保护性耕作耦合种植密度对水稻产量及稻田碳氮平衡的协同调控
收稿日期: 2025-12-30
网络出版日期: 2026-07-14
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(32301936);高品质水稻资源的引进发掘与创新利用(TZ02.216);水田粮油作物周年高质高效技术模式展示(FWLX20250600261)
Synergistic Regulation of Conservation Tillage Coupling Planting Density on Rice Yield and Carbon and Nitrogen Balance in Paddy Field
1st author:# Co-first author: hujinfu0001@163.com; 2023710807@yangtzeu.edu.cn
Received date: 2025-12-30
Online published: 2026-07-14
2019—2022年在江汉平原开展了为期4年的田间裂区试验,探究耕作方式(免耕NT、减耕RT和常规耕作CT)与种植密度(低密、中密和高密)交互作用对水稻产量及土壤碳氮动态变化的影响。结果显示,耕作方式对水稻产量具有显著影响,NT和RT处理的水稻产量分别比CT提高22.56%和13.95%,且这种增产效应在不同年份间表现出较好的稳定性,变异不显著。此外,耕作方式与种植密度的交互作用对土壤铵硝比的影响因年份而异,其中保护性耕作(NT和RT)对种植密度变化的缓冲能力明显强于CT。经过连续4年的耕种,各处理下的土壤可溶性有机碳含量普遍呈现下降趋势,降幅表现为CT>RT>NT,但各处理间的差异未达到显著水平。土壤有机氮含量的变化则主要受耕作方式的影响。通过主成分分析(PCA)与Mantel检验分析发现,水稻产量与其收获后的土壤铵态氮、硝态氮含量以及铵硝比呈正相关关系,而与土壤氮素减少量呈负相关关系。综上所述,免耕或减耕配合中等种植密度,是实现江汉平原水稻高产、稳产,并维持土壤碳氮平衡的有效管理策略。
胡津辅, 黄富春, 鲁旭鹏, 杨文胜, 朱建强, 李经勇 . 保护性耕作耦合种植密度对水稻产量及稻田碳氮平衡的协同调控[J]. 中国稻米, 2026 , 32(4) : 79 -85 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2026.04.013
A four-year field split-plot experiment was conducted on the Jianghan Plain from 2019 to 2022 to investigate the effects of the interaction between tillage methods(no-tillage, reduced tillage, and conventional tillage) and planting densities (low, medium, and high) on rice yield and the dynamic changes of soil carbon and nitrogen. The results indicated that tillage methods had a significant effect on rice yield, as rice yields under no-tillage (NT) and reduced tillage (RT) increased by 22.56% and 13.95% respectively, compared to conventional tillage (CT). Moreover, this yield-increasing effect demonstrated good stability across different years, with insignificant variation. Additionally, the effect of the interaction between tillage methods and planting densities on the soil ammonium-to-nitrate ratio varied by year, with conservation tillage (NT and RT) exhibiting significantly stronger buffering capacity against changes in planting density compared to CT. After four years of consecutive cultivation, the soil soluble organic carbon content under all treatments generally showed a decreasing trend, with the magnitude of the decrease being CT>RT>NT, although the differences among treatments did not reach a significant level. The changes in soil organic nitrogen content were primarily influenced by tillage methods. Through principal component analysis (PCA) and Mantel test analysis, it was found that rice yield was positively correlated with soil ammonium nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen content, and the ammonium-to-nitrate ratio after harvest, while negatively correlated with the reduction in soil nitrogen. In conclusion, the combination of no-tillage or reduced tillage with medium planting density represents an effective management strategy for achieving high and stable rice yields and maintaining soil carbon and nitrogen balance on the Jianghan Plain.
| [1] | 秦晓波, 王金明, 王斌, 等. 稻田甲烷排放现状、减排技术和低碳生产战略路径[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2023, 19(5):541-558. |
| [2] | 冯淑怡, 李芳. 耕地质量如何影响粮食供给保障能力[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 25(4):70-80. |
| [3] | 于法稳, 代明慧. 土壤健康:提升生态农产品供给能力的根本[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2024, 46(3):203-211. |
| [4] | 潘剑玲, 代万安, 尚占环, 等. 秸秆还田对土壤有机质和氮素有效性影响及机制研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(5):526-535. |
| [5] | 冯冰聪, 马杰, 刘勇, 等. 氮素在农田土壤中迁移转化的研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2025, 42(2):277-287. |
| [6] | 王敬国, 林杉, 李保国. 氮循环与中国农业氮管理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(3):503-517. |
| [7] | 马建华, 樊明寿, 田东海. 双氰胺对马铃薯农田土壤铵态氮、硝态氮转化的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(2):149-151. |
| [8] | 裴志福, 红梅, 尚星玲, 等. 氮添加对土壤可溶性有机碳和微生物生物量碳的影响:基于Meta分析[J]. 土壤, 2024, 56(5):1129-1 136. |
| [9] | 李玲, 仇少君, 刘京涛, 等. 土壤溶解性有机碳在陆地生态系统碳循环中的作用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(5):1407-1 414. |
| [10] | 郭伟, 刘彩红. 长期不同耕作方式对冬小麦地土壤养分变化的影响[J]. 农业技术与装备, 2024, 46(10):189-191. |
| [11] | 沈晓琳, 王丽丽, 汪洋, 等. 保护性耕作对土壤团聚体、微生物及线虫群落的影响研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(3):361-370. |
| [12] | 严洁, 邓良基, 黄剑. 保护性耕作对土壤理化性质和作物产量的影响[J]. 中国农机化, 2005, 22(2):31-34. |
| [13] | 徐新宇, 张玉梅, 向华, 等. 秸秆盖田与减耕下土壤培肥及增产效应的研究[J]. 土壤通报, 1988, 32(2):86-88. |
| [14] | 孔令英, 赵俊晔, 于振文, 等. 宽幅播种条件下种植密度对小麦群体结构和光能利用率的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(7):850-856. |
| [15] | 刘思家, 王小林, 李博洋, 等. 种植密度对绿豆根系形态、光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2024, 52(5):24-32. |
| [16] | 邓远远, 朱俊峰. 保护性耕作技术采纳的增产与稳产效应[J]. 资源科学, 2023, 45(10):2050-2 063. |
| [17] | ZHANG Y, LI X, GREGORICH E G, et al. No-tillage with continuous maize cropping enhances soil aggregation and organic carbon storage in Northeast China[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 330: 204-11. |
| [18] | 庞晔, 袁建钰, 闫丽娟, 等. 保护性耕作对黄土高原旱作麦田土壤氮矿化的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(9):1446-1 456. |
| [19] | 祁剑英, 王兴, 濮超, 等. 保护性耕作对土壤氮组分影响研究进展[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(suppl1):222-229. |
| [20] | 刘婷婷, 徐云浩, 刘贵梅, 等. 土壤pH和铵硝比对杉木与木荷幼苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2025, 31(6):1175-1 188. |
| [21] | 常晓, 张云龙, 徐翎清, 等. 不同氮素形态配比对甜菜氮同化关键酶的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2025, 41(1):235-242. |
| [22] | 祖庆学, 聂忠扬, 林松, 等. 铵态氮和硝态氮配比对烤烟生长及离子平衡的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, 39(3):154-158. |
| [23] | 张亚捷, 牛海山. 农田土壤氧化亚氮产生机制和相关模型研究进展[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(5):554-562. |
| [24] | 薛建福, 赵鑫, DIKGWATLHE S B, 等. 保护性耕作对农田碳、氮效应的影响研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(19):6006-6 013. |
| [25] | 李彪, 白云松, 周文河, 等. 保护性耕作对农田碳、氮效应的影响分析[J]. 江西农业, 2017, 10(3):41. |
| [26] | ZHANG M, SONG X, WU X, et al. Microbial regulation of aggregate stability and carbon sequestration under long-term conservation tillage and nitrogen application[J]. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2024, 44: 74-86. |
| [27] | 石梦迪, 于乔乔, 蒋文月. 带旋和全旋耕作对稻茬小麦生长和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(8):65-75. |
| [28] | 王岩松, 李梦迪, 朱连奇. 保护性耕作对农田土壤有机碳及农业生产力的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2016, 6(4):40-47. |
| [29] | 吕瑞珍, 熊瑛, 李友军, 等. 保护性耕作对农田土壤碳库特性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(4):206-209. |
| [30] | 隋鹏祥, 罗洋, 王浩, 等. 耕作方式对农田黑土有机碳库和酶化学计量特征的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(7):4441-4 449. |
| [31] | 秦越, 李彬彬, 武兰芳. 不同耕作措施下秸秆还田土壤CO2排放与溶解性有机碳的动态变化及其关系[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(7):1442-1 449. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |