Special Thesis & Basic Research

Analysis of Bacterial Community Structure and Function in Rice Rhizosphere Soil at Different Growth Stages in Rice-crab co Cropping Paddy Field

Expand
  • Liaodong University, Dandong, Liaoning 118003, China

Received date: 2021-12-12

  Online published: 2022-07-21

Abstract

In order to study the community structure and function of rhizosphere soil bacteria in rice-crab co cropping paddy field at different growth stages, high-throughput sequencing and analysis of rhizosphere soil bacteria at tillering stage, jointing stage, heading stage and maturity stage were carried out by using Illumina platform miseq high-throughput sequencing technology. The results showed that a total of 6 637 OTUs could be divided into 54 pHyla, 171 classes, 381 orders, 600 families, 1 028 genera and 2 162 species. The number of bacteria OTUs shared by different growth stages was 3 122. Among the four growth stages, the Chao1 index at the heading stage was the highest, and there was no significant difference in Shannon index. PCA analysis showed that bacterial communities at the jointing stage and heading stage were similar, but different with those from tillering stage and maturity stage. There were 31 dominant bacterial genera (relative abundance>1%) in the rhizosphere soil of paddy field in the four growth stages, and the dominant bacterial phyla(relative abundance>10%) were Chloroflexi, Actinobacteriota, Proteobacteria and Acidobacteriota. PICRUSt analysis showed that the abundance of 269 metabolic pathways was the highest at the heading stage. The results showed that the bacterial community structure and function of rhizosphere soil would change with the growth period of rice, and the number of bacterial species at the heading stage was the largest and the metabolic function was the strongest.

Cite this article

XU Zhongwei, LIU Chunyue, SHI Jiayue, SHAO Xia, SONG Yu . Analysis of Bacterial Community Structure and Function in Rice Rhizosphere Soil at Different Growth Stages in Rice-crab co Cropping Paddy Field[J]. China Rice, 2022 , 28(4) : 61 -66 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2022.04.013

References

[1] NOAH F. Embracing the unkown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2017, 15: 579-590.
[2] LAURENT P, JOS M.R, PHILIPPE L, et al. Going back to the roots:the microbial ecology of the rhizospHere[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2013, 11: 789-799.
[3] EDWARDS J, JOHNSON C, SANTOS-MEDELLIN C, et al. Structure, variation and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2015, 112(8): 911-920.
[4] TILMAN D, CASSMAN K G, MATSON P A, et al. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices[J]. Nature, 2002, 418(6898): 671-677.
[5] BROMLEY D W. Food security: Beyond technology[J]. Science, 2010, 328(5 975): 169.
[6] 丁伟华, 李娜娜, 任伟征, 等. 传统稻鱼系统生产力提升对稻田水体环境的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(3):308-314.
[7] 肖求清. 稻虾共作对稻田生物多样性的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2017.
[8] 张剑, 胡亮亮, 任伟征, 等. 稻鱼系统中田鱼对资源的利用及对水稻生长的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(1):299-307.
[9] 罗衡, 赵良杰, 李丰, 等. 养殖鳖的引入对稻田土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 水产学报, 2018, 42(5):720-731.
[10] 宋宇, 王鹏, 韦月平. 不同稻田共作模式对土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2020, 29(2):216-223.
[11] 宋宇, 王鹏, 韦月平. 不同共作模式的稻田土壤细菌群落结构分析[J]. 东北农业科学, 2019, 44(4):46-49.
[12] 宋宇, 王鹏, 韦月平. 不同稻田栽培模式下土壤细菌群落多样性分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(2):263-267.
[13] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000:11-17.
[14] ANTHONY M B, MARC L, BJOERN U. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data[J]. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30(15): 2 114-2 120.
[15] DEEPAK R, SHENGDAR Q T, CYD K, et al. FLASH assembly of TALENs for high-throughput genome editing[J]. Nature Biotechnol ogy, 2012, 30(5): 460-465.
[16] JGREGORY C, JUSTIN K, JESSE S, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data[J]. Nature Methods, 2010, 7(5): 335-336.
[17] ROBERT C E, BRIAN J H, JOSE C C, et al. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection[J]. Bioinformatics, 2011, 27(16): 2 194-2 200.
[18] STEPHANE U, MARCC B, CLAUDE M, et al. Pyrosequencingreveals a contrasted bacterial diversity between oak rhizosphere and surrounding soil[J]. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 2010(2): 281-288.
[19] LI X Z, RUI J P, MAO Y J, et al. Dynamics of the bacterial community structure in the rhizosphere of a maize cultivar[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2014, 68: 392-401.
[20] ANNE C. Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 1984, 11(4): 265-270.
[21] 杨珍, 戴传超, 王兴祥, 等. 作物土传真菌病害发生的根际微生物机制研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(1):12-22.
[22] BRAJESH K S, LORNA A D, CATRIONA A M, et al. Impact of biotic and abiotic interaction on soil microbial communities and functions: A field study[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2009, 41(3): 239-248.
[23] 周艳飞, 聂江文, 王幼娟, 等. 施氮水平对稻-稻-紫云英稻田土壤细菌数量及群落结构的影响[J]. 农业环境与发展, 2018, 35(6):508-517.
[24] 吴晶. 氮肥施用量及种类对高产稻田土壤理化性质和细菌群落结构的影响[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2019.
[25] 王宁, 罗佳琳, 赵亚慧, 等. 不同麦秸还田模式对稻田土壤微生物活性和微生物群落组成的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(1):125-133.
[26] 袁红朝, 吴昊, 葛体达, 等. 长期施肥对稻田土壤细菌、古菌多样性和群落结构的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(6):1 807- 1 813.
[27] ROMINA R, LIDIA G, ALEJANDRO C, et al. Assessment of soil microbial diversity measurements as indicators of soil functioning in organic and conventional horticulture systems[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2011, 11(5): 1 345-1 353.
[28] 鲜文东, 张潇橦, 李文均. 绿弯菌的研究现状及展望[J]. 微生物学报, 2020, 60(9):1 801-1 820.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.