
基于鄂北区域的两种水稻缓控释肥用量研究
收稿日期: 2021-08-10
网络出版日期: 2022-01-18
基金资助
湖北省农业科技创新项目-水稻“三优”科技创新;中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2662018YJ026)
Study on the Dosage of Two Kinds of Controlled- Release Fertilizers for Rice in Northern Hubei Province
Received date: 2021-08-10
Online published: 2022-01-18
采用田间试验,研究了两种缓控释肥料施用对鄂北水稻产量和产量构成因子、养分吸收及肥料利用率的影响,比较了两种缓控释肥料不同用量施用效果的差异,以期为鄂北水稻生产中缓控释肥的合理施用提供理论依据。结果表明,施用缓控释肥料可显著提高水稻产量。与不施肥处理相比,施用掺混包膜型控释复合肥料处理水稻增产6.6%~17.3%,施用腐殖酸缓释型复合肥料处理水稻增产0.7%~11.9%;与习惯施肥处理相比,施用掺混包膜型控释复合肥料和腐殖酸缓释型复合肥料处理水稻分别增产8.4%、2.5%;各施肥处理水稻产量提高的主要原因是增加了有效穗数;与腐殖酸缓释型复合肥料相比,掺混包膜型控释复合肥料对水稻增产效果更明显。水稻产量与两种缓控释肥施用量均呈线性加平台关系。相同肥料用量条件下,掺混包膜型控释复合肥料处理水稻地上部N、P2O5和K2O养分积累量明显高于腐殖酸缓释型复合肥料处理。随着施肥量的增加,两种缓控释肥的肥料回收利用率、肥料生理利用率、农学利用率和肥料贡献率均呈现先增加后降低的趋势,肥料偏生产力呈逐渐降低的趋势。综合考虑产量和肥料利用效率,鄂北水稻应优先选用掺混包膜型控释复合肥料,适宜施用量为450 kg/hm2,可获得稻谷产量11 420 kg/hm2。
何帅, 汪本福, 陈斌, 陈超, 赵永平, 李小坤 . 基于鄂北区域的两种水稻缓控释肥用量研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2022 , 28(1) : 103 -108 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2022.01.021
Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of the two types of controlled-release fertilizers with different dosages on rice yield, yield components, nutrient absorption and fertilizer utilization in northern Hubei, aiming to provide scientific basis and guidance for the reasonable application of controlled-release fertilizers. The results showed that application of controlled-release fertilizer could significantly increase rice yield. Compared with the treatment without fertilization, application of the mixed coated slow-release fertilizer (MCSF) and humic acid slow-release fertilizer (HASF) increased rice yield by 6.6%~17.3% and 0.7%~11.9%, respectively. Compared with the conventional fertilization treatment, the yield of the MCSF and the HASF treatment increased by 8.4% and 2.5%, respectively. The increase of rice yield in fertilization treatments was mainly due to the increase of effective panicle number. In addition, the MCSF achieved higher yield increase rate than the HASF. The relationship between rice yield and the two kind of controlled-release fertilizer rate was linear-platform. Under the same fertilizer rate, the N, P2O5 and K2O uptake in above ground of the MCSF was significantly higher than that of the HASF. With the increase of fertilizer amount, the apparent recovery efficiency, physiological efficiency, agronomic efficiency and fertilizer contribution rate of the two controlled-release fertilizers increased at first and then decreased, the partial factor productivity of fertilizer decreased gradually. Considering the yield and fertilizer use efficiency, we recommend that the mixed coated slow-release fertilizer should be preferred in the rice production in northern Hubei. The appropriate application amount was 450 kg/hm2, and the rice yield reached 11 420 kg/hm2.
| [1] | 湖北省统计局. 农村统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1990—2003. |
| [2] | 韩宝吉. 湖北省中稻最佳养分管理技术研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2011. |
| [3] | 郭志奇. 我国水稻栽培现状、高产栽培技术及展望[J]. 南方农业, 2014, 8(21):92-93. |
| [4] | 张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):915-924. |
| [5] | 王伟妮, 鲁剑巍, 陈防, 等. 湖北省水稻施肥效果及肥料利用效率现状研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(2):289-295. |
| [6] | 韩宝吉, 石磊, 徐芳森, 等. 湖北省水稻施肥现状分析及评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2012, 51(12):2 430-2 435. |
| [7] | 汪强, 李双凌, 韩燕来, 等. 缓/控释肥对小麦增产与提高氮肥利用率的效果研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2007(4):693-696. |
| [8] | 纪雄辉, 罗兰芳, 郑圣先. 控释肥料对提高水稻养分利用率和削减稻田土壤环境污染的作用[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2007, 22(2):67-68. |
| [9] | 邓先亮, 屠晓, 李军, 等. 缓控释肥一次性基施对小麦产量及其形成的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(3):87-93. |
| [10] | 刘兆辉, 吴小宾, 谭德水, 等. 一次性施肥在我国主要粮食作物中的应用与环境效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(20):3 827-3 839. |
| [11] | 魏海燕, 李宏亮, 程金秋, 等. 缓释肥类型与运筹对不同穗型水稻产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(5):730-740. |
| [12] | 张夫道, 王玉军. 我国缓/控释肥料的现状和发展方向[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2008(4):1-4. |
| [13] | 徐冰, 邰日晶, 尹同波, 等. 活性腐殖酸复合肥对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2009(3):16-19. |
| [14] | DENG F, WANG L, REN W J, et al. Optimized nitrogen managements and polyaspartic acid urea improved dry matter production and yield of indica hybrid rice[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2015, 145:1-9. |
| [15] | 胡丹丹, 范呈根, 洪欠欠, 等. 等养分条件下缓/控释肥料替代部分速效化肥对中稻生产效益的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2018, 24(1):16-19. |
| [16] | 林磊, 邓亮, 卢碧林. 水稻专用肥施用方式对杂交稻产量和生理的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2016, 43(1):5-10. |
| [17] | 程金秋, 朱盈, 魏海燕, 等. 缓控释肥料在水稻上的应用效果综述[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(17):11-15. |
| [18] | WANG S Q, ZHAO X, XING G X, et al. Improving grain yield and reducing N loss using polymer-coated urea in southeast China[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2015, 35(3):1103-15. |
| [19] | 宇万太, 赵鑫, 张璐, 等. 长期施肥对作物产量的贡献[J]. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(12):2 040-2 044. |
| [20] | 吴萍萍, 刘金剑, 周毅, 等. 长期不同施肥制度对红壤稻田肥料利用率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(2):277-283. |
| [21] | 于飞, 施卫明. 近10年中国大陆主要粮食作物氮肥利用率分析[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(6):1 311-1 324. |
| [22] | 叶全宝, 张洪程, 魏海燕, 等. 不同土壤及氮肥条件下水稻氮利用效率和增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(11):38-44. |
| [23] | 刘润梅, 范茂攀, 付云章, 等. 云南省马铃薯施肥量与化肥偏生产力的关系研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2014, 51(4):753-760. |
| [24] | 张福锁, 张卫锋, 陈新平. 对我国肥料利用率的分析[M]//第二届全国测土配方施肥技术研讨会论文集. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2007. |
| [25] | 牛育华, 李媛, 龙学莉, 等. 腐殖酸肥料在农业生产中的应用及研究进展[J]. 化肥工业, 2016, 43(5):9-12. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |