-93.
[4] 张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):915-924.
[5] 王伟妮, 鲁剑巍, 陈防, 等. 湖北省水稻施肥效果及肥料利用效率现状研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(2):289-295.
[6] 韩宝吉, 石磊, 徐芳森, 等. 湖北省水稻施肥现状分析及评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2012, 51(12):2 430-2 435.
[7] 汪强, 李双凌, 韩燕来, 等. 缓/控释肥对小麦增产与提高氮肥利用率的效果研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2007(4):693-696.
[8] 纪雄辉, 罗兰芳, 郑圣先. 控释肥料对提高水稻养分利用率和削减稻田土壤环境污染的作用[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2007, 22(2):67-68.
[9] 邓先亮, 屠晓, 李军, 等. 缓控释肥一次性基施对小麦产量及其形成的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(3):87-93.
[10] 刘兆辉, 吴小宾, 谭德水, 等. 一次性施肥在我国主要粮食作物中的应用与环境效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(20):3 827-3 839.
[11] 魏海燕, 李宏亮, 程金秋, 等. 缓释肥类型与运筹对不同穗型水稻产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(5):730-740.
[12] 张夫道, 王玉军. 我国缓/控释肥料的现状和发展方向[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2008(4):1-4.
[13] 徐冰, 邰日晶, 尹同波, 等. 活性腐殖酸复合肥对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2009(3):16-19.
[14] DENG F, WANG L, REN W J, et al. Optimized nitrogen managements and polyaspartic acid urea improved dry matter production and yield of indica hybrid rice[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2015, 145:1-9.
[15] 胡丹丹, 范呈根, 洪欠欠, 等. 等养分条件下缓/控释肥料替代部分速效化肥对中稻生产效益的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2018, 24(1):16-19.
[16] 林磊, 邓亮, 卢碧林. 水稻专用肥施用方式对杂交稻产量和生理的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2016, 43(1):5-10.
[17] 程金秋, 朱盈, 魏海燕, 等. 缓控释肥料在水稻上的应用效果综述[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(17):11-15.
[18] WANG S Q, ZHAO X, XING G X, et al. Improving grain yield and reducing N loss using polymer-coated urea in southeast China[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2015, 35(3):1103-15.
[19] 宇万太, 赵鑫, 张璐, 等. 长期施肥对作物产量的贡献[J]. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(12):2 040-2 044.
[20] 吴萍萍, 刘金剑, 周毅, 等. 长期不同施肥制度对红壤稻田肥料利用率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(2):277-283.
[21] 于飞, 施卫明. 近10年中国大陆主要粮食作物氮肥利用率分析[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(6):1 311-1 324.
[22] 叶全宝, 张洪程, 魏海燕, 等. 不同土壤及氮肥条件下水稻氮利用效率和增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(11):38-44.
[23] 刘润梅, 范茂攀, 付云章, 等. 云南省马铃薯施肥量与化肥偏生产力的关系研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2014, 51(4):753-760.
[24] 张福锁, 张卫锋, 陈新平. 对我国肥料利用率的分析[M]//第二届全国测土配方施肥技术研讨会论文集. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2007.
[25] 牛育华, 李媛, 龙学莉, 等. 腐殖酸肥料在农业生产中的应用及研究进展[J]. 化肥工业, 2016, 43(5):9-12.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.