Special Thesis & Basic Research

Indoor Bacteriostatic Effects of 16 Fungicides against Three Pathogenic Bacteria from Rice

Expand
  • 1China National Rice Research Institute/State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Breeding, Hangzhou 311400, China
    2Soil Fertilizer, Plant Protection and Energy Station of Lishui City, Lishui, Zhejiang 323000, China
    3Ningbo Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315040, China

Received date: 2023-05-16

  Online published: 2023-11-21

Abstract

In recent years, rice leaf diseases caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Pantoea ananatis and Enterobacter asburiae respectively, are emerging and prevalent. It is urgent to screen effective fungicides for accurate controlling these bacterial diseases infecting rice leaf. In this study, the plate inhibition zone method was used to measure the bacteriostatic activity of 16 fungicides against three above pathogenic bacteria. The results showed that five antibiotics, including 40% streptomycin, 80% ethylicin, 3% zhongshegnmycin, 35% quinolone-copper tetramycin and 6% priminomycin had the significant bacteriostatic effect on three pathogenic bacteria. Among them, 80% ethoallicin (10 000 mg/L) showed the best bacteriostatic effect on Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae isolate FY517, and the inhibition zone was 22.2 mm. Otherwise, 40% streptomycin (10 000 mg/L) had the best inhibitory effect on Pantoea ananatis isolate SX1 and Enterobacter asburiae isolate HZ27, and the inhibition zone was 27.8 mm and 24.2 mm, respectively.

Cite this article

HOU Yuxuan, YU Lin, LI Yang, CHEN Jianghua . Indoor Bacteriostatic Effects of 16 Fungicides against Three Pathogenic Bacteria from Rice[J]. China Rice, 2023 , 29(6) : 28 -32 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.06.006

References

[1] 冯洁. 植物病原细菌分类最新进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(12):2305-2 314.
[2] MEW T W. Current stantus and future prospects of research on bacterial blight rice[J]. Annu Review of Phytopathology, 1987, 25: 359-382.
[3] 章琦. 水稻白叶枯病抗性的遗传及改良[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007.
[4] KIM M K, RYU J S, LEE Y, et al. First report of Pantoea sp. induced soft rot disease of Pleurotus eryngii in Korea[J]. Plant Disease, 2007.
[5] COUTINHO T A, VENTER S N. Pantoea ananatis: An unconventional plant pathogen[J]. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2009, 10 (3): 325-335.
[6] ALIPPI A M, LOPEZ A C. First report of leaf spot disease of maize caused by Pantoea ananatis in Argentina[J]. Plant Disease, 2010.
[7] CARR E A, BONASERA J M, ZAID A M, et al. First report of bulb disease of onion caused by Pantoea ananatis in New York[J]. Plant Disease, 2010.
[8] DE MAAYER P, Chan W Y, VENTER S N, et al. Genome sequence of Pantoea ananatis LMG20103, the causative agent of Eucalyptus blight and dieback[J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 2010, 192 (11): 2 936-2 937.
[9] EGOROVA M, MAZURIN E, IGNATOV A N. First report of Pantoea ananatis causing grain discolouration and leaf blight of rice in Russia[J]. New Disease Reports, 2015.
[10] KINI K, AGNIMONHAN R, AFOLABI O, et al. First report of a new bacterial leaf blight of rice caused by Pantoea ananatis and Pantoea stewartii in Togo[J]. Plant Disease, 2017, 101: 241.
[11] KINI K, AGNIMONHAN R, AFOLABI O, et al. First report of a new bacterial leaf blight of rice caused by Pantoea ananati and Pantoea stewartii in Benin[J]. Plant Disease, 2017, 101: 242.
[12] KRAWCZYK K, WIELKOPOLAN B, OBREPALSKA-STEPLOWSKA A. Pantoea ananatis, a new bacterial pathogen affecting wheat plants (Triticum L.) in Poland[J]. Pathogens, 2020.
[13] YU L, YANG C D, JI Z J, et al. First report of new bacterial leaf blight of rice caused by Pantoea ananatis in southeast China[J]. Plant Disease, 2021.
[14] DING X, LU C, HAO M, et al. First report of new bacterial leaf streak of rice caused by pantoea ananatis in China[J]. Plant Disease, 2022, 106: 1 747.
[15] DONI F, SUHAIMI N S M, IRAWAN B, et al. Associations of Pantoea with rice plants: As friends or foes?[J]. Agriculture-Basel, 2021.
[16] LV L, LUO J, AHMED T, et al. Beneficial effect and potential risk of Pantoea on rice production[J]. Plants, 2022.
[17] JONES J B, CHASE A R, HARRIS G K. Evaluation of the biolog GN microplate system for identification of some plant-pathogenic bacteria[J]. Plant Disease, 1993, 77: 553-558.
[18] WANG G F, XIE G L, ZHU B, et al. Identification and characterization of the Enterobacter complex causing mulberry (Morus alba) wilt disease in China[J]. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2010, 126 (4): 465-478.
[19] XUE Y, HU M, CHEN S S, et al. Enterobacter asburiae and Pantoea ananatis causing rice bacterial blight in China[J]. Plant Disease, 2021, 105: 2 078-2 088.
[20] 翟婧, 吴水祥, 赵丽稳, 等. 宁波市水稻白叶枯病重发原因分析与防控对策思考[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2022, 42(8):85-88.
[21] 王华弟, 陈剑平, 严成其, 等. 中国南方水稻白叶枯病发生流行动态与绿色防控技术[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(12):2051-2 059.
[22] 吴水祥, 徐抗冬, 狄蕊, 等. 几种药剂防治水稻白叶枯病效果试验[J]. 湖北植保, 2022(2): 38-40.
[23] 余山红, 应俊杰. 67种药剂对水稻白叶枯病菌的室内毒力学[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(8):1821-1 824.
[24] 王大会, 蒋承宇, 王忠宇, 等. 一种烟草细菌性叶枯病病原鉴定及防治药剂筛选[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(3):65-70.
[25] DONI F, ISHAK M N, SUHAIMI N M, et al. Leaf blight disease of rice caused by Pantoea: Profile of an increasingly damaging disease in rice[J]. Tropical Plant Pathology, 2023, 48 (1): 1-10.
[26] 蒙姣荣, 蒙月月, 朱丽玲, 等. 广西桑树细菌性枯萎病菌生物学特性及防治药剂筛选[J]. 广西植保, 2015, 28(3):1-7.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.