Special Thesis & Basic Research

Differences in Biological Characteristics of Rice False Smut Fungi and Resistance Evaluation of Main Cultivated Rice Varieties in Heilongjiang Province

Expand
  • Institute of Plant Protect, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Science/Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pests in Harbin, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Haerbin 150086, China
First author contact:

1st author: chunharbin@aliyun.com

Received date: 2025-08-14

  Online published: 2026-01-13

Abstract

To clarify the resistance levels of main cultivated rice varieties to rice false smut in Heilongjiang Province, this study first screened highly pathogenic strains by comparing the differences in biological characteristics among various rice false smut strains. Subsequently, the comprehensive resistance of 47 main cultivated rice varieties was evaluated using two methods: indoor artificial inoculation and field natural induction. The results indicated that the rice false smut strains Uv-AC-5, Uv-WC-1, and Uv-QA-3 exhibited relative advantages in terms of mycelial growth rate, sporulation capacity, and spore germination rate. Therefore, they were selected as the mixed inoculation strains for artificial inoculation of rice false smut. The analysis of the comprehensive resistance of the 47 main cultivated rice varieties revealed differences in resistance levels among the tested rice varieties, with an overall resistance-susceptibility ratio of 57.45∶42.55. Among them, there were 4 resistant varieties and 23 moderately resistant varieties. The finding of this study provides a scientific basis for the prevention and control of rice false smut in rice-growing areas of Heilongjiang Province, as well as for the selection and utilization of resistant varieties.

Cite this article

WANG Chun, LI Guangyu, ZHANG Suxin, HUANG Yuanju, WANG Yu, LIU Chunlai, WANG Qian . Differences in Biological Characteristics of Rice False Smut Fungi and Resistance Evaluation of Main Cultivated Rice Varieties in Heilongjiang Province[J]. China Rice, 2026 , 32(1) : 70 -75 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2026.01.012

References

[1] 何旎清, 程朝平, 晋艺丹, 等. 稻曲病发病规律、病菌功能基因组以及免疫反应的遗传机制[J]. 中国稻米, 2024, 30 (1):39-46.
[2] 季宏平, 张匀华, 王芊, 等. 黑龙江省水稻品种(系)对稻曲病的抗性鉴定[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2001(3):1-3.
[3] 黄成亮. 黑龙江省稻曲病的发生与防治[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(10):99-101.
[4] 廖欣怡, 万利, 邓春林, 等. 湖北省水稻稻曲病的发生与防治对策[J]. 湖北植保, 2023(6):62-64.
[5] 周立刚, 赖道万, 王保民, 等. 稻曲病菌毒素的研究[C]// 中国菌物学会2024年学术年会论文摘要,2024:255.
[6] 李小艳, 罗涛, 杨芳, 等. 西南地区稻曲病的发生规律及综合防治策略[J]. 南方农业, 2022, 16(18):11-13+23.
[7] 王文斌, 尹小乐, 李燕, 等. 影响稻曲病严重度主要因素的研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27(3):1067-1071.
[8] 俞咪娜, 于俊杰, 汤袁博, 等. 水稻穗部农艺性状与稻曲病抗性相关性研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(22):123-127.
[9] 方先文, 汤陵华, 王艳平. 水稻稻曲病抗性遗传机制[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2008, 24(6):762-765.
[10] 于艳敏, 来永才, 闫平, 等. 黑龙江省南部水稻品种稻曲病抗性评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(35):1-5.
[11] 杨秀娟, 王舒婷, 阮宏椿, 等. 水稻稻曲病室内人工接种技术[J]. 植物保护学报, 2011, 38(5):395-400.
[12] 胡建坤, 黄蓉, 李湘民, 等. 东乡野生稻对稻曲病抗性鉴定与分析[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2021, 43(4):774-782.
[13] 傅秀林. 从品种选育和利用的角度探讨解决吉林省稻曲病的危害问题[J]. 吉林农业科学, 1994(4):27-29.
[14] 陈志谊, 聂亚锋, 刘永锋. 江苏省水稻品种对稻曲病的抗病性鉴定及病菌致病力分化[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2009, 25(4):737-741.
[15] 徐晗, 闫晗, 褚晋, 等. 稻曲病菌致病力分化与接种处理条件优化[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(18):128-131.
[16] 李燕, 尹小乐, 刘永锋, 等. 稻曲病菌生物学特性与致病力相关性研究[J]. 植物病理学报, 2012, 42(4):353-364.
[17] 唐善军, 高杜娟, 陈友德, 等. 水稻品种稻曲病抗性鉴定研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2012, 18(3):14-18.
[18] 阮宏椿, 石妞妞, 杜宜新, 等. 福建省水稻新品种对稻曲病和穗瘟病的抗性评价[J]. 福建农业学报, 2012, 27(1):43-47.
[19] 缪建锟, 徐晗, 杨皓, 等. 辽宁省水稻主栽品种稻曲病抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(6):38-46.
[20] 冯爱卿, 朱小源, 曾列先, 等. 广东常规稻品种对稻曲病的抗性评价[J]. 中国稻米, 2015, 21(3):34-39
[21] 兰波, 杨迎青, 孙强, 等. 江西晚稻“籼改粳”候选品种对稻曲病的抗性评价[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2016, 38(6):1 029-1 035.
[22] 陈书强. 不同穗型粳稻品种(系)稻曲病粒在穗内粒位上的分布[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(6):1 066-1 071.
Outlines

/

Copyright © Editorial office of China Rice
Tel: 0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail: zgdm@163.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.