Varieties & Technology

Study on the Ecological Adaptability of High-quality Japonica Rice from Heilongjiang Province in Rotation Mode of Tobacco Production Area in Yunnan Province

Expand
  • 1Crop Cultivation and Tillage Institute, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, China
    2Institute of Agricultural Resources & Environment, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China
    3Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Cold Region, Harbin 150086, China
    4Heilongjiang Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Crop Cold Damage, Harbin 150086, China
    5Yuxi Branch, Yunnan Tobacco Company, Yuxi, Yunnan 653100, China
    6Yunnan Weather Modification Center, Kunming 650034, China
    7Qiqihar Branch, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qiqihar, Heilongjiang 161006, China
First author contact:

#Co-first author

Received date: 2024-10-14

  Online published: 2025-03-12

Abstract

Tobacco- faba bean -rice rotation is one of the important technical measures for optimizing soil structure, reducing pest and disease incidence, and improving the quality of tobacco leaves in tobacco-growing areas. To enrich the resource of high-quality rice varieties suitable for the tobacco- faba bean-rice rotation in Yuxi, Yunnan, this study explored the feasibility of introducing high-quality early-maturing japonica rice varieties from Heilongjiang to the Yuxi tobacco-growing area. Using cold-region high-quality japonica rice varieties Longdao 18, Longdao 21, Songgeng 9 and Songgeng 22 as experimental materials, a field comparative trial was conducted in Yuxi City, Yunnan Province, and Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province in 2023. In terms of light and heat resources, the active accumulated temperature during the rice growing season(May to September) in Yuxi, Yunnan, and Harbin, Heilongjiang, was 3,344.5 ℃ and 3,076.4 ℃, respectively, with average temperatures of 21.9 ℃ and 20.1 ℃, daily temperature ranges of 9.3 ℃ and 10.6 ℃, and sunshine hours of 737.0 h and 1,226.6 h, respectively. In terms of growth and development, the days from transplanting to maturity for Longdao 18, Longdao 21, Songgeng9 and Songgeng 22 in Yuxi were shortened by 6 d, 4 d, 5 d, and 4 d, respectively, compared to Harbin. Among them, the days from transplanting to tillering were shortened by 13 d, 12 d, 12 d, and 11 d, respectively; the days from tillering to initial heading were shortened by 14 d, 13 d, 14 d, and 18 d, respectively; the days from initial heading to full heading were increased by 6 d, 3 d, 4 d, and 3 d, respectively; and the days from full heading to maturity were increased by 15 d, 18 d, 17 d, and 22 d, respectively. In terms of yield, compared to Harbin, the actual yield of Longdao 21 and Songgeng 22 in Yuxi increased by 2.82% and 9.04%, respectively, while the actual yield of Longdao 18 and Songgeng 9 decreased by 4.89% and 6.55%, respectively. Except for Songgeng 22, the yield differences between the two locations for the other varieties did not reach a significant level. Further analisis of the yield composition factors of various varieties revealed the number of panicles per unit area increased, but there was a downward trend in the number of grains per panicle, seed setting rate, and thousand-grain weight for most varieties. The number of grains per unit area (number of panicles per unit area × number of grains per panicle) was the key factor affecting yield changes. In terms of quality traits, the brown rice rate, milled rice rate, whole milled rice rate, taste value, and amylose content of all varieties decreased to varying degrees, while the protein content generally increased; there was no clear pattern in the changes of chalky grain rate and chalkiness degree. In summary, Yuxi, Yunnan, has similar light and heat resources to Harbin, Heilongjiang, during the rice growing season. The introduction of Heilongjiang rice varieties to Yuxi can effectively shorten the period from transplanting to maturity, better adapting to the tobacco- faba bean-rice rotation mode. Introducing varieties with a higher number of panicles can help ensure rice yield under the tobacco- faba bean-rice rotation mode.

Cite this article

CUI Shize, WU Di, YANG Xianli, CHEN Hua, YANG Chuanming, WANG Lizhi, WANG Yangyang, LI Jiangzhou, YIN Liyun, JIANG Shukun, ZHANG Xijuan . Study on the Ecological Adaptability of High-quality Japonica Rice from Heilongjiang Province in Rotation Mode of Tobacco Production Area in Yunnan Province[J]. China Rice, 2025 , 31(2) : 64 -69 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.02.011

References

[1] 杜彩艳, 吴迪, 李家逵, 等. 施氮量对抚仙湖流域烟田氮磷流失及氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(3):80-87.
[2] 赵文军, 田阳阳, 常立, 等. 抚仙湖流域植烟土壤养分特征及烟叶综合质量对比[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 46(5):513-518.
[3] 许业宝, 肖梅, 金磊, 等. 基于皖南烟稻轮作区稻虾共育绿色生产技术集成与效益分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(2):103-105.
[4] 周旭东, 韩天华, 申云鑫, 等. 4种轮作模式下长期连作烟田土壤微生态的响应特征[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(3):174-187.
[5] 敖金成, 李博, 阎凯, 等. 连作对云南典型烟区植烟土壤细菌群落多样性的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(1):46-54.
[6] 张笑宇, 段宏群, 王闷灵, 等. 轮作与连作对烟田土壤微生物区系及多样性的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(6):84-90.
[7] 饶德安, 刘潘洋, 邹路易, 等. 长期连作及强还原土壤灭菌处理对烤烟根际土壤真菌群落的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(4):47-56.
[8] 蒋如, 宁诗琪, 隋宗明, 等. 长期轮作施肥处理对植烟土壤有机碳组分和酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤, 2024, 56(3):510-516.
[9] 廖欣, 梁玉刚, 陈治锋, 等. “烟草-水稻”轮作模式耦合养鸡养鱼的技术要点[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(1):108-112.
[10] 孟祥佳, 刘洋, 黎妍妍, 等. 烟草-荞麦轮作对烟草黑胫病防治及土壤微生态的调控作用[J]. 南方农业学报, 2022, 53(6):1 525-1 535.
[11] 陈玉蓝, 林正全, 拓阳阳, 等. 烟蒜轮作对易感病烟田土壤真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(4):972-980.
[12] 周彪, 杨树明, 李顺, 等. 羊肚菌轮作及其菌渣还田对烤烟根际土壤环境及产量与品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2024, 37(5):1 010-1 018.
[13] ZHANG Z F, CUI B Y, LI Y F, et al. Effects of tobacco-rice rotation on rice planthoppers Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) and Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) (Homoptera: Delphacidae) in China[J]. Plant and Soil, 2015, 392(1-2): 333-344.
[14] 曹明锋, 宁尚辉, 祝利, 等. 烟草-早熟食用豆轮作模式研究[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2019(12):26-29.
[15] 郝汉驰, 肖子曼, 肖艳松, 等. 烟-稻轮作典型烟田团聚体分布特征及其与土壤养分、作物产量的关系[J]. 湖南生态科学学报, 2024, 11(1):39-48.
[16] 黄锦文, 李日坤, 陈志诚, 等. 不同稻草还田技术对烟-稻轮作系统土壤养分、有机碳及微生物多样性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4):415-426.
[17] 何仲秋, 王晓琳, 张启明, 等. 东南烟稻轮作区烤烟临界氮浓度稀释曲线的建立与验证[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(11):2 001-2 009.
[18] 刘奇华. 引进水稻品种主要农艺性状及其产量、品质的分析与筛选[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2007.
[19] 魏兴华, 汤圣祥, 余汉勇, 等. 中国水稻国外引种概况及效益分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2010, 24(1):5-11.
[20] 欧阳由男, 王艳丽, 叶淑珍, 等. 基于目标区域温光比较的双季早粳稻试种[J]. 农业研究与应用, 2021, 34(5):8-14.
[21] 宋远丽, 栾维江. 水稻开花的光温调控分子机理[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(4):383-392.
[22] 魏祥进, 徐俊锋, 江玲, 等. 我国水稻主栽品种抽穗期多样性的遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(1):10-22.
[23] 陈涨, 李渊, 王嘉琪, 等. 水稻冠层温度对环境温度的响应及其调控机制[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(36):1-7.
[24] 宋有金, 吴超, 李子煜, 等. 水稻产量对生殖生长阶段不同时期高温的响应差异[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(2):177-186.
[25] 宋春燕, 万运帆, 李玉娥, 等. 温度和CO2浓度升高下双季稻茎蘖动态、成穗率与产量的关系[J]. 作物杂志, 2023(3):159-166.
[26] 王萌萌, 杨沈斌, 江晓东, 等. 光温要素对水稻群体茎蘖增长动态影响的分析及模拟[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(1):82-92.
[27] 冯向前, 徐建强, 沈足金, 等. 播期对籼粳杂交稻甬优1540产量、品质的影响及其与气候因子的相关性[J]. 中国稻米, 2024, 30(1):108-114.
[28] 唐健, 唐闯, 郭保卫, 等. 江西不同生态区优质双季晚稻产量、品质及温光资源利用差异[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 40(6):8-15.
[29] 徐春梅, 袁立伦, 陈松, 等. 长江下游不同生态区双季优质晚稻生长特性和温光利用差异[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(5):457-469.
[30] 曹海珺, 曹海鑫, 田奉俊, 等. 日照时数与水稻产量性状的相关分析[J]. 安徽农学通报(上半月刊), 2012, 18(19):48-49.
[31] 崔弘, 刘迪, 宋振伟, 等. 北方优质粳稻品种产量、品质对温光响应特征及适应性[J]. 分子植物育种, 2023, 21(5):1 665-1 674.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.