Special Thesis & Basic Research

Effects of Different Irrigation Water Rate on Rice Yield and Water Use Efficiency

Expand
  • 1South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
    2Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Guangdong Key Laboratory of New Technology in Rice Breeding/ Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding of High Quality Rice in South China (Co-construction by Ministry and Province), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Guangdong Rice Engineering Laboratory, Guangzhou 510640, China
    3Guangzhou Academy of Agriculture and Rural Sciences, Guangzhou 510470, China
First author contact:# Co-first author

Received date: 2024-07-24

  Online published: 2024-09-12

Abstract

Water-saving irrigation is an important measure to improve water use efficiency and efficient rice production. The effects of four different irrigation water amounts on the yield, biomass, and water grain production efficiency of the widely planted rice variety Yuehesimiao were studied by pot experiment in Southern China. The results showed that with the decrease of irrigation water rate, the number of grains per panicle of rice decreased gradually, and the seed setting rate increased gradually, and the rice yield first increased and then decreased. Compared with CK (long-term flooding irrigation, 38.6 L/pot), T2 treatment (88.6% of long-term flooding irrigation water rate) increased rice yield by 14.55%, T4 treatment (36.8% of long-term flooding irrigation water rate) decreased rice yield by 45.28%, but there was no significant difference in T3 treatment (62.4% of long-term flooding irrigation water rate), indicating that reducing irrigation water consumption by 37.6% does not affect rice yield. Compared with CK, the biomass of T4 treatment significantly decreased by 50.84%, while was no significant difference in T2 and T3 treatments. Among the four treatments, the water grain production efficiency was the highest in T3 treatment, significantly increased by 62.38% compared to CK. In summary, under the conditions of this experiment, reducing irrigation water consumption by 37.6% does not result in a decrease in rice yield, and the water grain production efficiency is the highest.

Cite this article

CAI Haoyang, HAN Menghong, CHEN Junlin, LU Chusheng, WANG Junjiang, LIAO Jiahui, LU Zhanhua, LIANG Kaiming, YIN Yuanhong, YE Qunhuan, FU Youqiang, CHENG Xiong . Effects of Different Irrigation Water Rate on Rice Yield and Water Use Efficiency[J]. China Rice, 2024 , 30(5) : 103 -106 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2024.05.015

References

[1] 朱德峰, 程式华, 张玉屏, 等. 全球水稻生产现状与制约因素分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(3):474-479.
[2] 潘圣刚, 曹凑贵, 蔡明历, 等. 不同灌溉模式下氮肥水平对水稻氮素利用效率、产量及其品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(2):283-289.
[3] 姚林, 郑华斌, 刘建霞, 等. 中国水稻节水灌溉技术的现状及发展趋势[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(5):1381-1 387.
[4] 茆智. 水稻节水灌溉及其对环境的影响[J]. 中国工程科学, 2002, 4(7):8-16.
[5] 杨谦, 李京咏, 戴林, 等. 灌溉方式对水稻产量、品质与抗倒性影响的研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(5):13-16.
[6] 王悦, 吴周周, 刘佳欣, 等. 灌溉模式与施氮方式对北方粳稻产量及干物质积累的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(5):71-77.
[7] 伍龙梅, 陈德威, 卢李威, 等. 孕穗期和灌浆期水分胁迫及复水对桂两优2号生理及产量的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2014, 45(6):955-960.
[8] 邵玺文, 马景勇, 童淑媛, 等. 灌浆乳熟期不同水分处理对水稻产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2006, 25(3): 41-43.
[9] 张瑞珍, 邵玺文, 童淑媛, 等. 开花期水分胁迫对水稻产量构成及产量的影响[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2006, 28 (1):1-3.
[10] 邵玺文, 张瑞珍, 齐春艳, 等. 拔节孕穗期水分胁迫对水稻生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2004, 26(3):237-241.
[11] 江学海, 李刚华, 王绍华, 等. 不同生育阶段干旱胁迫对杂交稻产量的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2015, 38(2):173-181.
[12] 张卫星, 朱德峰, 林贤青, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同超级稻品种植株形态和干物质积累的影响[J]. 福建农业学报, 2010, 25(1):47-52.
[13] 王秋菊. 分蘖期水分胁迫对水稻生长发育的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2009, 15(5):29-31.
[14] 蔡志欢, 赵瑞, 刘逸童, 等. 不同水分管理方式对优质杂交晚稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2017, 32(6):59-63.
[15] 黎国喜, 唐湘如, 程艳波, 等. 水稻产量和构成对持续干旱胁迫的补偿效应初探[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 47(3):94-99.
[16] NORTON G J, SHAFAEI M, TRAVIS A J, et al. Impact of alternate wetting and drying on rice physiology, grain production, and grain quality[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017, 205: 1-13.
[17] 周欢, 原保忠, 柯传勇, 等. 灌溉水量对水稻生长和产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2010, 29(2): 99-101.
[18] 徐国伟, 吕强, 陆大克, 等. 干湿交替灌溉耦合施氮对水稻根系性状及籽粒库活性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(10):1495-1 505.
[19] 邓环, 曹凑贵, 程建平, 等. 不同灌溉方式对水稻生物学特性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(3):602-606.
[20] 张耗, 黄钻华, 王静超, 等. 江苏中籼水稻品种演进过程中根系形态生理性状的变化及其与产量的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(6):1020-1 030.
[21] RAMASAMY S, TEN B H F M, PURUSHOTHAMAN S. Yield formation in rice in response to drainage and nitrogen application[J]. Field Crops Research, 1997, 51(1-2): 65-82.
[22] 杨建昌, 王维, 王学明, 等. 结实期旱育秧水稻对土壤水分的反应[J]. 江苏农学院学报, 1998, 19(3): 18-22.
[23] 张恒栋, 张发丽, 石明, 等. 不同移栽群体和水分调控对水稻分蘖成穗的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(6):20-23.
[24] 尹鹏, 沈佳佳, 韩璐, 等. 干旱胁迫对‘新林1号’杨生理生化的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2024, 52(4):1-8.
[25] 王晨阳. 土壤水分胁迫对小麦形态及生理影响的研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 1992, 26(1): 89-98.
[26] 于广洋. 浅谈北方水稻节水灌溉栽培技术[J]. 南方农机, 2023(6):75-77.
[27] 姜熙, 佟延旭. 辽宁东部地区水稻节水灌溉试验研究[J]. 吉林水利, 2022(3):58-62.
[28] 詹可, 邹应斌. 水稻分蘖特性及成穗规律研究进展[J]. 作物研究, 2007(suppl1):588-592.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.