Special Thesis & Basic R esearch

Effects of Different Nitrogen Amounts on Rice Yield and Field Water Quality in Rice-crayfish Co-culture System

Expand
  • 1College of Agriculture, Yangtze University/Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wet land, Ministry of Education, Jingzhou, Hubei 434025, China
    2College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
    3Xiantao Agricultural Technology Promotion Center, Xiantao, Hubei 433000, China
    4China Farm (Wuhan) Good-seed Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430070, China
    5College of Life Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei 434025, China

Received date: 2021-11-11

  Online published: 2022-03-17

Abstract

To provide a theoretical basis to use appropriate nitrogen (N) amount for accurate fertilization in the rice-crayfish co-culture system, the effects of different nitrogen amounts on rice yield and surface water quality were studied. Five N application rates were set at N 0, 60, 120, 180 and 240 kg/hm2 based the same ratio of basal fertilizer to tillering fertilizer (7∶3), which was represented by CK, N60, N120, N180 and N240, respectively. The results showed that fertilization could maintain a higher inorganic N content in the soil and promote dry matter accumulation in rice. The fertilization treatments increased rice yield by 8%~42%, of which N120 obtained the highest yields, which is 42% higher than CK. After nitrogen application, the ammonia N content in the surface water increased rapidly at the first 3 days and then decreased. After 14 days, it dropped to the lowest and became stable. Among them, the ammonia N concentration of different treatments within 5 days after nitrogen application was significantly different, and the value increased as the nitrogen fertilizer amount increased. The nitrite N concentration in surface water increased at first 6 days, then decreased and then increased. The difference between the fertilization treatments on the 3rd day was significant, and the difference between the treatments after the 7th day was not significant. Different nitrogen application amounts affected the pH of the surface water. The pH fluctuation of each treatment within 14 days after fertilization was between 6.57 and 8.22, but the difference between the treatments was not significant after 14 days. The appropriate amount of nitrogen application promotes the increase of rice yield, but also reduces the content of ammonia N and nitrite N in the field surface water, maintaining a good living environment for crayfish, and 120~130 kg/hm2 can be used as the recommended nitrogen application rate for rice-shrimp co-cropping system.

Cite this article

HUANG Fei, NIE Xibin, YANG Shuo, DING Zijuan, LI Jintao, GAO Hongjian, YE Xinxin, GE Yonghu, MEI Jun, CAO Yuxian, HOU Jun . Effects of Different Nitrogen Amounts on Rice Yield and Field Water Quality in Rice-crayfish Co-culture System[J]. China Rice, 2022 , 28(2) : 51 -55 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2022.02.010

References

[1] 佀国涵, 彭成林, 徐祥玉, 等. 稻-虾共作模式对涝渍稻田土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(1):61-68.
[2] HOU J, STYLES D, CAO Y X, et al. The sustainability of rice-crayfish coculture systems: a mini review of evidence from Jianghan plain in China[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2020, DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.11019.
[3] HOU J, ZHANG D Y, ZHU J Q. Nutrient accumulation from excessive nutrient surplus caused by shifting from rice monoculture to rice-crayfish rotation[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116367.
[4] 曹凑贵, 江洋, 汪金平, 等. 稻虾共作模式的“双刃性”及可持续发展策略[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(9):1 245-1 253.
[5] 刘军, 谢祥林, 严维辉, 等. 克氏原螯虾稻田高效生态养殖试验总结[J]. 水产养殖, 2011, 32(5):37-38.
[6] HOU J, WANG X, WANG X L, et al. Rice-crayfish systems are not a panacea for sustaining cleaner food production[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, doi:. org/10.1007/s11356-021-12345-7.
[7] 程慧俊. 克氏原螯虾稻田养殖生态学的初步研究[D]. 武汉:湖北大学, 2014: 10-15.
[8] 佀国涵, 彭成林, 徐祥玉, 等. 稻-虾共作模式对涝渍稻田土壤微生物群落多样性及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(3):503-509.
[9] HU L L, ZHANG J, REN W Z, et al. Can the co-cultivation of rice and fish help sustain rice production?[J]. Scientific Reports. 2016, 6:28 728.
[10] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000: 22-36.
[11] 郑盛华, 陈红琳, 朱孟琦, 等. 水稻产量对川西平原基础肥力和施肥的响应[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2018, 23(12):13-20.
[12] 李月梅. 稻田养鱼生态效益[J]. 农业系统科学与综合研究, 1999(1):54-56.
[13] 胡亮亮. 农业生物种间互惠的生态系统功能[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2014.
[14] 彭成林, 袁家富, 贾平安, 等. 长期稻虾共作模式对不同施氮量下直播水稻产量和氮肥利用效率的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(4):15-21.
[15] 王关林, 苏章锋, 刘东, 等. 虾稻共作土壤养分空间变异及中稻施肥技术研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2017(2):160-162.
[16] 罗静波, 曹志华, 蔡太锐, 等. 氨氮对克氏原螯虾幼虾的急性毒性研究[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 3(4):183-185.
[17] 张勇, 马旭洲, 王昂. 施肥对幼蟹池塘养殖水质影响的初步探究[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2018, 27(6):884-893.
[18] 黄翔鹄, 李长玲, 郑莲, 等. 亚硝酸盐氮对凡纳滨对虾毒性和抗病相关因子影响[J]. 水生生物学报, 2006(4):466-471.
[19] 程建平, 文玲梅, 杨涛, 等. 增施微生物营养料对稻虾共作养殖水体水质及小龙虾产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(23):121-123.
[20] 刘卿君. 秸秆还田与投食对稻虾共作水质的影响[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2017.
[21] 刘才高, 周爱珠, 徐刚勇. 稻鳖共生效益试验[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(7):157.
[22] 周江伟, 黄璜, 刘贵斌, 等. 免耕稻鳖鱼螺生态种养模式发展前景探讨[J]. 作物研究, 2016, 30(6):661-665.
[23] YUE C F, WANG TT, WANG Y F, et al. Effect of combined photoperiod, water calcium concentration and pH on survival, growth, and moulting of juvenile crayfish (Procam barus clarkii) cultured under laboratory conditions[J]. Aquaculture Research, 2009, 40(11):1 243-1 250.
[24] 李成芳, 曹凑贵, 汪金平, 等. 稻鸭、稻鱼共作生态系统中稻田田面水的N素动态变化及淋溶损失[J]. 环境科学学报, 2008(10):2 125-2 132.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.