Special Thesis & Basic Research

Effects of In Situ Passivation on Remediation Effect and Soil Enzyme Activity of Cadmium Contaminated Soil in Paddy Field

Expand
  • 1. College of Environmental Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225127, China
    2. Jiangsu Organic Solid Waste Resources Collaborative Innovation Center, Nanjing 210095, China
2859692705@qq.com

Received date: 2022-09-18

  Online published: 2023-03-14

Abstract

The effects of four passivators, including sepiolite, lime, iron-modified woody peat and weakly alkaline bio-organic fertilizer, on in situ remediation of cadmium (Cd)-contaminated paddy soil and soil enzyme activities were studied. The results showed that the four passivators could improve soil pH and rice yield, reduce Cd bioavailability in soil and Cd content in brown rice, and the Cd content in brown rice was lower than the national food safety standard limit (Cd≤0.2 mg/kg). The treatment of applying 1 500 kg/hm2 weakly alkaline bio-organic fertilizer had the best effect on increasing soil pH, from 6.07 to 7.00, an increase of 13.2%. The treatment with 2 500 kg/hm2 iron-modified woody peat had the largest decrease in soil available Cd and brown rice Cd content, from 0.538 mg/kg to 0.232 mg/kg and 0.260 mg/kg to 0.076 mg/kg, respectively, with a decrease of 56.8% and 70.8%. The treatment of 1 500 kg/hm2 weak alkaline bio-organic fertilizer had the best effect of increasing rice yield, with an increase of 6.4%. The activities of invertase, urease and catalase in soil were increased to varying degrees after the application of the four passivators. Among them, the treatment of applying 1 200 kg/hm2 of quicklime had the best effect on improving the activity of invertase in soil, the treatment of applying 2 500 kg/hm2 of iron-modified woody peat had the most obvious effect of improving the activity of urease in soil, the treatment of 1 500 kg/hm2 weak alkaline bio-organic fertilizer had the best effect on improving the activity of catalase in soil. Correlation analysis showed that the Cd content in brown rice was negatively correlated with the activities of soil invertase, urease and catalase, indicating that the application of these four passivators could reduce the Cd content in brown rice. Based on the effects of four passivators on soil available Cd, Cd content in brown rice and soil enzyme activity, iron-modified woody peat is more suitable for remediation of cadmium-contaminated soil.

Cite this article

CHENG Tong, WANG Xiaobing, DONG Junneng, CHEN Yue, WANG Haichao, FU Kuankuan . Effects of In Situ Passivation on Remediation Effect and Soil Enzyme Activity of Cadmium Contaminated Soil in Paddy Field[J]. China Rice, 2023 , 29(2) : 28 -33 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.02.006

References

[1] 康宏宇, 林健, 张乃明, 等. 不同钝化材料对重金属污染土壤的钝化效果研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(35):176-180.
[2] 谢超然, 王兆炜, 朱俊民, 等. 核桃青皮生物炭对重金属铅、铜的吸附特性研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(4):1190-1 198.
[3] 徐东星, 周怀东, 高博. 生物炭吸附重金属污染物的研究进展[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报, 2016, 14(1):7-15.
[4] 张迪, 吴晓霞, 丁爱芳, 等. 生物炭和熟石灰对土壤镉铅生物有效性和微生物活性的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2019, 38(11):2526-2 534.
[5] 李芹, 张曼, 张锡洲, 等. 水稻镉安全材料分蘖期根部镉积累分布特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(3):443-452.
[6] 刘君, 张猛, 张士荣, 等. 山东省水稻产地土壤重金属污染风险评价[J]. 青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 36(2):112-118.
[7] 陈思慧, 张亚平, 李飞, 等. 钝化剂联合农艺措施修复镉污染水稻土[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019, 38(3):563-572.
[8] 袁兴超, 李博, 朱仁凤, 等. 不同钝化剂对铅锌矿区周边农田镉铅污染钝化修复研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019, 38(4):807-817.
[9] 周影, 赵荷娟, 管永祥, 等. 生物有机肥对丘陵地区补充耕地水稻产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2017, 23(8):98-101.
[10] 方克明, 肖欣, 王美玲, 等. 农用石灰在酸性及镉污染稻田中试效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(26):93-97.
[11] 张迪, 李婷, 方炫, 等. 钝化剂对土壤镉铅有效性和微生物群落多样性影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019, 38(12):2729-2 737.
[12] 王理德, 王方琳, 郭春秀, 等. 土壤酶学研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(1):12-21.
[13] 曹慧, 孙辉, 杨浩, 等. 土壤酶活性及其对土壤质量的指示研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2003, 9(1):105-109.
[14] 孟庆峰, 杨劲松, 姚荣江, 等. 单一及复合重金属污染对土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(3):545-550.
[15] 陈承利. 重金属Cd、Pb、Hg污染对土壤微生物及其活性影响研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2006.
[16] 李力, 刘娅, 陆宇超, 等. 生物炭的环境效应及其应用的研究进展[J]. 环境化学, 2011, 30(8):1411-1 421.
[17] CASTALDI S, RIONDINO M, BARONTIS F, et al. Impact of biochar application to a Mediterranean wheat crop on soil microbial activitynd greenhouse gas fluxes[J]. Chemosphere, 2011, 85(9): 235-251.
[18] 李发生, 韩梅, 熊代群, 等. 不同浸提剂对几种典型土壤中重金属有效态的浸提效率研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2003, 22(6):704-706.
[19] 吴迪, 魏小娜, 彭湃, 等. 钝化剂对酸性高镉土壤钝化效果及水稻镉吸收的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2019, 50(2):482-488.
[20] 李江遐, 吴林春, 张军, 等. 生物炭修复土壤重金属污染的研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2015, 24(12):2075-2 081.
[21] 张金柱, 郭春景, 张兴, 等. 生物有机肥对中度盐碱土理化性质影响的研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2008, 47(12):1420-1 422.
[22] 王学锋, 尚菲, 马鑫, 等. pH和腐植酸对Cd、Cr在土壤中形态分布的影响[J]. 河南师范大学学报, 2013(5):101-105.
[23] 曹晨亮, 王卫, 马义兵, 等. 钝化剂-锌肥降低烟草镉含量长期效果研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(3):628-636.
[24] 王宇霞, 郝秀珍, 苏玉红, 等. 不同钝化剂对Cu、Cr和Ni复合污染土壤的修复研究[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(1):123-130.
[25] 杜衍红, 王向琴, 刘传平, 等. 铁改性木本泥炭对镉砷复合污染稻田的修复效果研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2021, 42(2):311-320.
[26] DONG M F, FENG R W, WANG R G, et al. Inoculation of Fe/Mn- oxidizing bacteria enhances Fe/Mn plaque formation and reduces Cd and As accumulation in rice plant tissues[J]. Plant and Soil, 2016, 404(1-2): 75-83.
[27] YANG C M, JUANG K W. Alleviation effects of calcium and potassium on cadmium rhizotoxicity and absorption by soybean and wheat roots[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2015, 178(5): 748-754.
[28] 王陈丝丝. 在稻麦轮作制度下施用钝化剂对镉污染土壤修复的研究[J]. 农家参谋, 2021(16):90-91.
[29] 邱尧, 刘备, 何霖, 等. 增施生物有机肥对水稻产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(13):1-5.
[30] 杨静, 谭永锋, 肖志强, 等. 不同剂量石灰对酸化稻田土壤养分含量及水稻产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(36):175-176.
[31] 胡雪芳, 田志清, 梁亮, 等. 不同改良剂对铅镉污染农田水稻重金属积累和产量影响的比较分析[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(7):3409-3 417.
[32] 谢洪宝, 于贺, 陈一民, 等. 秸秆深埋对不同氮肥水平土壤蔗糖酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(24):79-83.
[33] TENG Y, ZHOU Q X. Response of soil enzymes,functional bacterial groups,and microbial communities exposed to sudan I-IV[J]. Ecotoxicology Aid Environmental Safety, 2018, 166: 328-335.
[34] 陈小锦, 沈鹏飞, 陈博阳, 等. 不同蚓粪添加量对红壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(11):443-445.
[35] HU X F, JIANG Y, SHU Y, et al. Effects of mining wastewater discharges on heavy metal pollution and soil enzyme activity of the paddy fields[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2014, 147: 139-150.
[36] 魏子艳, 王金花, 夏晓明, 等. 三种抗生素对蔬菜种子芽与根伸长的生态毒性效应[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(2):237-242.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.