
滨海盐碱地泡田期灌排方式对土壤含盐量和水稻产量的影响
收稿日期: 2025-05-18
网络出版日期: 2025-09-11
基金资助
江苏省重点研发计划项目(BE2023355);江苏省农业科技资助创新资金(CX(23)1020);江苏省高等学校基础科学(自然科学)研究重大项目(23KJA210004);扬州大学‘青蓝工程’项目
Effects of Irrigation and Drainage Methods During the Soaking Period on Soil Salinity and Rice Yield in Coastal Saline-Alkali Land
Received date: 2025-05-18
Online published: 2025-09-11
在扬州大学农学院试验农场的盐池(包含轻度、中度和重度盐碱地三类土壤)中,以耐盐水稻品种南粳盐1号作为试验材料,于泡田期设置两种灌排处理(T1和T2),探究滨海盐碱地泡田期不同灌排方式对土壤含盐量以及水稻产量的影响。T1:将盐池内土壤翻地1次,24 h后灌溉3~4 cm水层,24 h后落干,12 h后再次灌溉3~4 cm水层,24 h后排水;循环2次。T2:将盐池内土壤翻地2次,48 h后灌溉3~4 cm水层,48 h后耙地5 cm,落干,12 h后再次灌溉3~4 cm水层,24 h后排水;循环3次。结果表明,轻度、中度和重度盐碱地土壤的脱盐率在T1处理下分别为20.3%、25.7%和34.5%,在T2处理下分别为24.5%、32.4%和42.4%。可见,两种灌排处理均具有较好的脱盐效果,且以T2处理的效果更佳。随着盐胁迫程度加重,水稻拔节期、抽穗期和成熟期的群体茎蘖数及茎蘖成穗率、叶面积指数和干物质量、有效穗数、每穗粒数、结实率、千粒重及水稻产量均呈下降趋势,收获指数则呈增加趋势;与T1处理相比,T2处理提高了轻度、中度和重度盐碱地的水稻关键生育期的群体茎蘖数、茎蘖成穗率、叶面积指数和干物质量及水稻产量(产量增幅分别为1.2%、6.0%和9.1%)。与轻度盐碱地相比,中度和重度盐碱地的水稻产量降幅分别为17.4%和31.1%;本研究表明,合理的泡田期灌排方式有助于快速降低滨海盐碱地土壤的含盐量,进而提高水稻产量。
颜思彤, 朱济邹, 张翔, 汪璐璐, 左博源, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 戴其根, 韦还和 . 滨海盐碱地泡田期灌排方式对土壤含盐量和水稻产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2025 , 31(5) : 76 -80 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2025.05.012
The experiment was carried out in the salt ponds (containing three types of soil: mild, moderate, and severe saline-alkali soil) at the experimental farm of the College of Agriculture, Yangzhou University. Using the salt-tolerant rice variety Nangengyan 1 as the experimental material, two irrigation and drainage treatments (T1 and T2) were set up to explore the impacts of different irrigation and drainage methods during the ponding period in coastal saline-alkali land on soil salinity and rice yield. T1: The soil in the salt ponds was plowed once; after 24 hours, a 3-4 cm water layer was irrigated; after another 24 hours, the field was allowed to dry; after 12 hours, a 3-4 cm water layer was irrigated again, and after 24 hours, the water was drained; this cycle was repeated twice. T2: The soil in the salt ponds was plowed twice; after 48 hours, a 3-4 cm water layer was irrigated; after another 48 hours, the field was harrowed to a depth of 5 cm and then allowed to dry; after 12 hours, a 3-4 cm water layer was irrigated again, and after 24 hours, the water was drained; this cycle was repeated three times. The results showed that the desalination rates of mild, moderate, and severe saline-alkali soils under T1 treatment were 20.3%, 25.7%, and 34.5% respectively; under T2 treatment, they were 24.5%, 32.4%, and 42.4% respectively. It can be seen that both irrigation and drainage treatments had good desalination effects, with T2 treatment showing a better effect. As the degree of salt stress increased, the population tiller number, tillering panicle rate, leaf area index, dry matter weight, effective panicle number, grains per panicle, seed setting rate, 1000-grain weight and yield of rice at the jointing, heading, and maturity stages showed a decreasing trend, while the harvest index showed an increasing trend. Compared with T1 treatment, T2 treatment increased the population tiller number, tillering panicle rate, leaf area index, dry matter weight and rice yields (with increases of 1.2%, 6.0%, and 9.1% respectively) at key growth stages under mild, moderate, and severe saline-alkali conditions. Compared with mild saline-alkali land, the reductions in rice yield under moderate and severe saline-alkali conditions were 17.4% and 31.1% respectively, mainly due to its positive effects on each component of rice yield. This study indicates that reasonable irrigation and drainage methods during the ponding period help to rapidly reduce soil salinity in coastal saline-alkali land and thereby increase rice yield.
| [1] | YANG J T, WANG J F, XU C D, et al. Rice supply flows and their determinants in China[J]. Resource Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 174:105 812. |
| [2] | 王才林, 张亚东, 赵凌, 等. 耐盐碱水稻研究现状、问题与建议[J]. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(1):1-6. |
| [3] | MENG T Y, ZHANG X B, GE J L, et al. Agronomic and physiological traits facilitating better yield performance of japonica/indica hybrids in saline fields[J]. Field Crops Research, 2021, 271:108 255. |
| [4] | 洪立洲, 邢锦城, 乔干群, 等. 滨海盐碱地绿肥粉垄耕作耦合对土壤有机碳积累及组分的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2025, 41(1):61-67. |
| [5] | 韩笑晨, 张贵芹, 王亚辉, 等. 土壤调理剂对滨海盐碱地土壤盐分含量及夏玉米产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7):1 776-1 786. |
| [6] | XU Z K, SHAO T Y, LV Z X, et al. The mechanisms of improving coastal saline soils by planting rice[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 703:135 529. |
| [7] | 左强, 吴训, 石建初, 等. 黄河三角洲滨海盐碱地可持续利用的水土资源约束与均衡配置策略[J]. 中国工程科学, 2023, 25(4):169-179. |
| [8] | 韩冬, 姚宇阗, 陈超, 等. 向日葵种植和灌排淋洗改良滨海盐碱地的协同效应研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2023(7):90-95. |
| [9] | 高宏远. 不同灌排模式下盐渍化农田土壤水盐养分分布规律及模拟分析[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2023. |
| [10] | 贾壮壮, 谭亚男, 管孝艳, 等. 宁夏盐碱地成因及分区治理措施综述[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(5):122-134. |
| [11] | 范文程, 魏中伟, 金文雨, 等. 杂交水稻在不同盐浓度下的产量形成和生理响应[J]. 杂交水稻, 2024, 39(5):87-96. |
| [12] | 周玉杰, 贺治洲, 龙开意, 等. 盐胁迫对热带水稻生长、生理生化特性及产量构成的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2023, 44(12):2 520-2 527. |
| [13] | 任海, 吕小红, 马畅, 等. 盐胁迫对滨海稻区粳稻生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 北方水稻, 2023, 53(4):29-34. |
| [14] | 程生海, 郭夏宇, 陶维旭, 等. 不同耐盐能力水稻品种响应盐胁迫的差异[J]. 杂交水稻, 2024, 39(2):97-104. |
| [15] | 邹燕, 刘芳禧, 方畅宇, 等. 全生育期盐胁迫对不同耐盐性水稻品种(系)生长发育的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 51(1):8-17. |
| [16] | 韦还和, 张翔, 朱旺, 等. 盐胁迫对水稻籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3):734-746. |
| [17] | ZHENG C, LIU C T, LIU L, et al. Effect of salinity stress on rice yield and grain quality: A meta-analysis[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2023, 144:126 765. |
| [18] | JOSHI R, SAHOO K K, TRIPATHI A K, et al. Knockdown of an inflorescence meristem-specific cytokinin oxidase-OsCKX2 in rice reduces yield penalty under salinity stress condition[J]. Plant Cell & Environment, 2018, 41:936-946. |
| [19] | WANG Z Q, ZHANG W Y, BEEBOUT S S, et al. Grain yield, water and nitrogen use efficiencies of rice as influenced by irrigation regimes and their interaction with nitrogen rates[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, 193:54-69. |
| [20] | 鄂继芳, 杨树青, 张万锋, 等. 耕作模式对苏打盐碱土结构稳定性与玉米产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2025, 41(6):98-106. |
| [21] | 王东伟, 路通, 赵壮, 等. 滨海盐碱地耕作层土壤离散元仿真参数标定方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2024, 55(11):240-249. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |