长江中下游流域水稻试验品种的耐热性鉴定

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2022.06.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

高温热害已成为影响我国特别是长江流域水稻生长发育及高产稳产的主要限制因素之一。本研究利用大田自然高温、温室高温两种环境对2018—2020年的1 379份水稻材料的开花期耐热性进行了鉴定和评价，系统分析了不同年份间、不同品种类型间、不同来源渠道品种间耐热性情况。结果表明，供试材料中耐热性达到1、3、5、7、9级的品种比例分别为11.96%、66.78%、18.06%、2.76%和0.44%，且耐热品种呈逐年增多的趋势；两系杂交稻、三系杂交稻、常规稻中开花期耐热性达到强至较强（1级和3级）的品种占比分别为82.57%、73.45%和60.00%，不同类型品种的耐热性表现为两系杂交稻>三系杂交稻>常规稻；国家（省）区试、绿色通道、联合体渠道来源的品种的开花期耐热性整体表现相似。本试验综合利用大田自然高温、温室高温两种环境建立了一套水稻开花期耐热性鉴定规程和评价方法，可以对供试材料在不同年份、不同环境、不同程度热胁迫下的耐热性做出相对一致、客观的评价。

关键词: 水稻, 开花期, 耐热性, 结实率, 相对耐热系数

Abstract:

High temperature has become one of the main limiting factors affecting the growth and development of rice. In this study, totally 1379 rice varieties in recent three years were identified for heat tolerance at the flowering stage under natural field and greenhouse conditions, and the thermotolerance phenotype among varieties from different years, different types and sources was comprehensively analyzed. Among tested materials, 11.96%, 66.78%, 18.06%, 2.76% and 0.44% of them had the best （Grade 1）, good （Grade 3）, medium （Grade 5）, poor （Grade 7） and the worst （Grade 9） heat tolerance at the flowering stage, respectively; and the number of heat-tolerant varieties is increasing year by year. The overall situation of heat tolerance of different type cultivars was as follows: two-line hybrids > three line hybrids > conventional rice, in two-line hybrid rice, three-line hybrid rice and conventional rice, the proportion of varieties with heat tolerance above grade 3 at the flowering stage were 82.57%, 73.45% and 60.00%, respectively. The rice materials from national or provincial regional trial, green channel regional trial and alliance regional trial had similar heat-resistant performance. A set of identification method and assessment system have been established for rice heat tolerance at the flowering stage by adopting both natural high-temperature and artificial greenhouse conditions, which can make a relatively consistent and objective evaluation for heat tolerance of tested materials from different years, different environments and different degrees of heat stress.

Key words: rice, flowering stage, heat tolerance, seed setting ratio, relative heat-resistant coefficient

中图分类号:

S511.037

肖本泽, 南波, 张方玉. 长江中下游流域水稻试验品种的耐热性鉴定[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(6): 21-26.

XIAO Benze, NAN Bo, ZHANG Fangyu. Identification of Heat Tolerance of Rice Test Varieties in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. China Rice, 2022, 28(6): 21-26.

图/表 6

表1 水稻材料开花期耐高温性的分级评价标准

图1 试验点2018—2020年7—8月份大田温度数据

图2 试验点2018—2020年7—8月份玻璃温室温度数据

表2 不同年度间供试水稻材料的耐热性级别概况

表3 不同类型水稻品种耐热性级别概况较

表4 不同试验渠道的水稻材料间耐热性级别概况

参考文献 27

[1]	胡声博, 张玉屏, 朱德峰, 等. 杂交水稻耐热性评价[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(6):751-756.
[2]	LI X M, CHAO D Y, WU Y, et al. Natural alleles of a proteasome α2 subunit gene contribute to thermotolerance and adaptation of African rice[J]. Nature Genetics, 2015, 47(7): 827-833.
[3]	ROYBAL C M, BUTTERFIELD B J. Functional trait heritability and local climatic adaptation among grasses: A meta-analysis[J]. Plant Ecology, 2018, 219(4): 369-379.
[4]	郭建茂, 吴越, 杨沈斌, 等. 典型高温年不同播期一季稻产量差异及其原因分析[J]. 中国农业气象, 2017, 38(2):121-130.
[5]	XIAO Y H, PAN Y, LUO L H, et al. Quantitative trait loci associated with seed set under high temperature stress at the flowering stage in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Euphytica, 2011, 178: 331-338.
[6]	JAGADISH K S V, CRAUFURD P, SHI W, et al. A phenotypic marker for quantifying heat stress impact during microsporogenesis in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2013, 41(1): 48-55.
[7]	ZHAO L, LEI J, HUANG Y, et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci for heat tolerance at anthesis in rice using chromosomal segment substitution lines[J]. Breed Science, 2016, 66(3): 358-366.
[8]	KOBAYASHI A, SONODA J, SUGIMOTO K, et al. Detection and verification of QTLs associated with heat-induced quality decline of rice(Oryza sativa L.) using recombinant inbred lines and near-isogenic lines[J]. Breed Science, 2013, 63(3): 339-346.
[9]	LYMAN N B, JAGADISH K S, NALLEY L L, et al. Neglecting rice milling yield and quality underestimates economic losses from high-temperature stress[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(8): e72157.
[10]	MATSUI T, OMASA K. Rice(Oryza sativa L.) cultivars tolerant to high temperature at flowering: Anther characteristics[J]. Annals of Botany, 2002, 89(6): 683-687.
[11]	PENG S, HUANG J, SHEEHY J E, et al. Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004, 101(27): 9971-9975. PMID
[12]	谢晓金, 李秉柏, 李映雪, 等. 抽穗期高温胁迫对水稻产量构成要素和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2010, 31(3): 411-415.
[13]	张桂莲, 张顺堂, 肖浪涛, 等. 花期高温胁迫对水稻花药生理特性及花粉性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(1):177-183.
[14]	JARDINE K, CHAMBERS J, ALVES E G, et al. Dynamic balancing of isoprene carbon sources reflects photosynthetic and photorespiratory responses to temperature stress[J]. Plant Physiology, 2014, 166(4): 2051-2064. PMID
[15]	曹立勇, 赵建根, 占小登, 等. 水稻耐热性的QTL定位及耐热性与光合速率的相关性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(3):223-227.
[16]	曹云英, 段骅, 杨立年, 等. 抽穗和灌浆早期高温对耐热性不同籼稻品种产量的影响及其生理原因[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(3):512-521.
[17]	雷东阳. 开花期高温胁迫对水稻花粉粒性状及结实率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(18):35-39.
[18]	陈庆全, 余四斌, 李春海, 等. 水稻抽穗开花期耐热性QTL的定位分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(2):315-321.
[19]	朱昌兰, 江玲, 张文伟, 等. 稻米直链淀粉含量和胶稠度对高温耐性的QTL分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2006, 20(3):248-252.
[20]	肖本泽, 赵爽, 龚耀, 等. 水稻分蘖田间耐热性鉴定方法[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2011, 30(5):539-544.
[21]	刘业涛, 穆麒麟, 王毅, 等. 从非洲水稻材料中筛选耐高温种质资源[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(12):8-12.
[22]	郭晓艺, 熊洪, 张林, 等. 杂交水稻恢复系和杂交组合的耐热性评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(9):1343-1354.
[23]	朱兴明, 曾庆曦, 宁清利. 自然高温对杂交稻开花受精的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 1983, 16(2):37-44.
[24]	吕直文, 严明建, 黄成志, 等. 水稻亲本材料及其杂交组合开花灌浆期耐热性评价[J]. 种子, 2016, 35(7):69-72.
[25]	万丙良, 周亚贞, 査中萍, 等. 水稻恢复系R1056的耐热性鉴定及育种应用评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(4):753-757.
[26]	符冠富, 宋健, 廖西元, 等. 中国常用水稻保持系及恢复系开花灌浆期耐热性评价[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(5):495-500.
[27]	査中萍, 殷得所, 万丙良, 等. 水稻种质资源开花期耐热性分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2016(1):17-19.