Special Thesis & Basic Research

Effects of Water Management Pattern on Productive Efficiency During Paddy Rice-crayfish Co-culture Mode

Expand
  • 1Lixiahe Area Agricultural Sciences Research Institute, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225007, China
    2Research Center for Eco-Agricultural Engineering and Technology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225007, China

Received date: 2023-05-23

  Online published: 2023-11-21

Abstract

Two water management modes, namely, “alternating dry and wet” (RC) and “long-term deep water irrigation” (RS), were established in 2020 and 2021 to explore the effects of different water management modes on rice nitrogen use efficiency, rice quality and yield, crayfish yield and size distribution under rice shrimp co cropping mode. The results showed that compared with RC treatment, RS treatment had a trend to reduce rice nitrogen use efficiency and rice quality. In 2021, the nitrogen agronomic efficiency and amylose content of RS treatment were significantly lower than those of RC treatment, the protein content was significantly higher than that of RC treatment, and the comprehensive score of taste value was slightly lower than that of RC treatment (p>0.05). In the experiments in 2020 and 2021, the actual grain yield of RS treatment exceeded the stable yield target of 7.5 t/hm2, and the difference with RC treatment is not significant. In addition, RS treatment could effectively increase the total yield and the yield which individual weight over 35 g(112.51%-115.56%、261.76%-450.09%) by significantly increasing the average weight and decreasing the volatility of individual weight(34.18%-42.64%、4.84%-32.37%). Therefore, the“long-term deep water irrigation” mode not only ensure stable yield of rice but also improve the economic benefits of crawfish culture.

Cite this article

XU Rong, HAN Guangming, YANG Ting, KOU Xiangming, WU Liming, MA Linjie, ZHANG Chenxin, WANG Shouhong . Effects of Water Management Pattern on Productive Efficiency During Paddy Rice-crayfish Co-culture Mode[J]. China Rice, 2023 , 29(6) : 56 -60 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.06.011

References

[1] “十三五”中国稻渔综合种养产业发展报告[J]. 中国水产, 2022,(1): 43-52.
[2] 陈国奇, 窦志, 邢志鹏, 等. 江苏“水稻-小龙虾”综合种养稻田杂草群落及其防控技术调查:以12个基地为例[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(2):2-5.
[3] 褚光, 展明飞, 朱宽宇, 等. 干湿交替灌溉对水稻产量与水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(7):1026-1 036.
[4] 张耗, 马丙菊, 张春梅, 等. 全生育期干湿交替灌溉对稻米品质及淀粉特性的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2020, 41(6): 1-8.
[5] 胡继杰, 朱练峰, 胡志华, 等. 土壤增氧方式对其氮素转化和水稻氮素利用及产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(1): 167-174.
[6] 付景, 刘洁, 曹转勤, 等. 结实期干湿交替灌溉对2个超级稻品种结实率和粒重的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(6):1056-1 065.
[7] 曹小闯, 刘晓霞, 马超, 等. 干湿交替灌溉改善稻田根际氧环境进而促进氮素转化和水稻氮素吸收[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(1):1-14.
[8] 徐国伟, 江孟孟, 陆大克, 等. 干湿交替灌溉与氮肥形态耦合对水稻光合特性及氮素利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(7):1239-1 250.
[9] 石吕, 张新月, 孙惠艳, 等. 不同类型水稻品种稻米蛋白质含量与蒸煮食味品质的关系及后期氮肥的效应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6):541-552.
[10] 刘立军, 李鸿伟, 赵步洪, 等. 结实期干湿交替处理对稻米品质的影响及其生理机制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(1):77-84.
[11] 蔡昆争, 吴学祝, 骆世明, 等. 抽穗期不同程度水分胁迫对水稻产量和根叶渗透调节物质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(12):6148 -6 158.
[12] 郭相平, 张烈君, 王琴, 等. 拔节孕穗期水分胁迫对水稻生理特性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2006(2):125-129.
[13] 杨胜玲, 黄兴成, 刘彦伶, 等. 长期有机肥无机肥配施对水稻氮素吸收、转运及产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(6):63-68.
[14] 刘少君, 李文博, 熊启中, 等. 稻虾共作磷素平衡特征及生态经济效益研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(10):2179-2 188.
[15] 彭成林, 袁家富, 佀国涵, 等. 长期稻虾共作模式下稻田钾素平衡状况及合理施钾量研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(4):135-141.
[16] 佀国涵, 袁家富, 彭成林, 等. 稻虾共作模式氮和磷循环特征及平衡状况[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(9):1309-1 318.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.