
Effects of Nitrogen Management on Yield and Lodging Resistance of Rice under Rice-crayfish Coculture
Received date: 2022-06-04
Online published: 2022-11-17
The effects of nitrogen management on rice yield and lodging resistance characteristics of rice in the rice-crayfish coculture were studied, by two interactive experiments of different rice cropping modes (rice monocropping, rice-crayfish coculture) and nitrogen fertilizer management (no nitrogen application, conventional nitrogen application, and nitrogen-reduction application). The results showed that, the rice yields of the conventional nitrogen application treatment and nitrogen reduction treatment under rice-crayfish coculture were 7 539 kg/hm2 and 7 328 kg/hm2, respectively, which were 29.4%-32.3% lower than those of the rice monocropping. It was mainly caused by the continuous rainfall after rice transplanting in the experiment year, and also related to the decrease in the number of effective panicles, grains per panicle and 1000-grain weight of rice under deep-water flooding. Compared with rice monoculture, the plant height, panicle length, the gravity center height, the bending moment and lodging index of the rice-crayfish coculture increased by 12.9%, 17.9%, 8.0%, 20.9% and 33.5% on average, the thickness of culm wall, breaking resistance, and breaking moment of the second internode decreased by 38.7%, 16.8% and 16.6% on average. In the rice-crayfish coculture mode, compared with the conventional nitrogen application treatment, the breaking resistance of the second internode of the rice stem in the nitrogen reduction treatment increased by 13.5%, and the lodging index decreased by 1.8%, rice yield reduced only 2.9%. Correlation analysis showed that the stem wall thickness was extremely significantly negatively correlated with lodging index (p<0.01), and the plant height and bending moment were significantly negatively correlated with breaking resistance (p<0.05). The rice-crayfish coculture can ensure stable rice yield, reducing application amount of nitrogen fertilizer can improve the lodging resistance under this mode and reduce the lodging risk.
XU Qiang, LI Jingyong, DAI Linxiu, PENG Xiang, YANG Qian, DOU Zhi, GAO Hui . Effects of Nitrogen Management on Yield and Lodging Resistance of Rice under Rice-crayfish Coculture[J]. China Rice, 2022 , 28(6) : 30 -36 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2022.06.007
| [1] | 高辉, 陈友明. 稻田高质高效生态种养200题[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2021. |
| [2] | 唐建军, 李巍, 吕修涛, 等. 中国稻渔综合种养产业的发展现状与若干思考[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(5):1-10. |
| [3] | 全国水产技术推广总站, 中国水产学会. 2020中国小龙虾产业发展报告[J]. 中国水产, 2020(7):8-17. |
| [4] | GUO L, ZHAO L, YE J, et al. Using aquatic animals as partners to increase yield and maintain soil nitrogen in the paddy ecosystems[J]. eLife, 2022, doi: 10.7554/eLife.73869. |
| [5] | 佀国涵, 彭成林, 徐祥玉, 等. 稻虾共作模式对涝渍稻田土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(1):61-68. |
| [6] | 陈松文, 刘天奇, 曹凑贵, 等. 水稻生产碳中和现状及低碳稻作技术策略[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2021, 40(3):3-12. |
| [7] | HOU J, STYLES D, CAO Y, et al. The sustainability of rice-crayfish coculture systems: A mini review of evidence from Jianghan plain in China[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2021, 101(9): 3 843-3 853. |
| [8] | XU Q, LIU T, GUO H L, et al. Conversion from rice-wheat rotation to rice-crayfish coculture increases net ecosystem service values in Hung-tse Lake area, east China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128883. |
| [9] | 王强盛, 甄若宏, 丁艳锋, 等. 稻鸭共作下水稻植株的壮秆效应及生理特性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(12):2661-2 665. |
| [10] | 孟祥杰, 梁玉刚, 邹紫茵, 等. 稻鸭共育下施用生物炭对水稻茎秆及倒伏性状的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(10):3125-3 134. |
| [11] | 吴晓然, 张巫军, 伍龙梅, 等. 超级杂交籼稻抗倒能力比较及其对氮素的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(14):2705-2 717. |
| [12] | 蒋明金, 王海月, 何艳, 等. 氮肥管理对直播杂交水稻抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(1):157-168. |
| [13] | 李国辉, 钟旭华, 田卡, 等. 施氮对水稻茎秆抗倒伏能力的影响及其形态和力学机理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(7):1323-1 334. |
| [14] | HU L L, ZHANG J, REN W Z, et al. Can the co-cultivation of rice and fish help sustain rice production?[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, doi: 10.1038/srep28728. |
| [15] | 孙文通, 张庆阳, 马旭洲, 等. 不同河蟹放养密度对养蟹稻田水环境及水稻产量影响的研究[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2014, 23(3):366-373. |
| [16] | 谷婕, 吴涛, 王忍, 等. 稻鱼生态系统对水稻产量及其构成因素的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2019, 33(5):378-381. |
| [17] | 梁玉刚, 黄璜, 李静怡, 等. 规模化稻鸭共育对水稻株型结构及产量形成的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(10):2752-2 758. |
| [18] | 姚义, 温凯, 杨武广, 等. 稻作方式对优质食味品种南粳9108的产量、品质及效益的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(2):69-72. |
| [19] | 车阳, 程爽, 田晋钰, 等. 不同稻田综合种养模式下水稻产量形成特点及其稻米品质和经济效益差异[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10):1953-1 965. |
| [20] | 王振昌, 郭相平, 杨静晗, 等. 旱涝交替胁迫对水稻干物质生产分配及倒伏性状的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(24):114-123. |
| [21] | 彭世彰, 张正良, 庞桂斌. 控制灌溉条件下寒区水稻茎秆抗倒伏力学评价及成因分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(1):6-10. |
| [22] | 郭相平, 黄双双, 王振昌, 等. 不同灌溉模式对水稻抗倒伏能力影响的试验研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2017, 36(5):1-5. |
| [23] | HIRANO T, KOSHIMURA H, UCHIDA N, et al. Growth and distribution of photoassimilates in floating rice under submergence[J]. Japanese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 1995, 3(39): 177-183. |
| [24] | 陈林荣, 李阳阳, 郭哈伦, 等. 深水灌溉对稻渔共生水稻抗倒伏性的影响研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(5):102-104. |
| [25] | 王丹, 刘元英, 彭显龙, 等. 肥水优化管理对寒地水稻抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2012, 26(2):352-357. |
| [26] | 佀国涵, 袁家富, 彭成林, 等. 稻虾共作模式氮和磷循环特征及平衡状况[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(9):1309-1 318. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |