Special Thesis & Basic Research

Patterns of Dry Matter Accumulation and Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Nutrient Absorption in Double-cropping Rice Varieties in Hubei Province

Expand
  • 1College of Resources and Environment/Trace Element Research Center, Huazhong Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan 430070, China
    2Hubei Provincial General Station of Arable Land Quality and Fertilizer, Wuhan 430070, China
    3Food Crops Research Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China
    4Shuangshui and Shuanglü Research Institute, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

Received date: 2025-06-02

  Online published: 2025-11-07

Abstract

Using five early-season rice varieties (Liangyou 302, Liangyou 287, Ezao 18, Ezao 17, and Liangyou 6) and five late-season rice varieties (Tyou 180, Huanghuazhan, Fengyuanyou 299, Tianyouhuazhan, and Liangyou 33) as test materials, field experiments were conducted in Zhougan Village, Dajin Town, Wuxue City, Hubei Province, in 2022. By measuring the dry matter mass and the content of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) nutrients at key growth stages of each variety, and employing the Logistic equation y=K/(1+ae-bt) to model the dry matter accumulation process in rice, we analyzed the patterns of dry matter accumulation and N, P, and K nutrient uptake in early-and late-season rice varieties, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for scientific and rational fertilization of double-cropping rice in Hubei Province. The results revealed that, in terms of dry matter accumulation, both early-and late-season rice exhibited a “slow-fast-slow” growth trend in total dry matter accumulation, with the rapid accumulation phases occurring from 59 to 95 days (lasting 36 days) and from 28 to 73 days (lasting 45 days) after transplanting, respectively. The dry matter accumulation in stems and leaves initially increased and then decreased, while that in panicles showed a continuous upward trend. Regarding nutrient uptake, the total N accumulation in both early- and late-season rice showed a continuous increase; during the rapid accumulation phase, early-season rice accumulated 52.7% of its maximum N accumulation, compared to 76.9% for late-season rice. The total accumulation of P and K initially increased and then decreased. At harvest, the N and P content in the panicles of early-season rice accounted for 63.8% and 73.9% of the total, respectively, while K content in the stems accounted for 72.8% of the total. For late-season rice, the N and P content in the panicles accounted for 69.7% and 76.2% of the total, respectively, and K content in the stems accounted for 68.6% of the total. The yield measurement results showed that the average yield of late-season rice was 7,924.6 kg/hm2, representing a 24.2% increase compared to early-season rice (6,381.5 kg/hm2). To produce 100 kg of rice grain, early-season rice required the uptake of 1.9-2.0 kg of N, 0.9-1.2 kg of P2O5, and 2.5-2.9 kg of K2O, while late-season rice required 1.5-1.8 kg of N, 0.7-1.0 kg of P2O5, and 1.6-2.1 kg of K2O. In conclusion, there are significant differences in dry matter accumulation and N, P, and K nutrient requirements between early- and late-season rice at different growth stages. In practical fertilization, the ratios of N, P, and K in fertilizers for early- and late-season rice should be adjusted to formulate targeted fertilization strategies, improve fertilizer utilization efficiency, and maximize the yield and economic benefits of double-cropping rice.

Cite this article

LIU Xiaoge, WANG Yang, DAI Zhigang, WANG Benfu, LI Xiaokun . Patterns of Dry Matter Accumulation and Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Nutrient Absorption in Double-cropping Rice Varieties in Hubei Province[J]. China Rice, 2025 , 31(6) : 46 -54 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.06.008

References

[1] ROSEGRANT M W, CLINE S A. Global food security: Challenges and policies[J]. Science, 2003, 302(5652): 1 917-1 919.
[2] CUI K, SHOEMAKER S P. A look at food security in China[J]. NPJ Science of Food, 2018, 2: 4.
[3] 刘丽, 孙炜琳, 王国刚, 等. 耕地“提质扩容”对中国粮食生产的影响分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(11): 2 601-2 618.
[4] FAN M S, SHEN J B, YUAN L X, et al. Improving crop productivity and resource use efficiency to ensure food security and environmental quality in China[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012, 63(1): 13-24.
[5] 吴文斌, 余强毅, 陆苗, 等. 耕地复种指数研究的关键科学问题[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(9):1681-1 694.
[6] 陈博, 敖和军, 曾晓珊. 我国水稻种植情况调研——基于9个水稻生产大省的调研数据[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2020(11):66-69.
[7] JIANG M, LI X B, XIN L J, et al. Paddy rice multiple cropping index changes in Southern China: Impacts on national grain production capacity and policy implications[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29: 1773-1787.
[8] 薛莲, 段圣省, 郑兴飞, 等. 湖北省水稻生产发展现状及对策建议[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4):45-47.
[9] 方福平, 程式华. 论中国水稻生产能力[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(6):559-566.
[10] 谢远玉, 黄淑娥, 田俊, 等. 长江中下游热量资源时空演变特征及其对双季稻种植的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(9):2950-2 958.
[11] 秦正, 赵景峰, 程武学, 等. 气候变化背景下秦岭-淮河地区亚热带北界变化[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2023, 19(1):38-48.
[12] 王杰, 曹瑞, 杨孟, 等. 南方水稻机械化种植工作的思考和建议[J]. 南方农机, 2024, 55(8):16-18.
[13] SHI M, PAUDEL K P, CHEN F B. Mechanization and efficiency in rice production in China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(7): 1 996-2 008.
[14] 王伟妮, 鲁剑巍, 何予卿, 等. 氮、磷、钾肥对水稻产量、品质及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(6):645-653.
[15] 姚成胜, 李慧贤, 杨一单. 中国水稻生产与化肥施用的脱钩关系及其关联效应分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(10):63-74.
[16] 刘彦伶, 李渝, 白怡婧, 等. 长期不同施肥对水稻干物质和磷素积累与转运的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(7):1146-1 156.
[17] 邹长明, 秦道珠, 徐明岗, 等. 水稻的氮磷钾养分吸收特性及其与产量的关系[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2002, 25(4): 6-10.
[18] 邵迪, 丁紫娟, 胡仁. 新型高效绿色氮肥管理对水稻产量形成与氮素利用及氨挥发损失的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2024, 30(3):18-25.
[19] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000:263-271.
[20] 崔党群. Logistic曲线方程的解析与拟合优度测验[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2005(1):112-115.
[21] 汤雷雷, 万开元, 李祖章, 等. 施肥模式对双季稻产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(2):259-268.
[22] 叶廷红, 李鹏飞, 侯文峰, 等. 早稻、晚稻和中稻干物质积累及氮素吸收利用的差异[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(2):212-222.
[23] 张卫建, 陈长青, 江瑜, 等. 气候变暖对我国水稻生产的综合影响及其应对策略[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(4):805-811.
[24] 王旭, 冯跃华, 李杰, 等. 氮磷钾肥对超级杂交水稻Q优6号干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2016, 22(6):25-29.
[25] 王森, 莫菁华, 汪洋, 等. 水稻-再生稻体系干物质积累及氮磷钾养分的吸收利用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(1):67-77.
[26] 叶廷红. 钾肥施用量对水稻产量、钾素吸收利用及稻米品质的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2021.
[27] 薛欣欣. 水稻钾素营养特性及钾肥高效施用技术研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2016.
[28] 肖敏, 郭浪, 崔璨, 等. 磷肥运筹对机插双季稻产量构成与养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2024(2):178-188.
[29] 郜紫依, 鲁剑巍, 任涛, 等. 水稻百公斤籽粒养分吸收量及其影响因素整合分析[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2023, 29(9):1587-1 596.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.