
Effects of Different Duck Density and Planting Density on Dry Matter Accumulation, Translocation and Yield of Organic Cultivation Rice
Received date: 2021-12-25
Online published: 2022-07-21
In order to ascertain the effects of different duck density and planting density on dry matter production characteristics of organic cultivation rice, a two-factor split plot design experiment was carried out with Yixiangyou 2115 as the material in Sansui County in 2020, in which duck density was the main plot factor and planting density was the sub plot factor. The results showed that the leaf area index of rice at booting and heading stage increased first and then decreased with the increase of duck density, and the highest value was found at 450 ducks/hm2. At the same time, stoching duck increased dry matter accumulation in early and late growth period of rice, but reduced dry matter accumulation in middle growth period. Compared with the treatment without duck, the spikelet number per panicle was significantly improved in the treatment with duck. The yield of rice increased first and then decreased with the increase of duck density. High planting density increased the highest tiller number, leaf area index, dry matter accumulation and translocation at different growth stages, and significantly increased yield. The highest yield was 7 131.12 kg/hm2 when the stocking density was 634 ducks/hm2 and the planting density was 191 000 clumps/hm2.
Key words: rice; organic cultivation; duck density; planting density; dry matter accumulation; yield
LU Wei, ZHOU Xuan, XU Guiling, FENG Yuehua, LUO Qiangxin, LI Jie, HAN Zhili, WANG Xiaoke, PENG Jin feng . Effects of Different Duck Density and Planting Density on Dry Matter Accumulation, Translocation and Yield of Organic Cultivation Rice[J]. China Rice, 2022 , 28(4) : 67 -73 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2022.04.014
| [1] | 王兴龙, 史纪锁. 有机稻米产业发展中存在的问题与对策浅析[J]. 中国稻米, 2005, 11(6):47-48. |
| [2] | 刘欣, 王强盛, 许国春, 等. 稻鸭共作农作系统的生态效应与技术模式[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(29):90-96. |
| [3] | 王成豹, 马成武, 陈海星. 稻鸭共作生产有机稻的效果[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2003, 44(4):42-44. |
| [4] | 杨静, 高亮, 朱毅. 稻鸭共作研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(3):1-6. |
| [5] | 李军, 郑文江, 宋珊珊, 等. 役鸭放养密度对有机水稻生产经济效益的影响[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2012, 35(7):4-5. |
| [6] | 杨震道, 刘根红. 有机水稻合理种植密度研究[J]. 农业科学研究, 2020, 41(2):1-6. |
| [7] | 罗强鑫, 冯跃华, 许桂玲, 等. 有机肥施用量和种植密度对有机栽培水稻生长及产量的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2021, 35(2):102-107. |
| [8] | 禹盛苗, 欧阳由男, 张秋英, 等. 稻鸭共育复合系统对水稻生长与产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(7):1 252-1 256. |
| [9] | 张锦, 章家恩, 秦钟, 等. 稻鸭共作对水稻部分株型结构指标的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(1):1-6. |
| [10] | 仲子忠, 张荔, 丁桂珍. 不同密度与生物肥用量对水稻生产的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2010(8):56-67. |
| [11] | 秦炎, 秦亚平. 种植密度对水稻群体质量和产量形成的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(12):2 222-2 225. |
| [12] | 李静. 2种生态条件下栽培密度对水稻干物质积累与转运的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29(7):1 559-1 565. |
| [13] | 禹盛苗, 金千瑜, 朱练峰, 等. 稻田养鸭密度对水稻产量和经济效益的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2008, 49(1):68-71. |
| [14] | 卞国宝, 熊国远. 稻鸭共生中鸭的放养密度及作用效果研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2010, 31(3):134-135. |
| [15] | EDAR E, YABUKI R, TAKAYAMA K, et al. Comparative studies on reproductive ability of ducks (Mallard, Cherry Valley and Their Crossbred)[J]. Japanese Poultry Science, 1996, 33(5): 321-327. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |