Varieties & Technology

Effects of Sowing Densities on Lodging Resistance, Yields and Quality of Rice under Mechanical Strip Sowing Mode

Expand
  • 1Jiangdu Agriculture Technology and Integrated Service Center, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225200, China
    2Yangzhou Agriculture Technology and Integrated Service Center, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China
First author contact:

1st author: 541807274@qq.com

Received date: 2024-08-27

  Online published: 2025-03-12

Abstract

To investigate the effects of sowing density on lodging resistance, yield, yield formation and quality of rice under mechanical strip sowing mode, the experiment were conducted using conventional japonica rice varieties Nangeng 9108 and Nangeng 5718 as materials, with five sowing densities set for each variety, namely 90.0, 112.5, 135.0, 157.5, and 180.0 kg/hm2. The results showed that with the increase of sowing density, the number of tillers and effective ears increased, while the plant height, ear length, and bending resistance decreased, the yield first increased and then decreased. With the increase of sowing density, the brown rice rate, polished rice rate, and whole polished rice rate first increased and then decreased, while the protein content first decreased and then increased. Nangeng 9108 and Nangeng 5718 achieved their highest yields at sowing densities of 112.5 kg/hm2 and 135.0 kg/hm2, respectively. The yield and appearance quality of Nangeng 5718 were better than those of Nangeng 9108, but the processing quality and taste were not as good as those of Nangeng 9108.

Cite this article

ZHANG Yan, CHEN Jingdu, XIN Haibin, TANG Jianpeng, LIU Cuilian, FAN Xiaokai . Effects of Sowing Densities on Lodging Resistance, Yields and Quality of Rice under Mechanical Strip Sowing Mode[J]. China Rice, 2025 , 31(2) : 97 -101 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.02.017

References

[1] 林骑龙. 推广水稻机插秧,推进农业机械化[J]. 世界热带农业信息, 2023(9): 90-91.
[2] 徐莹莹, 刘玉涛, 王俊河, 等. 水稻旱直播研究现状及发展前景[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2018(6):150-152.
[3] 于居龙, 张国, 朱阿秀, 等. 江苏丘陵地区旱直播水稻田杂草化除技术[J]. 杂草学报, 2022, 40(1):34-41.
[4] 张洪程, 胡雅杰, 杨建昌, 等. 中国特色水稻栽培学发展与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7):1 301-1 321.
[5] 罗锡文, 王在满, 曾山, 等. 水稻机械化直播技术研究进展[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2019, 40(5):1-13.
[6] 冯延江, 王麒, 赵宏亮, 等. 我国水稻直播技术研究现状及展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(1):23-27.
[7] 王文霞, 易艳红, 周燕芝, 等. 旱直播提高南方旱稻产量及抗倒伏性状[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(2):383-391.
[8] 李绍平, 邢志鹏, 田晋钰, 等. 机械旱直播方式对水稻产量和光合物质生产特征的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(7):1-9.
[9] 黄健, 朱安, 汪浩, 等. 水直播和旱直播对水稻产量与品质的影响综述[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(16):67-73.
[10] 黎雨薇, 黄志谋, 杨汉, 等. 栽培方式对不同品种水稻产量和经济效益的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(11):5-10.
[11] 倪艳云, 闵思桂, 赵江海, 等. 高邮市水稻不同直播模式技术比较试验[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2021, 38(5):28-32.
[12] 曾波, 李爱宏, 黄年生, 等. 不同播种量对直播水稻品比试验的影响研究[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(2):152-155.
[13] 赵新阳, 陈焕金, 韩杰, 等. 不同水稻机械化直播技术应用与对比[J]. 南方农机, 2022, 53(3):23-26.
[14] 张建萍, 杨永杰, 于晓玥, 等. 除草剂不同时期应用对机直播稻田杂草的防除作用[J]. 中国稻米, 2024, 30(2):91-94.
[15] 鲍海波, 刘宝生, 周长勇, 等. 江淮地区机械旱直播粳稻与机插秧粳稻病虫草害发生差异[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(23):124-131.
[16] 董立尧, 高原, 房加鹏, 等. 我国水稻田杂草抗药性研究进展[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(5):69-76.
[17] 朱新云, 施慎年, 吴佳文. 水稻旱直播田47%氯吡·丙·异可湿性粉剂除草效果及安全性[J]. 杂草学报, 2016, 34(4):39-42.
[18] 童纪氚, 戎雪利, 任萍, 等. 水稻无人机直播产量、效益及技术要点[J]. 中国稻米, 2024, 30(1):98-100.
[19] 徐春春, 纪龙, 陈中督, 等. 基于农户需求的水稻绿色生产发展策略[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(3):327-331.
[20] 张耀元, 胡星晨, 孙冬, 等. 江苏省直播稻种植主要问题与对策—基于“农技耘”APP问答数据的调查研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2024, 30(3):78-83.
[21] 瀬古秀生, 佐本啓智, 鈴木嘉一郎. 水稲の倒伏に及ぼす二,三栽培条件の影響(II)[J]. 日本作物学会紀事, 1959, 27(2):173-176.
[22] 赵杰, 李邵平, 程爽, 等. “独杆”栽培模式下全程氮肥在分蘖中后期施用对旱直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6):1 162-1 174.
[23] 朱伦. 早稻旱直播栽培试验初报[J]. 广西农学报, 2008, 23(3):10-11.
[24] 王柏秋, 王宇, 王诗宇. 播种量对滨海稻区水稻机械旱直播产量、米质及经济效益的影响[J]. 北方水稻, 2024, 54(1):8-11.
[25] 张建军, 刘红, 蒋小平, 等. 直播方式与播种量组合对水稻群体发育与产量构成的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 25(12):1 802-1 814.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.