Quality Characteristics and Differences in Planting Regions of Typical Green-labelled Japonica Rice in Jiangsu Province
1st author: 20120049@jaas.ac.cn
Received date: 2025-05-06
Online published: 2025-11-07
To thoroughly investigate the effects of certification status and planting regions on the quality of japonica rice in Jiangsu Province, this study selected Nangeng 46 and Nangeng 9108, which were cultivated under both green certification and conventional planting methods, as the research objects. Samples were collected from the rice-growing regions of Southern Jiangsu, Central Jiangsu, and Northern Jiangsu, respectively. The principal component analysis method was employed to assess and evaluate the appearance quality, cooking and eating quality, as well as nutritional quality of the rice. The research results indicated that the protein content of green-certified Nangeng 46 and Nangeng 9108 decreased by 14.5% and 6.1% compared with that of rice grown under conventional methods, respectively. The planting region had a highly significant impact on the amylose content of japonica rice. For instance, the amylose content of Nangeng 46 planted in Southern Jiangsu increased by 12.9% compared with that in Central Jiangsu; the amylose content of Nangeng 9108 planted in Central Jiangsu increased by 7.6% compared with that in Northern Jiangsu(P<0.01). In terms of amino acid and beneficial mineral content, there were no significant differences among certification status, planting regions, and rice varieties. The results of the principal component analysis showed that the quality of green-certified japonica rice had stronger regional specificity. In Southern Jiangsu, the protein content of green-certified Nangeng 46 decreased by 20.7% compared with Nangeng 46 grown under conventional methods, but its taste value increased by 16.0%; in central Jiangsu, the chalkiness degree of green-certified Nangeng 9108 decreased by 13.5% compared with Nangeng 9108 grown under conventional methods. The findings of this study provide valuable reference for the high- quality development of the green rice industry.
HE Xin, ZHANG Liping, ZHAO Chunfang, ZHU Hong, LU Haiyan, LIU Xianjin, XU Chongxin, ZHANG Xiao, XIE Yajing, HANG Xiangrong . Quality Characteristics and Differences in Planting Regions of Typical Green-labelled Japonica Rice in Jiangsu Province[J]. China Rice, 2025 , 31(6) : 78 -84 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.06.012
| [1] | 王才林. 江苏省优良食味粳稻品种培育的发展与启示[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(5):82-91. |
| [2] | 王才林, 张亚东, 赵春芳, 等. 江苏省优良食味粳稻的遗传与育种研究[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(5):442-458. |
| [3] | 江苏省统计局, 国家统计局江苏调查总队. 江苏统计年鉴(2023)[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2024. |
| [4] | 丁郭明, 陆一轩, 吴陈芊, 等. 21世纪以来江苏省水稻种植面积的变化与启示[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023, 44(9):101-110. |
| [5] | 朱玮强, 张贇, 徐志刚. 产业振兴背景下的江苏稻米品牌建设:历史经验与战略选择[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(2):53-58. |
| [6] | XU J, ZHANG Z, ZHANG X, et al. Green food development in China: Experiences and challenges[J]. Agriculture, 2020, 10(12): 614. |
| [7] | HU X, ZHANG W, LU L, et al. Comparison of quality of appearance, cooking quality, and protein content of green-labeled rice and conventional rice[J]. Cereal Chemistry, 2022, 99(4): 873-883. |
| [8] | LIN L, ZHOU D, MA C. Green food industry in China: Development, problems and policies[J]. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 2010, 25(1): 69-80. |
| [9] | XU J, ZHONG J, ZHANG B, et al. Green labelled rice shows a higher nutritional and physiochemical quality than conventional rice in China[J]. Foods, 2021, 10(5): 915. |
| [10] | 葛磊, 陆建飞, 徐春春. 关于推进江苏水稻产业绿色高质量发展的思考[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(6):71-75. |
| [11] | 陆志强. 江苏省水稻育种与优质稻米产业发展策略分析[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2007. |
| [12] | 沈新平. 江苏不同纬度稻作区稻米品质生态特征研究及应用[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2007. |
| [13] | 寇祥明, 谢成林, 韩光明, 等. 3种稻田生态种养模式对稻米品质、产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 39(3):70-74. |
| [14] | 朱大伟, 章林平, 陈铭学, 等. 中国优质稻品种品质及食味感官评分值的特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7):1271-1 283. |
| [15] | 赵春芳, 岳红亮, 黄双杰, 等. 南粳系列水稻品种的食味品质与稻米理化特性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(5):909-920. |
| [16] | 梁友, 王津, 王思进, 等. 稻田环境因子对水稻生长发育和产量、品质形成的影响研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(24):1-9. |
| [17] | 景立权, 户少武, 穆海蓉, 等. 大气环境变化导致水稻品质总体变劣[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(13):2462-2 475. |
| [18] | 马晨怡. 绿色、有机稻米与常规稻米的营养品质比较研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2022. |
| [19] | 习敏, 季雅岚, 吴文革, 等. 水稻食味品质形成影响因素研究与展望[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(12):159-164. |
| [20] | 张卫星, 马晨怡, 袁玉伟, 等. 我国水稻三大优势产区稻米品质现状及区域差异[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(5):12-18. |
| [21] | 李辉, 张瑞英, 戴常军, 等. 东北三省水稻品质差异性比较[J]. 中国稻米, 2013, 19 (2):18-22. |
| [22] | 王伟, 郑梦兰, 罗佳莉, 等. 不同粳稻种植区域的稻米品质特性[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65 (4):953-956. |
| [23] | 王忠, 顾蕴洁, 陈刚, 等. 稻米的品质和影响因素[J]. 分子植物育种, 2003, 1(2):231-241. |
| [24] | 胡时友, 马朝红, 张舒, 等. 湖北省枝江市优质稻减肥增效绿色防控综合技术示范效果评价[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2018, 29(23):45-46. |
| [25] | 龚红兵, 曾生元, 李闯, 等. 江苏主栽粳稻品种的遗传与食味结构分析[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(7):1083-1 093. |
| [26] | ZANG Q, HAN X, ZHANG M J, et al. Effects of high temperature on quality of japonica rice at early and middle heading stage under different planting modes[J]. Agronomy, 2022, 12(8): 1 833. |
| [27] | 席运官, 钦佩, 丁公辉. 有机与常规种植稻米品质及安全性的分析与评价[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12(3):454-458. |
| [28] | 石吕, 张新月, 孙惠艳, 等. 不同类型水稻品种稻米蛋白质含量与蒸煮食味品质的关系及后期氮肥的效应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6):541-552. |
| [29] | 曲红岩, 张欣, 施利利, 等. 水稻食味品质主要影响因子分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(6):172-175. |
| [30] | 朱大伟, 郑欣, 余静, 等. 中国高食味北方粳稻与南方半糯粳稻品种理化特性及食味品质的差异分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(3):469-483. |
| [31] | 赵凌, 朱镇, 陈涛, 等. 水稻优良品种南粳46及其衍生品种特性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2023, 24(3):648-660. |
| [32] | 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5):1037-1 050. |
| [33] | 邵雅芳. 稻米的营养功能特点[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(6):1-11. |
| [34] | MORITA S, WADA H, MATSUE Y. Countermeasures for heat damage in rice grain quality under climate change[J]. Plant Production Science, 2016, 19(1): 1-11. |
| [35] | XIONG D L, LING X X, HUANG J L, et al. Meta-analysis and dose-response analysis of high temperature effects on rice yield and quality[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2017, 141: 1-9. |
| [36] | 刘嫒桦, 李小坤. 不同肥料施用与稻米品质关系的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3):276-284. |
| [37] | 张栋昊, 蔡妍培, 劳菲, 等. 大米蛋白质与米饭食味品质关联性研究进展[J]. 食品科学, 2023, 44(9):270-277. |
| [38] | 王才林, 张亚东, 朱镇, 等. 优良食味半糯粳稻品质标准的研制与应用[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2022, 38(1):1-8. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |