Special Thesis & Basic Research

Effects of Straw and Milk Vetch Returning to Replace Part of Chemical Fertilizer on Soil Health in Paddy Field

Expand
  • 1China National Rice Research Institute/State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Breeding, Hangzhou 310006, China
    2Tongxiang Agricultural Science Research Institute, Jiaxing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tongxiang, Zhejiang 314500, China

Received date: 2024-07-22

  Online published: 2025-05-14

Abstract

The health level of paddy soil is one of the key factors constraining the sustainable increase in rice yield. Four treatments were set up in the experiment: conventional fertilization (T0), milk vetch returning (T1), straw returning (T2), and straw returning combined with organic fertilizer application (T3). The aim was to explore the effects of soil health cultivation measures, such as straw, Chinese milk vetch returning and organic fertilizer application on rice yield, soil physical and chemical properties and health index. The results showed that, compared with conventional fertilization (T0), implementing soil health cultivation measures significantly improved soil physical properties and nutrient level. Specifically, there was a significant decrease in soil bulk density and a significant increase in the proportion of large water-stable aggregates, and the contents of soil organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium all increased significantly. In terms of biological activity, soil health cultivation measures increased soil microbial biomass carbon content, promoted soil respiration, and improved soil microbial diversity index. In terms of rice yield, the rice yield of T3 treatment was 5.1% significantly higher than that of T0 treatment. Although the rice yield of T1 and T2 treatments was lower than that of T0 treatment, but the difference was not significant. The results of soil health assessment using the full data set method showed that soil health cultivation measures could improve the soil health index of paddy field. Among them, the rice paddy soil health index of T3 treatment was the highest, reaching 0.80. In summary, adopting the aforementioned soil health cultivation measures can not only improve the structure of rice paddy soil while ensuring stable rice yields but also enhance soil fertility, biological activity, and health index, thereby promoting the sustainable development of rice production.

Cite this article

LIANG Qingduo, WU Yong, ZHU Yuxiang, CHEN Shurong, TIAN Wenhao, ZHU Chunquan, KONG Yali, CAO Xiaochuang, ZHANG Junhua, ZHU Lianfeng . Effects of Straw and Milk Vetch Returning to Replace Part of Chemical Fertilizer on Soil Health in Paddy Field[J]. China Rice, 2025 , 31(3) : 53 -58 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.03.008

References

[1] 孔亚丽, 秦华, 朱春权, 等. 土壤微生物影响土壤健康的作用机制研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2024, 61(2):331-347.
[2] 李烜桢, 骆永明, 侯德义. 土壤健康评估指标、框架及程序研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(3):617-625.
[3] 张俊伶, 张江周, 申建波, 等. 土壤健康与农业绿色发展: 机遇与对策[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(4):783-796.
[4] 仇焕广, 栾昊, 李瑾, 等. 风险规避对农户化肥过量施用行为的影响[J]. 中国农村经济, 2014(3):85-96.
[5] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2022.
[6] 李明德, 吴海勇, 聂军, 等. 稻草及其循环利用后的有机废弃物还田效用研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(17):3572-3579.
[7] YIN H J, ZHAO W Q, LI T, et al. Balancing straw returning and chemical fertilizers in China: Role of straw nutrient resources[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 81: 2695-2702.
[8] 曹卫东, 黄鸿翔. 关于我国恢复和发展绿肥若干问题的思考[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2009(4):1-3.
[9] KAMRAN M, HUANG L, NIE J, et al. Effect of reduced mineral fertilization (NPK) combined with green manure on aggregate stability and soil organic carbon fractions in a fluvo-aquic paddy soil[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, 211: 105005.
[10] GAO S J, ZHOU G P, REES R M, et al. Green manuring inhibits nitrification in a typical paddy soil by changing the contributions of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2020, 156: 103698.
[11] 王飞, 王利民, 何春梅, 等. 紫云英与有机物料连续还田在黄泥田水稻稳产提质增效中的作用[J]. 土壤, 2022, 54(3):455-463.
[12] 崔月贞, 王吕, 吴玉红, 等. 冬绿肥联合稻秆还田对水稻产量及稻田土壤肥力的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(7):100-108.
[13] 张江周, 李奕赞, 李颖, 等. 土壤健康指标体系与评价方法研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(3): 603-616.
[14] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
[15] LI Z, LUN F, LIU M, et al. Rapid diagnosis of agricultural soil health: A novel soil health index based on natural soil productivity and human management[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 277: 111402.
[16] SALLY D L, DOUGLAS L K. Bulk density as a soil quality indicator during conversion to no-tillage[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2004, 78: 143-149.
[17] 陈恩风, 关连珠, 汪景宽, 等. 土壤特征微团聚体的组成比例与肥力评价[J]. 土壤学报, 2001, 38(1):49-53.
[18] 陈剑, 齐文, 蒋海凌, 等. 西兰花废弃物堆肥与化肥减量配施对双季稻产量及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(3):93-99.
[19] 杨志臣, 吕贻忠, 张凤荣, 等. 秸秆还田和腐熟有机肥对水稻土培肥效果对比分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(3):214-218.
[20] ZHOU G P, GAO S J, LU Y H, et al. Co-incorporation of green manure and rice straw improves rice production, soil chemical, biochemical and microbiological properties in a typical paddy field in Southern China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 197: 104499.
[21] DHILLON G S, GILLESPIE A, PEAK D, et al. Spectroscopic investigation of soil organic matter composition for shelterbelt agroforestry systems[J]. Geoderma, 2017, 298: 1-13.
[22] 袁浩亮, 张江林, 鲁艳红, 等. 紫云英和秸秆替代部分化肥对双季稻产量、养分含量及土壤综合肥力的影响[J]. 土壤, 2023, 55(6):1216-1222.
[23] 顾克军, 张传辉, 顾东祥, 等. 短期不同秸秆还田与耕作方式对土壤养分与稻麦周年产量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(6):1408-1413.
[24] JIN Z W, CHEN C, CHEN X M, et al. The crucial factors of soil fertility and rapeseed yield: A five year field trial with biochar addition in upland red soil, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 649: 1467-1480.
[25] LEHAMANN J, BOSSIO D A, KNABNER I, et al. The concept and future prospects of soil health[J]. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2020, 1(10): 544-553.
[26] 刘丽媛. 有机肥配施对稻田土壤环境质量的影响及驱动机制研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2021.
[27] WANG E L, HE D, ZHAO Z G, et al. Using a systems modeling approach to improve soil management and soil quality[J]. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(3): 289.
[28] YANG T, SIDDIQUE K H M, LIU K. Cropping systems in agriculture and their impact on soil health-A review[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2020, 23: e01118.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.