Special Thesis & Basic Research

Effects of Straw Fast-rot Agent on Rice Yield and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties

Expand
  • Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology/Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Agricultural College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China

Received date: 2021-11-13

  Online published: 2022-05-24

Abstract

An experiment was set up to study the effects of five different dosages of straw fast-rot agent treatments (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 g/pot) on rice yield, straw decomposition and soil physicochemical properties under the condition of straw returning field. The results showed that the amount of straw decomposed increased with the increase of the amount of fast-rot agent, and the straw decomposition rate was the largest in the treatment of 0.4 g/pot, which was 13.0%-18.0% higher than that of the treatment without fast-rot agent. Compared with the treatment without fast-rot agent, the yield of the treatment with fast-rot agent was significantly increased by 1.3%-11.1%, and the treatment with 0.2 g/pot performed the best. The yield increased due to higher grains number per panicle and seed setting rate. The application of fast-rot agent could promote the accumulation of dry matter in rice, and the nitrogen accumulation of rice plants at the mature stage increased significantly compared with the treatment without fast-rot agent, and the highest increase was in the treatment of 0.2 g/pot. The application of fast-rot agent could help rice absorb and utilize soil organic matter, total nitrogen content and available nutrients, and improved the level of soil fertilizer supply. The results of this study have reference significance for the efficient utilization of straw resources.

Cite this article

HAN Lijun, XIE Hao, XUE Zhangyi, YAN Guanyutong, GU Junfei . Effects of Straw Fast-rot Agent on Rice Yield and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties[J]. China Rice, 2022 , 28(3) : 20 -25 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2022.03.004

References

[1] 安成立, 杜建, 岳秀琴, 等. 作物秸秆高效综合利用途径探析[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2004(1):25-27.
[2] 高利伟, 马林, 张卫峰, 等. 中国作物秸秆养分资源数量估算及其利用状况[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(7): 173-179.
[3] 陈中玉, 张祖立, 白小虎. 农作物秸秆的综合开发利用[J]. 农机化研究, 2007, 63(5):194-196.
[4] 高祥照, 马文奇, 马常宝, 等. 中国作物秸秆资源利用现状分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2002, 21(3):242-247.
[5] 杨帆, 李荣, 崔勇, 等. 我国有机肥料资源利用现状与发展建议[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2010(4):77-82.
[6] 王海候, 沈明星, 陆长婴, 等. 不同秸秆还田模式对稻麦两熟农田稻季甲烷和氧化亚氮排放的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2014, 30(4):758-763.
[7] 韩梦颖, 王雨桐, 高丽, 等. 降解秸秆微生物及秸秆腐熟剂的研究进展[J]. 南方农业学报, 2017, 48(6): 1024-1030 .
[8] 王世林, 张振华, 朱玉君, 等. 水稻成花素基因RFT1对抽穗期的促进作用[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26 (3):18-22.
[9] 许阳东, 朱宽宇, 章星传, 等. 绿色超级稻品种的农艺与生状分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(1):70-80.
[10] PAGE A L, MILLER R H, DENNIS R K. Methods of Soil Analysis[M]. American Society of Agronomy: Science Society of America, 1982.
[11] 章骏德, 刘国异, 施永宁. 植物生理学实验法[M]. 南昌: 江西人民出版社, 1982:26-29.
[12] BREMNER J M, JENKINSON D S. Determination of organic carbon in soil: II. Effect of carbonized materials[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 1960, 11(2): 403-408.
[13] 宋智勇. 水稻微核心种质资源N、P利用效率的筛选与评价[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2011.
[14] GANDER L K, HENDRICKS C W, DOYLE J D. Interferences, limitations, and an improvement in the extraction and assessment of cellulase activity in soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1994, 26(1): 65-73.
[15] YU D, BOUGHTON B A, HILL C B, et al. Insights into oxidized lipid modification in barley roots as an adaptation mechanism to salinity stress[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11: 1.
[16] 洪春来, 魏幼璋, 黄锦法, 等. 秸秆全量直接还田对土壤肥力及农田生态环境的影响研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2003, 29(6):40-46.
[17] 叶文培, 谢小立, 王凯荣, 等. 不同时期秸秆还田对水稻生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2008, 22 (1):65-70.
[18] 张媛媛, 李建林, 王春宏, 等. 氮素和生物腐解剂调控下稻草还田对水稻氮素积累及产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2012, 43(2):435-438.
[19] 于宗波, 杨恒山, 萨如拉. 不同质地土壤玉米秸秆还田配施腐熟剂效应的研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(4):234-240.
[20] 萨如拉, 杨恒山, 范富, 等. 秸秆还田量和腐熟剂对秸秆降解率和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2018, 47(9):56-61.
[21] 赵勇, 李武, 周志华, 等. 秸秆还田后土壤微生物群落结构变化的初步研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2005, 24(6): 1114-1118.
[22] 张伟, 龚久平, 刘建国. 秸秆还田对连作棉田土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(5):881-885.
[23] 李春阳. 不同秸秆还田量对土壤性状及玉米产量的影响[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2017.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.