专论与研究

基于杂交水稻叶片SPAD值的氮素营养诊断模型的初步构建

展开
  • 1贵州大学 农学院,贵阳 550025
    2贵州大学 山地植物资源保护与种质创新教育部重点实验室,贵阳 550025
#共同第一作者:360222403@qq.com

收稿日期: 2023-10-26

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-18

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目子课题(2022YFD1901505-07);国家自然科学基金(32260531);贵州省高层次创新型人才项目(黔科合平台人才[2018]5632);贵州省高层次创新型人才项目(5632-2)

Preliminary Construction of a Diagnostic Model for Nitrogen Nutrition Based on SPAD Values in Leaves of Hybrid Rice

Expand
  • 1College of Agronomy, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
    2Key Laboratory of Plant Resource Conservation and Germplasm Innovation in Mountainous Region (Ministry of Education), Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
#Co-first author:360222403@qq.com

Received date: 2023-10-26

  Online published: 2024-03-18

摘要

为探明水稻叶片SPAD值的最佳测定叶位和最佳的SPAD值次级指标,并构建基于水稻叶片SPAD值的氮素营养诊断模型,开展以品种为主区,氮肥施用量为副区的双因素裂区设计试验。参试品种为Q优6号和宜香优2115,氮肥施用量设5个水平(纯N 0、75、150、225、300 kg/hm2),分析叶片的敏感性、代表性和稳定性,并探讨SPAD值次级指标与施氮量和叶片含氮量之间,及叶片氮积累量与叶片含氮量和产量之间的关系。结果表明,叶片敏感性、代表性和稳定性大小顺序分别为L4(顶4叶)>L3(顶3叶)>L1(顶1叶)>L2(顶2叶)和L3>L4>L2>L1、L2>L3>L4>L1,可见, L3、L4可作为氮素营养诊断的共同理想指示叶。选择L3、L4的SPAD值几何平均数(GMSI34)作为最佳的SPAD值次级指标。由叶片氮积累量与产量和叶片含氮量的抛物线方程、一元线性回归方程, GMSI34与叶片含氮量的指数方程,求得拔节期、孕穗期、抽穗期的SPAD值次级指标的临界值(GMSI34)分别为48.5、44.3和42.9,与实际获取的GMSI34相比较,若GMSI34-GMSI34<0时,则表明水稻缺氮,需要追氮,若GMSI34-GMSI34≥0,则表明水稻氮营养充足,无需追氮。综上,基于杂交水稻叶片SPAD值的氮素营养诊断模型,可为杂交水稻高效氮肥管理提供技术支持。

本文引用格式

任红军, 许桂玲, 冯跃华, 李杰, 王晓珂, 高钰琪, 由晓璇, 韩志丽, 李家乐 . 基于杂交水稻叶片SPAD值的氮素营养诊断模型的初步构建[J]. 中国稻米, 2024 , 30(2) : 5 -12 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2024.02.002

Abstract

A split experiment of two-factor was conducted to explore the best measured leaf position of the SPAD value of rice leaves, the best secondary index of SPAD value, and build a nitrogen (N) nutrition diagnosis model based on the SPAD value of rice leaves. The main plots consisted of variety treatment (two variety: Qyou 6 and Yixiangyou 2115) and the subplots consisted of the N application rate (five N levels: 0, 75, 150, 225, 300 kg/hm2). The sensitivity, representativeness, and stability of rice leaves were analyzed. The relationship between SPAD value index and N application rate and leaf N content (LNC), and the relationship between leaf N accumulation (LNA) and LNC and yield were studied. The results showed that the sensitivity, representativeness and stability of rice leaf in order of magnitude were L4 > L3 > L1 > L2, L3 > L4 > L2 > L1, L2 > L3 > L4 > L1, respectively. Thus, L3 and L4 can be used as the common ideal indicator leaves for N nutrition diagnosis. The geometric mean of SPAD value of the top 3 and 4 leaves of rice plant (GMSI34) was selected as the best secondary index of SPAD value. According to the parabola equation of LNA and yield, univariate linear regression equation of LNA and LNC, and the exponential equation of GMSI34 and LNC, the critical values of SPAD value secondary index (GMSI34cri) at jointing stage, booting stage, and heading stage are 48.5, 44.3, and 42.9, respectively. Compared with the actual GMSI34 (GMSI34act), if GMSI34act < GMSI34cri, it indicates that rice lacks nitrogen and needs nitrogen topdressing, if GMSI34act ≥ GMSI34cri, it shows that the rice has sufficient nitrogen nutrition and does not need nitrogen topdressing. In conclusion, the N nutrition diagnosis model based on the SPAD value of hybrid rice leaves can provide technical support for efficient N fertilizer management of hybrid rice.

参考文献

[1] 曹翠玲, 李生秀, 苗芳. 氮素对植物某些生理生化过程影响的研究进展[J]. 西北农业大学学报, 1999, 27(4):96-101.
[2] 戈长水, 应武, 杨虎, 等. 叶绿素计(SPAD-502)在水稻氮素营养诊断和推荐施肥中的应用、研究及展望[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2014(2): 8-13.
[3] 贾良良, 陈新平, 张福锁. 作物氮营养诊断的无损测试技术[J]. 世界农业, 2001(6):36-37.
[4] 王磊, 卢艳丽, 白由路. 主要粮食作物基于SPAD的氮素营养诊断方法研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(3):546-554.
[5] PENG S B, LAZA M R C, GARCIA F V, et al. Chlorophyll meter estimates leaf area-based nitrogen concentration of rice[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1995, 26(5-6): 927-935.
[6] BALASUBRAMANIAN V, MORALES A C, CRUZ R T, et al. On-farm adaptation of knowledge-intensive nitrogen management technologies for rice systems[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 1998, 53(1): 59-69.
[7] 李刚华, 薛利红, 尤娟, 等. 水稻氮素和叶绿素SPAD叶位分布特点及氮素诊断的叶位选择[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(6):1127-1 134.
[8] 王绍华, 曹卫星, 王强盛, 等. 水稻叶色分布特点与氮素营养诊断[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(12):1461-1 466.
[9] 杨虎. 水稻冠层叶片氮素分布变化及氮营养状况快速诊断[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2014.
[10] 李刚华, 丁艳锋, 薛利红, 等. 利用叶绿素计(SPAD-502)诊断水稻氮素营养和推荐追肥的研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11 (3):412-416.
[11] LIN F F, QIU L F, DENG J S, et al. Investigation of SPAD meter-based indices for estimating rice nitrogen status[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2010, 71:60-65.
[12] 徐梅宣, 陈飞帆, 彭效东. 基于SPAD的水稻氮素含量测量指标及模型研究[J]. 现代农业装备, 2019, 40(6):55-60.
[13] 凌启鸿, 王绍华, 丁艳锋, 等. 关于用水稻“顶3顶4叶叶色差”作为高产群体叶色诊断统一指标的再论证[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(24):4705-4 713.
[14] YUAN Z F, ATA-UL-KARIM S T, CAO Q, et al. Indicators for diagnosing nitrogen status of rice based on chlorophyll meter readings[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, 185:12-20.
[15] 李杰, 冯跃华, 王旭, 等. 水稻叶片SPAD值分布特征及其与施氮量的关系[J]. 南方农业学报, 2017, 48(1):38-45.
[16] 姜继萍, 杨京平, 杨正超, 等. 不同氮素水平下水稻叶片及相邻叶位SPAD值变化特征[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2012, 38(2):166-174.
[17] 何俊俊, 杨京平, 杨虎, 等. 光照及氮素水平对水稻冠层叶片SPAD值动态变化的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2014, 40(5):495-504.
[18] 江立庚, 曹卫星, 姜东, 等. 水稻叶氮量等生理参数的叶位分布特点及其与氮素营养诊断的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(8):745-750.
[19] 张耀鸿, 高文丽, 胡继超. 利用叶绿素计诊断水稻氮素营养的研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2008(6):256-257.
[20] HUSSAIN F, BRONSON K F, YADVINDER S, et al. Use of chlorophyll meter sufficiency indices for nitrogen management of irrigated rice in Asia[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2000, 92(5): 875-879.
[21] 王绍华, 刘胜环, 王强盛, 等. 水稻产量形成与叶片含氮量及叶色的关系[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2002, 25(4):1-5.
[22] 丁艳锋. 氮素营养调控水稻群体质量指标的研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 1997.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-16
公安备案号:33010302003356
版权所有 © 《中国稻米》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370271, 63370368 E-mail:zgdm@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发